Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for We will, we will coach you

Channel

We will, we will coach you

@wewillcoachyou

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

288subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001398817367
TypeChannel
Username@wewillcoachyou
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wewillcoachyou

Growth

2822882857 August 2026 — 282 subscribers8 August 2026 — 282 subscribers16 August 2026 — 288 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 281–289 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 06:58288+6
8 Aug 2026, 08:31282no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:01282first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 11 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.9%
avg views ÷ 288 subscribers
Avg views / post
123
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held15 (11 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total864
Reactions total92
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

208 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11253.8%
🔥4823.1%
❤‍🔥2411.5%
💯94.33%
🥰83.85%
👍73.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 208reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC75 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дайджест постов Специально каждый перечитала и примерила: устарел? актуален? Оставила только те, что можно читать вечно 🤌🏻 🤬🤬🤬 Читаю вслух Вы видите текст, а я еще и карандашом по строчкам вожу. Faith and Hope Go Shopping by Joanne Harris Часть 1 https://t.me/wewillcoachyou/129 Часть 2 https://t.me/wewillcoachyou/129 Новое яркое слово Раз https://t.me/wewillcoachyou/158 Два https://t.me/wewillcoachyou/197 Оф

❤‍🔥32👍1

Signed Victoria Lorents

3 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC98 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Закономерно на пост с продажей посыпались отписки. Это нормально - я не регулирую ожидания. Может, кто-то подписался, чтобы читать только необычное междисциплинарное вроде постов про реактанс или дивергентные/конвергентные вопросы или лиминальность. Кто-то ждет полезного вроде чек-листа для взрослого ученика или серии постов про Dogme. Или кто-то подписался по следам моих комментариев в немецком сообществе и ожидает

❤‍🔥13🔥53

Signed Victoria Lorents

30 Jul 2026, 10:19 UTC138 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Если бы не было никаких ожиданий от вас и вашего английского, как вы будете говорить? Давайте узнаем на разговорном клубе для тех, кто в языке перебрал с "надо" и иногда мечтает вернуть себе "хочу". Вы новенькую "Одиссею" уже посмотрели? будете смотреть? ни в коем случае не будете? Как вам Елена Троянская - нормальный театр или мискаст? Как вам актерский диапазон Роберта Патиссона? Получилось у Нолана снять что-то

🔥10🥰2

Signed Victoria Lorents

30 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC122 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вот полно клубов. Чего не хватает? Предположим, у меня как у участника больше нет интереса к безопасной песочнице, и я отрастила базовые навыки участия в разговорных клубах. В клубы 1 типа я больше не хочу. Допустим, я как участник знаю свои ошибки, занимаюсь ими на индивидуальных занятиях, а на разговорном клубе не хочу контроля и чтобы меня научили чему-то. Клубы 2 типа мне не подходят. И, наконец, я как участни

❤‍🔥6

Signed Victoria Lorents

26 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTC151 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

11

Signed Victoria Lorents

26 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC132 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Summer slacking дает много пространства для вдохновения. Этот пост написан в невыносимо прекрасных условиях! Поговорили про то, что ошибки исправлять продуктивнее на индивидуальных занятиях. Это не значит, что все разговорные клубы надо закрыть. Их вообще очень трудно открыть, да и найти себе нелегко. Не будем разбрасываться клубами, товарищи! Давайте лучше посмотрим, кому какой подойдет. Сначала думала, длинно не

7🔥4

Signed Victoria Lorents

22 Jul 2026, 04:00 UTC148 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Тема с ошибками / дриллами / клубами как будто не закрыта. Делайте кофе, будет длинно. Комментарий из дублера блога в вк: А вот я бы пошла на разговорный за дриллами. Мы вот с вами на немецком так знатно картинку описывали как-то раз. И поговорили, и ошибки поисправляли. И вот так бы точечно, по разным грамматическим и лексическим пунктам. Предлоги там или падежи, всякое. Сам себе не надриллишь, лень, а в компании

20🔥3👍1💯1

Signed Victoria Lorents

16 Jul 2026, 19:16 UTC209 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Приходите на разговорный клуб! Там мы уютно поговорим о ментальном здоровье, балансе работы/жизни и о наших хобби, а потом я исправлю каждому его ошибки! Повысим уровень языка вместе! God, no. За этим не ко мне. Есть, есть такая идея: мы растем в языке через исправление ошибок. Спорить не стану, действительно, внимание к ошибкам - важный этап обучения. Но поворот, когда нас убедили, что везде нужно найти и исправит

21

Signed Victoria Lorents

3 Jul 2026, 17:47 UTC233 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥4

Signed Victoria Lorents

3 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC210 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Почему я бросила Duolingo и (опять) взялась за Anki Почти год я успешно ковыряла Дуолинго. Демонизировать его не буду - это отличный, очень гибкий в своих рамках, инструмент, когда: 👍всё тяжело, 3-5 минут - мой максимум 👍хочется попробовать новый язык быстро, без особой ответственности и бесплатно 👍есть странные запросы, например, учить корейский через английский, немецкий через польский и другие экзотические экз

15🔥3

Signed Victoria Lorents

25 Jun 2026, 06:08 UTC169 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ценнейший ракурс: что нужно понимать, чтобы чужие формулировки не управляли нашими действиями, AI-edition

Signed Victoria Lorents

25 Jun 2026, 06:08 UTC234 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @etonailya

мне кажется, практически всей ИИ-индустрии не хватает вдумчивой коммуникационной стратегии есть одна формулировка, после которой я не читаю продолжение. «ИИ уже». уже пишет, уже автоматизировал, уже уволил, уже интегрирован, уже заработал. и все без тебя, естественно. вообще этот разговор относится к вотчине бренд- и коммуникационных стратегий и навеян встречей в нашей внутренней лабе — мы разбирали рекламный рынок

7

Signed Victoria Lorents

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @wewillcoachyou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 511,570 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“We will, we will coach you” (@wewillcoachyou), 288 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wewillcoachyou.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.