»Sahaiyax3« 💠 @PersianTwix
🤣579👍24❤3👻1💔1

Channel
@PersianTwix
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
1,012,051subscribers
-17,160 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001014015750 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PersianTwix |
| Description | 🔹️تویکس = توییتر + ایکس🔹️ 🔸️ انتشار توییت های پر بازدید توییتر (ایکس)🔸️ 🔰 تعرفه تبلیغات: 👉 @PersianTwixAds 🔰 ادمین جهت ارتباط و تبلیغات: 👉 @PersianTwixAdmin انتقاد، پیشنهاد، دلگرمی: 👇 http://t.me/HidenChat_Bot?start=7740198177 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PersianTwix |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 1,012,051 | +2,039 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 1,010,012 | +540 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 1,009,472 | -182 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 1,009,654 | -1,387 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 1,011,041 | -3,778 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 1,014,819 | -3,957 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 1,018,776 | -3,916 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 1,022,692 | -4,153 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:10 | 1,026,845 | -2,366 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 1,029,211 | first reading |
165 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 165 (5 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,497,380 |
| Reactions total | 331,638 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 34 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 11of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 2.5 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 29.6% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 75.3% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 32,700 views — 3.20% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 34,200).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /96527 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC | 120 minutes – 20 minutes old | 6,300 views ~840 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /96507 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC | 219 minutes – 49 minutes old | 3,060 views ~13 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 28 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /96497 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC | 315 minutes – 80 minutes old | 14,100 views ~1,400 reactions | 60 minutes: 11,265 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 29 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /96487 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC | 415 minutes – 1.8 hours old | 16,000 views ~1,310 reactions | 60 minutes: 10,946 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 37 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /96477 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC | 515 minutes – 2.3 hours old | 19,000 views ~1,224 reactions | 60 minutes: 10,683 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 52 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /96467 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC | 610 minutes – 2.8 hours old | 19,700 views ~1,510 reactions | 60 minutes: 9,454 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 63 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /96457 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC | 710 minutes – 3.3 hours old | 21,000 views ~1,676 reactions | 60 minutes: 9,752 interp. → 3.0 hours: 19,928 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 67 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /96447 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC | 85 minutes – 3.8 hours old | 22,700 views ~2,379 reactions | 60 minutes: 10,187 interp. → 3.0 hours: 20,086 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 70 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
