Создаем высоконагруженные веб‑сервисы для проектов корпораций, продвигаем в диджитал-каналах сложные и крупные проекты
Вопросы, предложения и респекты принимает PR-менеджер @n_alyabieva
📧 info@webpractik.ru
📲 +7 495 540-51-79
webpractik.ru
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 696–698 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Aug 2026, 16:37
697
no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:04
697
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.0%
avg views ÷ 697 subscribers
Avg views / post
196
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
8 (23 June 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
391
Reactions total
47
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
469
Videos
22
Links
240
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
196 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5334588877598375899
79
40.3%
custom 5334817507297475921
58
29.6%
custom 5409268450386263558
30
15.3%
custom 5332502133377876896
19
9.69%
👏
8
4.08%
🎉
2
1.02%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 196reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Специалист по платному трафику «Вебпрактик» Дарья Ацина стала одним из экспертов июльского дайджеста PPC World, посвященного главным событиям рынка контекстной рекламы.
🎙 Дарья рассказала об обновлении конструктора лендингов в Яндекс Директе, какие возможности для тестирования гипотез дает адаптивная структура и как это помогает автоматизировать работу с лидами.
Главная ценность обновлений — возможность быстрее про…
Когда продвигаешь продукт для узкой технической аудитории, стандартные рекламные подходы работают не всегда.
В кейсе Data Fusion Contest мы проверили гипотезу: может ли профессиональный юмор стать инструментом performance-маркетинга. Оказалось, что если говорить с аудиторией на ее языке, это влияет не только на вовлеченность, но и на бизнес-результат.
За шесть недель собрали 1540 регистраций на один из крупнейших в…
🔥 Workspace опубликовал свежие рейтинги диджитал-агентств 2026
Для нас это еще одно подтверждение сильных позиций сразу в нескольких направлениях:
🤩12 среди SEO-компаний России
🤩12 среди SMM-агентств
🤩16 среди агентств полного цикла
🤩23 среди разработчиков сайтов
🤩24 среди агентств маркетинга и рекламы.
Особенность рейтингов Workspace в том, что они тесно связаны с проектами агентств. Существенную роль играют реали…
🔜 Продолжаем делиться опытом
3 июля на Agentic Dev Conf 2026 Иван Поддубный расскажет, как мы внедрили единый процесс разработки на проекте с десятилетней историей и почему именно Spec-Driven Development становится основой AI-native разработки.
🎙 Иван расскажет:
🔴 как решить проблему общего контекста внутри команды и при взаимодействии с бизнесом;
🔴 как организовать работу с требованиями — от use case до Gherkin;
🔴…
Начинаем июль со встречи AI-архитекторов.
1 июля CTO «Вебпрактик» Иван Поддубный выступит на Arch.Meetup by Sber. На встрече эксперты обсудят архитектурные практики AI в PDLC и то, как проектировать современные системы в эпоху агентных технологий.
🎙 Тема доклада: «От первых ассистентов до сквозного SDD: как мы внедряли AI в SDLC»
Полтора года назад мы начали системно внедрять AI в процессы разработки. За это время …
«Вебпрактик» снова в числе лидеров Рейтинга Рунета 🎉
Мы сохранили лидерские позиции в ключевых для компании направлениях и заметно усилились сразу в нескольких рейтингах.
💾 Наши главные результаты:
№1 в России по разработке и продвижению сайтов
№1 среди подрядчиков госсектора в направлении Реклама и трафик
№5 среди полносервисных диджитал-агентств страны
№9 в новом рейтинге GEO — оптимизации под генеративный поиск
…
В этом году на Saint TeamLead Conf 2026 будет сразу три выступления нашего CTO Ивана Поддубного.
🎙 25 июня, круглый стол «Матрицы компетенций: от внедрения до пользы»
Матрицы компетенций используют для разных задач: от проведения performance review до построения карьерных треков, формирования команд и оптимизации рекрутмента. Участники круглого стола обсудят, какую пользу такие инструменты приносят сотрудникам, руко…
Что сегодня становится главной ценностью для digital-команд и агентств?
Раньше клиенты искали подрядчиков, которые хорошо делают сайты, брендинг, интерфейсы или цифровые продукты. Сегодня бизнес все чаще оценивает не количество часов и макетов, а способность команды понять задачу, предложить решение и довести его до результата.
Об этом будут говорить участники лектория Дизайнеры и агентства, который проводят aaa.de…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @webpractik_agency. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 179,164 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вебпрактик” (@webpractik_agency), 697 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/webpractik_agency.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
