Photo, posted without a caption
❤1

Channel
@wuxizhualongjin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,941subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002170305945 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wuxizhualongjin |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wuxizhualongjin |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 1,941 | +9 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 1,932 | +1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 1,931 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 1,930 | -9 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 1,939 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:17 | 1,944 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 1,945 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 1,946 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 1,948 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 1,946 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 1,949 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 1,948 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 1,951 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 1,950 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
7 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥优惠活动进行中👇 详情请咨询客服哦
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
【验证留名】 :匿名 【验证时间】:5.24 【妹子花名】:泰巴适抓龙筋 【联系方式】tg:@yy36899 【联系问题】: 【所在位置】:无锡 【修车水费】:700 【身高身材】:168 【颜值相似】:8 【凶器罩杯】:c 【服务内容】:套餐b 【服务详情】:一开始是柔式,翻面进入正题。老师手嫩,手掌摩擦龟头的方法真的很好,总是能有一激灵的感觉,在途中不小心射了一次,但是依旧软不下来,后面进行前高的时候也是成功喷出,喷出后状态就比较疲软了,但是老师还是问我能不能再出一次,我回答能之后老师就不停的摩擦龟头,在中途我本来还想放弃再射,但是架不住实在是太爽了,就一直让老师摩擦,10分钟之后也是成功喷出。老师不仅有手法,而且也很耐心,不像有些技师看到射了就一副那种表情。 【机车行为】:无 【优点缺点】:服务态度非常好,手法也是一流 【推荐程度】:满分
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @wuxizhualongjin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“无锡抓龙筋” (@wuxizhualongjin), 1,941 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wuxizhualongjin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.