321,077 reactions across 161 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 219,973 | 68.5% | |
| 👍 | 34,548 | 10.8% | |
| ❤ | 33,386 | 10.4% | |
| 😭 | 9,383 | 2.92% | |
| 💔 | 6,531 | 2.03% | |
| 😐 | 6,153 | 1.92% | |
| 👎 | 4,361 | 1.36% | |
| 🥰 | 1,474 | 0.459% | |
| 😁 | 1,150 | 0.358% | |
| 🔥 | 928 | 0.289% | |
| 😢 | 609 | 0.19% | |
| 🤔 | 520 | 0.162% | |
| 😱 | 410 | 0.128% | |
| 👏 | 347 | 0.108% | |
| ❤🔥 | 288 | 0.09% | |
| 👀 | 223 | 0.069% | |
| 🥴 | 167 | 0.052% | |
| 🤝 | 126 | 0.039% | |
| 🤪 | 92 | 0.029% | |
| 🤩 | 90 | 0.028% | |
| 14 further kinds | 318 | 0.099% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 165 of the 165 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 331,638reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 165 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
»Sahaiyax3« 💠 @PersianTwix
🤣579👍24❤3👻1💔1
یک زوج چینی موقع دیدن آلبومهای قدیمی فهمیدن ۱۱ سال قبل از آشنایی، تو یک عکس ناخواسته کنار هم بودن! سال ۲۰۰۰ از دو شهر مختلف رفتن گردشگری و درست در یک ثانیه عکس گرفتن. از نظر ریاضی احتمال این اتفاق بین ۱٫۳ میلیارد نفر تقریبا صفره، ولی جهان گاهی تصادفاتش زیادی قشنگه! »Amir Ameri« 💠 @PersianTwix
❤727😭198😁17👍7🔥4
🍕 یه پیتزا بخوری یا یه خونه بسازی؟ 🏠 تا حالا فکر کردی قیمت یه پیتزای معمولی چقدره؟ حدود ۷۰۰–۸۰۰ هزار تومن. یه لذت چند دقیقهای که میاد و میره، تهش هم… چی میشه؟ فقط سنگینیِ معدهست! اما اگه بهت بگم با پولِ همین یه پیتزا یا حتی خیلی کمتر، حتی ۱۰۰ هزار تومن، میتونی توی ساختِ خونهی یه خانواده شریک بشی که از داشتن یه خونهی مناسب محرومه؟ 🧱 ما بچههای «گروه جهادی ادب» امسال برای هفدهمین سال، میزنیم به دلِ جاده و می…
❤170🤣46👏17🤯4❤🔥3
به همسرم میگم کادوی تولد ۴۰ سالگیت چی برات بگیرم؟ میگه بیمه ماشینم رو پرداخت کن. رابطهها، ۱۶ سال بعد. :))) »خانومی که من باشم« 💠 @PersianTwix
🤣1,300❤93😁22🔥8👏7
دیروز برق رفته بود منم حوصلهام سر رفته بود با بچههای همسایهمون( ۶.۷سالشونه) بازی کردم و کاملا جدی امروز اومدن زنگ خونمون و زدن گفتن خاله میایی بازی ؟ :))))))))))))))))))))) »"نانوم ننرمند"« 💠 @PersianTwix
🤣2,040😭226❤66❤🔥10🌚5
امروز از شدت بیپولی تصمیم گرفتم ماشینمو بیرون جنگل پارک کنم که پول ورودی ندم یهو نگهبان گفت خانوم یکی برای شما اشتراک یه ماه گرفته میتونید رایگان بیارید تو ماشینتون رو، هر چی گفتم کی بوده گفته اجازه ندارم بگم؛ واقعا خوشحال شدم با این کارش، کاش میشد ازش تشکر کنم. ».مُحَنایَم.« 💠 @PersianTwix
❤1,320🤣199🤔69😭37🥰27
توی میوهفروشی یه خانمی حدود ده دقیقه داشت هندونهها رو یکییکی بلند میکرد، میزد بهشون، گوش میداد و میذاشت سر جاشون. آخرش یکی رو انتخاب کرد و رو به میوهفروش گفت این خوبه؟ آقائه گفت شما اگه گوش میدادی میفهمیدی همهشون میگفتن من خوبم. منو انتخاب کن. بعد بدترین رو برداشتی. »Zahra Amiri« 💠 @PersianTwix
🤣1,700❤35🥱14👍6😁5
پیام زن داییم همین الان😂🚶♂️ »lady chef« 💠 @PersianTwix
🤣1,670❤59😁20😭17👍14
دولت تصمیم گرفته دهک من رو به ۱۰ ارتقا بده، یعنی از نظر ثروت من و صاحب گروه صنعتی گلرنگ و بابک زنجانی توی یه دسته قرار میگیریم، جالبه😄😄😄😄 »Arnavaz« 💠 @PersianTwix
🤣1,980😭97👍27🔥25😁21
بابای من خیلی بامزه س. زنگ زده به وکیلش نمیتونسته جواب بده پیام آماده گوشی که نوشته Please text me رو واسهش فرستاده بابامم یک صحفه پیام بلند بالای انگلیسی فرستاده واسه ش زیرشم نوشته حالا که پلیز تکست می خودتم بشین معنی کن به زبونی که پیام دادی گفتم چیکارت دارم:))) »notmahshad« 💠 @PersianTwix
🤣1,940👀48👏37😨18😁13
مامانم اینا تا گربهم دهن وا میکنه بهش خوراکی میدن و الانم دکترا گفتن اضافه وزن داره. دقیقا قرمونی که بچگیام بزرگ شدم؛ هربار دهنم رو وا کردم بهم خوراکی دادن تا اضافه وزن گرفتم =))) »Zelda« 💠 @PersianTwix
🤣1,650😭79❤38💔15👀12
بابام میگه«این اواخر چیزی اذیتت میکنه؟» میگم«مردهای زشت» میگه «آره، منم.میفهمم.» :)))) بعد چند دقیقه فکر کرده رفته یواشکی به مامانم میگه «به نظرت منم مرد زشت حساب میشم؟» الهییییییییییییییی قربووووونت برممممم تو زیبااااترینییییی »داداشش« 💠 @PersianTwix
😭2,750🤣272❤🔥123😢26🥴23
Showing the 12 most recent of 165 posts we hold for @PersianTwix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 165,196 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پرشین توییکس 😎” (@PersianTwix), 1,012,051 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PersianTwix.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.