В StonksGift добавили розыгрыши 🐸 🥊 Приглашайте рефералов, играйте в разные режимы, выполняйте квесты, зарабатывайте билеты и участвуйте в розыгрышах NFT 🎁 Получить подарок: @StonksGiftBot
🔥2🤝1😱1

Channel
@whytonchik
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
28,853subscribers
-1,671 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001629594942 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @whytonchik |
| Description | по всем questions: @zavhozton |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/whytonchik |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @whytonchik/6360 · this entry13 Apr 2026, 19:24 UTC | @cryptowisdomowl/74016 Apr 2026, 09:19 UTC | 1.00 | 3 days |
| @whytonchik/6363 · this entry14 Apr 2026, 17:25 UTC | @cryptowisdomowl/74316 Apr 2026, 09:19 UTC | 1.00 | 40 hours |
| @whytonchik/6365 · this entry22 Apr 2026, 12:15 UTC | @cryptowisdomowl/74522 Apr 2026, 13:13 UTC | 1.00 | 57 minutes |
| @whytonchik/6368 · this entry17 May 2026, 13:44 UTC | @cryptowisdomowl/75024 May 2026, 19:11 UTC | 1.00 | 7 days |
| @whytonchik/6371 · this entry31 May 2026, 14:06 UTC | @cryptowisdomowl/7521 Jun 2026, 11:31 UTC | 1.00 | 21 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @cryptowisdomowl | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 40 hours | this entry (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 12 April 2026 to 7 October 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @whytonchik — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 10:48 | 28,853 | -19 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 21:56 | 28,872 | -24 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 11:38 | 28,896 | -7 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 15:00 | 28,903 | -7 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:09 | 28,910 | -6 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 19:17 | 28,916 | -15 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:30 | 28,931 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:49 | 28,935 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:44 | 28,942 | -13 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 19:07 | 28,955 | -36 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:31 | 28,991 | -58 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:01 | 29,049 | -52 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:35 | 29,101 | -49 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:00 | 29,150 | -85 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:58 | 29,235 | -97 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:34 | 29,332 | -120 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:05 | 29,452 | -95 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:58 | 29,547 | -112 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:49 | 29,659 | -62 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 18:55 | 29,721 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 165 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 October 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
90 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 32 | 35.6% | |
| 😱 | 24 | 26.7% | |
| 🤯 | 19 | 21.1% | |
| 🤝 | 12 | 13.3% | |
| 😎 | 3 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В StonksGift добавили розыгрыши 🐸 🥊 Приглашайте рефералов, играйте в разные режимы, выполняйте квесты, зарабатывайте билеты и участвуйте в розыгрышах NFT 🎁 Получить подарок: @StonksGiftBot
🔥2🤝1😱1
Иранцы уходят в BTC на фоне войны 😃 По данным Chainalysis, жители Ирана активно покупают Bitcoin и выводят его с местных бирж в самостоятельное хранение Поток снижался только во время масштабного отключения интернета, но после восстановления доступа снова резко вырос BTC работает 24/7, но доступ к нему всё ещё зависит от интернета и возможности подключиться к бирже
🔥4🤯1😱1
В StonksGift вышел режим PvP 🎁 Делаем ставки грамом или подарками - чем больше ставка, тем выше шанс забрать весь банк в раунде 🎁 Промокод на бесплатный кейс: PVPSTONKS
🔥1🤝1😱1
🤤 Неизвестного кита ликвидировало почти на $175 000 000 одним ордером на бирже Binance
😱4🤯2🔥1
StonksGift запустили еженедельный лидерборд 🎧 Место в топе зависит от суммы оборота ставок. Ставки учитываются во всех режимах: @StonksGiftBot Чем выше место в топе, тем дороже подарок вы получите 🍷
🔥1😎1😱1
У Илона Маска денег в 2 раза больше чем капитализация альткоинов 🤔
🔥4😱2😎1
🎁 В StonksGift добавили новый кейс, из которого падают только NFT Сегодня сделал в нём 6 иксов с с первого раза, очень хорошая отдача: @StonksGiftBot 😎 Ещё у них в канале идёт конкурс, где можно выиграть кепку, персик и шлем 🎁
🔥1😎1😱1
⚠️ Хакеры взломали криптомост Gravity Bridge: ущерб индустрии превысил $328 млн Злоумышленники получили доступ к контракту и вывели активы на $5,4 млн (USDC, WETH, USDT, PAXG) ➡️ Часть средств уже выведена через биржи, на кошельке хакера остается ~$4,2 млн в ETH ➡️ Валидаторы остановили работу сети, токен GRAV просел на 4% Это 8-й крупный взлом моста в 2026 году
🔥2😱2🤝1🤯1
Что то готовится на завтрашнее 5-летие TON 👀
🔥2🤝1😱1
С пятницы трейдеров ликвиднуло на $1.5 млрд, из которых 90% — лонги 😱
🔥2🤝1🤯1
🍸 В StonksGift вышел новый режим - турнир Раунд длится 6 часов, нужно удержаться в топе. Топ-3 места делят между собой банк Ещё один игрок рандомно получает бонусный приз 😎 Залетаем в турик и забираем банк: @StonksGiftBot
🔥1🤯1😱1
⚪️ 😮 Компания Bitmine, связанная с Томом Ли, продолжает наращивать позиции в Ethereum - было приобретено ещё 100 000 ETH на сумму около $233,7 млн
🔥3🤯1😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @whytonchik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“why ton” (@whytonchik), 28,853 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whytonchik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.