Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Write_and_rule

@writeandrule

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

777subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002194028043
TypeChannel
Username@writeandrule
DescriptionВадим Сотников, сценарист и продюсер: https://www.kinopoisk.ru/name/2802219/ По всем вопросам можно писать на: i@vakemba.ru Эксклюзивные материалы здесь: https://boosty.to/vadimsotnikov Авторская комната: https://vadim-sotnikov.tilda.ws/intensiv
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/writeandrule

Growth

7777 Aug 2026, 17:30 — 777 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:48 — 777 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:308 Aug 2026, 01:48
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 776–778 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 01:48777no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:30777first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 30 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.6%
avg views ÷ 777 subscribers
Avg views / post
339
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held17 (30 May 20265 August 2026)
Views total2,711
Reactions total97
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
93
Videos
3
Links
161

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

265 reactions across 16 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10640.0%
8230.9%
🍾207.55%
😁166.04%
🤣124.53%
👍114.15%
🙏31.13%
20.755%
👌20.755%
👏20.755%
💔20.755%
💯20.755%
10.377%
👎10.377%
🕊10.377%
🤝10.377%
🥰10.377%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 265reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC112 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В SCRIPTCLUB — ‼️РАЗГОНЫ‼️ Для участников сообщества. Ровно год назад мы запустили формат совместной практики, попробовали, сделали выводы — и теперь возвращаемся сильнее. Друзья, если вы давно мучаете заявку, которая всё никак не складывается; синопсис, который всё никак не дописывается; анекдот, который ваш муж или жена не дослушивает, — присылайте их мне. Я верю: если что-то делать правильно, у тебя обязательн

🔥3🍾2👏21

1 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC246 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Офигеть! Уже год прошел! https://t.me/writeandrule/91

🔥32💔2

30 Jul 2026, 07:58 UTC303 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А что если... главная героиня засыпает без таблеток, не бухает, без ПТСР и не мент? И вообще он! 😳 Зуб даю, от такого смелого питча на платформах у всех варежки отвалятся!

😁16🤣10👌211

26 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC413 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Боже мой! Они всё-таки сделали это! да ещё и сериал!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1Jr0oL9SXw

🔥3

24 Jul 2026, 20:54 UTC354 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я к вам с внезапным… жемчужиной. Открыл для себя «Аврору». Там под мышками у античных скульптур, прошла премьера фильма «Непокой». Это российский полнометражный анимационный фильм с рейтингом 18+. Что уже само по себе событие. Спойлерить не буду. Да, если честно, и не смогу — сюжет там такой, что без критиков разберутся только поклонники «Фури-кури». Расскажу только завязку: двое друзей — главный, как я понял, г

🔥83👎1

20 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTC560 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Друзья, помните, я рассказывал вам про Аню Смольнякову? Случилось невероятное: Аня запустила свой интенсив по комедии! Про «невероятное» я без иронии, потому что Аня из тех профи, которые редко выходят в публичное поле, и обычно приходится учиться у них прямо во время работы на живом проекте. Но наконец-то можно и просто учиться! Аня — один из самых сильных редакторов, с кем мне доводилось работать, и обладает суп

👍4🔥41🤝1🙏1

17 Jul 2026, 07:12 UTC356 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У каждого сценариста должен быть свой зубной, парикмахер и продакшен! Почему - написал очень подробно вот в этом посте.

5

16 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC367 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Из рубрики «Как там на работе?» Купил подписку на "Диадок", перечитал штрафы и согласовал их с внутренним паникёром. Заплатил юристу. Проверил, чтобы соавторы подписали договор. Проверил сроки. Сверился с регламентом создания сценарных материалов от Платформы. Ещё попаниковал. Заполнил заявку на кредит — пересидеть кассовый разрыв. Так... вроде ничего не забыл. Ааа, чёрт, у нас же созвон по посерийнику! Примерно та

🔥147

9 Jul 2026, 18:31 UTC382 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ваш проект — это вы! Это главная мысль прошедшего сегодня мастер-класса. Мы говорили о том, как продюсеры и редакторы читают заявки, питчи и первые письма. Что они видят в проекте. Где начинают доверять автору. Где теряют интерес. И почему иногда дело не в жанре, не в тренде и даже не в том, что «такое сейчас никто не купит». О том, что вместе с проектом всегда продаётся ещё и автор. Его способность выбирать тему

🔥86💯2🙏2👍1

9 Jul 2026, 15:39 UTC347 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

"Мы ищем оригинальные идеи! Но такое сейчас никто не купит, сейчас только сказки". Обсудим этот парадокс сегодня в 19:30. Приходите! Ссылка уже в закрытом канале.

🔥8

9 Jul 2026, 10:55 UTC428 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Почему мои проекты не покупают? Поговорим об этом сегодня в 19:30. Попробуем посмотреть на проект не только глазами автора, но и глазами продюсера: что он видит в заявке, чего боится, где теряет интерес и почему иногда хорошая идея всё равно не превращается в сделку. По традиции в закрытом канале за час до события появится ссылка. Приходите!

7🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @writeandrule. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,129,831 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Write_and_rule” (@writeandrule), 777 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/writeandrule.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.