Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 37 days, net +96. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 395–528 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Sept 2026, 01:20
506
-7
6 Sept 2026, 15:57
513
+2
28 Aug 2026, 14:08
511
-2
22 Aug 2026, 13:34
513
+87
15 Aug 2026, 00:58
426
+13
8 Aug 2026, 09:11
413
+3
8 Aug 2026, 05:35
410
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:02
410
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4h 18m
Average length
28m 44s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
148 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
65
43.9%
custom 5377390086423852794
13
8.78%
💘
9
6.08%
🔥
8
5.41%
custom 5204117842844205046
7
4.73%
custom 5970026312629228447
7
4.73%
custom 5348432557920773429
6
4.05%
custom 5791906519851208701
4
2.70%
custom 5971923279424787131
4
2.70%
❤🔥
4
2.70%
custom 5429178965287782978
3
2.03%
custom 5956109643632612120
3
2.03%
👍
3
2.03%
😁
3
2.03%
😍
3
2.03%
custom 4992615953628922857
2
1.35%
custom 5242654728965352376
2
1.35%
🍾
1
0.676%
👌
1
0.676%
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
آکواریوم Forests Underwater فقط بزرگترین آکواریوم گیاهی جهان نیست؛ این اثر، آخرین شاهکار تاکاشی آمانو است. او پس از سالها سفر ، عکاسی از جنگلهای بارانی و ترویج فلسفه Nature Aquarium، تمام تجربه و دیدگاه خودش رو در این پروژه به اوج رسوند. چند ماه پس از افتتاح این آکواریوم، آمانو از دنیا رفت و این اثر به میراث ماندگار او تبدیل شد
به همین دلیل، بسیاری از علاقهمندان آکواآسکیپینگ این پروژه را وصیت هنری تاکاشی آمانو م…
جنگل های غرق شده (Florestas Submersas) شاهکار افسانهای Takashi Amano و بزرگترین آکواریوم گیاهی جهان است که در سال ۲۰۱5 در آکواریوم لیسبون پرتغال افتتاح شد
در این ویدیو، تیم Green Aqua از این آکواریوم بازدید میکند و درباره ایده ساخت، طراحی، انتخاب متریال، سیستم نگهداری و چالشهای اجرای این شاهکار توضیح میدهد.
فکتهای جالب پروژه:
🤩 طول آکواریوم: ۴۰ متر
💧 حجم آب: ۱۶۰ هزار لیتر
🌿 بیش از ۷۶ هزار گیاه از ۴۶ گونه مختلف …
بعد از پستی که درباره الیگیتور گار گذاشتیم، این هم قسمت مربوط به همین ماهی از مستند فوقالعاده River Monsters. 🐳
جرمی وید این بار دنبال یکی از مرموزترین شکارچیان آب شیرین میرود تا بفهمد آیا الیگیتور گار واقعاً برای انسان خطرناک است یا فقط بدنام شده است. 🕵️♂️🐊
#AlligatorGar #Atractosteus_spatula #Gar #MonsterFish #River_monsters
#jeremy_wade
#الیگیتور_گار #گار #آکواریوم #مستند
#جرمی_وید
World Of Fish Channel 🐉
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @worldoffishchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑊𝑜𝑟𝑙𝑑 𝑂𝑓 𝐹𝑖𝑠ℎ 𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑙” (@worldoffishchannel), 506 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/worldoffishchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
