Channel
@cryptowisdomowl
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
120subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001903588537 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptowisdomowl |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 December 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptowisdomowl |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @whytonchik/636013 Apr 2026, 19:24 UTC | @cryptowisdomowl/740 · this entry16 Apr 2026, 09:19 UTC | 1.00 | 3 days |
| @whytonchik/636314 Apr 2026, 17:25 UTC | @cryptowisdomowl/743 · this entry16 Apr 2026, 09:19 UTC | 1.00 | 40 hours |
| @whytonchik/636522 Apr 2026, 12:15 UTC | @cryptowisdomowl/745 · this entry22 Apr 2026, 13:13 UTC | 1.00 | 57 minutes |
| @whytonchik/636817 May 2026, 13:44 UTC | @cryptowisdomowl/750 · this entry24 May 2026, 19:11 UTC | 1.00 | 7 days |
| @whytonchik/637131 May 2026, 14:06 UTC | @cryptowisdomowl/752 · this entry1 Jun 2026, 11:31 UTC | 1.00 | 21 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @whytonchik | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 40 hours | @whytonchik (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 8 April 2026 to 1 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @whytonchik. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 08:07 | 120 | -1 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 121 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 122 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 123 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 129 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:10 | 129 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 8 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
⚠️ Хакеры взломали криптомост Gravity Bridge: ущерб индустрии превысил $328 млн Злоумышленники получили доступ к контракту и вывели активы на $5,4 млн (USDC, WETH, USDT, PAXG) ➡️ Часть средств уже выведена через биржи, на кошельке хакера остается ~$4,2 млн в ETH ➡️ Валидаторы остановили работу сети, токен GRAV просел на 4% Это 8-й крупный взлом моста в 2026 году
🍸 В StonksGift вышел новый режим - турнир Раунд длится 6 часов, нужно удержаться в топе. Топ-3 места делят между собой банк Ещё один игрок рандомно получает бонусный приз 😎 Залетаем в турик и забираем банк: @StonksGiftBot
С пятницы трейдеров ликвиднуло на $1.5 млрд, из которых 90% — лонги 😱
Pudgy Penguins x MetaMask Минт SBT и Pudgy World 😏 Pudgy Penguins и MetaMask запустили совместную коллабу с минтом SBT NFT. Лендинг повторяет интерфейс прошлого дропа пингвинов. Возможен дроп как от MetaMask, так и второй от Pudgy. Подключаем кошелек и минтим. Всего 3 NFT: для держателя обычного MetaMask-кошелька; для тех, у кого на MM лежит Big или Lil Pudgy Penguin NFT; для холдеров только Big Pudgy Penguin NFT. …
Дроп SNAP для юзеров Farcaster Олды помнят когда мы пушили фаркастер, сейчас можно залутать дроп токена SNAP - можно проверить тут. 17% дают сразу, остальное уходит в вестинг на полгода. Если юзали Farcaster, то есть смысл чекнуть, вдруг что-то насыпало.
Лутаем 25% скидки проп от Upscale Фастом можно забрать 1000 счетов по акции, больше такой халявы не будет. Сейчас на счета от $5K до $50K действует -25% по промокоду YC2SQ. На счета по $100K работает -20% по промокоду R4O3H. А на счета по $200K дают -15% по промокоду N2291. Лютая халява особенно на таком рынке. Я как вы знаете уже давно торгую на пропе, может скоро и сюда покидаю пару сделок.
Вижу там админы начали шилить, надеюсь вы успели взять, ато думаю там нифига уже скоро не будет
🪙 Глобальный адопшен Биткоина сейчас составляет около 3% — это уровень интернета в 90-е и соцсетей до массового взрыва Обычно только после 5% начинается резкий рост за счёт сетевого эффекта
Пора плотно воркать Upscale Сегодня до 23:59 UTC дают сразу два буста бесплатно, а именно 90% профит-сплит и защита от дневной просадки (для ускоренных аккаунтов) По факту меньше риска и больше отдачи с тех же сделок. Плюс сверху запустили розыгрыш 9 счетов от 1к до 100к с максимально простым входом. Для участия в конкурсе надо кликнуть участвовать у них в канале, а чтобы взять челендж и поднять немного переходим …
🐋 Киты начали резко покупать $BTC и $ETH — данные Santiment
ПОЙМАЛ КЕПКУ ДУРОВА В STONKSGIFT 😱 🎁 Легчайшие 7.5 иксов с двух спинов в кейсе Durov’s Cap: @StonksGiftBot 🎁 Промокод на бесплатный кейс: DUROV77
🪙 STRC Майкла Сейлора сегодня приобрел 4500 BTC на сумму $326 млн — это крупнейшая однодневная покупка биткойнов через STRC
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @cryptowisdomowl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoWisdom” (@cryptowisdomowl), 120 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptowisdomowl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.