Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

НЕЙРОБИТВА | 2026

@neyrobitva

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

485subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003255386725
TypeChannel
Username@neyrobitva
DescriptionЧеллендж генеративного дизайна С 2.02 по 27.02 По всем вопросам пишите @AuxRostov
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/neyrobitva

Growth

4857 Aug 2026, 18:22 — 485 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:32 — 485 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:228 Aug 2026, 04:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 484–486 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 04:32485no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:22485first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.9%
avg views ÷ 485 subscribers
Avg views / post
111
1 post measured
Reaction rate
24.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held20 (17 March 202624 July 2026)
Views total111
Reactions total27
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
87
Videos
1
Links
47

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

530 reactions across 20 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥21740.9%
🎉427.92%
407.55%
👍397.36%
🏆315.85%
❤‍🔥275.09%
🙏254.72%
👌152.83%
🤣152.83%
👏122.26%
🤝101.89%
91.70%
😢91.70%
👀81.51%
😁61.13%
50.943%
🙈50.943%
👨‍💻40.755%
😍30.566%
😐20.377%
4 further kinds61.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 530reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
43
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @neyrobitva. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 March 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC111 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kolpikovdesign

Posted without readable text

🔥147👍5❤‍🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC210 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kolpikovdesignPhoto

🚀 НУ ЧТО, Я ИЩУ РАБОТУ! Друзья, настало время попрощаться с агентством «Вебпрактик». Это был больше чем год, за который я безмерно благодарен команде: многому научился и поработал с действительно крутыми проектами. Значит, пора открыть следующую дверь. Ну что ж, открываю — и сразу рассказываю, кто в неё стучится. Присаживайтесь, будет длинно 😄 В дизайн я пришёл в 1995-м — когда многие из вас ещё не родились, а «пик

🔥8👍3👏2

24 Jun 2026, 08:49 UTC579 views25 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Скоро на всех рынках страны!

🤣15😁6👨‍💻4

23 Jun 2026, 08:23 UTC267 views36 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kolpikovdesignPhoto

Привет 👋 Я давно ничего не писал и подзабросил свои каналы. Хочу немного объясниться — что вообще происходило в моей жизни последние месяцы. А происходило, честно говоря, много чего. Накрыла такая полоса, когда события сыплются одно за другим. Сначала прооперировали маму. Сейчас, слава Богу, с ней всё хорошо, но ей нужен уход и помощь, а живёт она в другом городе — за 300 км от меня. Это отдельная история про доро

🙏236🤝5🔥2

22 May 2026, 08:25 UTC456 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Друзья, старт челленджа перенесём на следующую пятницу. Нет сейчас возможности во всё это погрузиться, поэтому давайте встретимся через недельку — продуманные задания точно будут.

👌156🤝5😍3👍1

21 May 2026, 09:49 UTC890 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Друзья, решение принято — завтра запускаем новый челлендж! ✦ ✦ ✦ «Плакат по пятницам» (ППП) ✦ ✦ ✦ Как это будет работать: 🎨 Каждую пятницу — новое задание (в духе Нейробитвы): тема, стиль, обязательные элементы или что-то ещё неожиданное. 🕐 Весь день пятницы создаём плакаты и кидаем в комментарии. Не успели? Дорабатываем на выходных. 🏆 По понедельникам подводим итоги и выбираем тройку победителей недели. Призов

🔥297👏6

21 May 2026, 07:44 UTC373 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Что насчёт Нейробитвы-2?

  1. Очень хочу и жду!53%
  2. Лучше в следующем году22%
  3. Да пофигу16%
  4. Нет, хватит одной13%
  5. Что это? Ничего не понимаю11%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥7

27 Apr 2026, 10:50 UTC440 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @nestervedroPhoto

Коллеги, всех поздравляю, всех обнимаю 🙌

👍211

10 Apr 2026, 13:18 UTC506 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kolpikovdesignPhoto

У Фигмы появился свой аггрегатор нейросеток Weave. Наверное, самый навороченный из всех. Там есть абсолютно все популярные модели и куча каких-то малоизвестных вроде Sana, Bria, Kolors, Relight, Enhancor, Moonvalley, Pixverse, Hanyuan и т.п. Очень прикольная нодовая структура. Невероятно быстрые генерации. Но очень дорого. За 19 баксов дают всего 4000 кредитов. Одна генерация бананы про в 4к стоит 30. Выходит 133 ка

🔥8👍2🍌1

19 Mar 2026, 17:34 UTC570 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kolpikovdesignPhoto

Давно подступался к этой теме. Переосмысление современного дизайна с точки зрения химии. О том, как атомарный дизайн себя исчерпал, и ему на смену приходят новые методологии. Если не боитесь многабукаф, а химические термины вас не удручают, то почитайте статью. https://dsgners.ru/kolpikov/40035-himiya-dizayna-v-epohu-neyrosetey

👀83👍3🤯2

18 Mar 2026, 14:16 UTC920 views46 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот и всё. И вот они, победители НЕЙРОБИТВЫ-2026: 🥉 Бронза (3 место): Дмитрий Фомичёв (@Dreepsy) 🥈 Серебро (2 место): Илья Кримнуз (@Krimnuz) 🥇 Золото (1 место): Екатерина Фролова - Лугиня (@Luginya_Kat) От души поздравляю всех победителей с заслуженной победой. Всех участников поздравляю с завершением полуторамесячного марафона. Всех искренне благодарю за терпение, за классную атмосферу, за восхитительные эмоци

❤‍🔥21🔥12😢85

18 Mar 2026, 13:59 UTC528 views36 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Барабанная дробь................ 🥇 Золото (1 место): АБСОЛЮТНЫЙ ПОБЕДИТЕЛЬ НЕЙРОБИТВЫ! Екатерина Фролова - Лугиня (@Luginya_Kat) 👏👏👏 Они с Ильёй действительно шли почти вровень, буквально рука об руку, и разница между результатами оказалась минимальной — всего в один балл. Но именно этот балл и определил итог Нейробитвы: победителем становится Екатерина. Её работы очень точно попали в сердца жюри: яркие, эмоцио

🔥21🏆8🎉61

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @neyrobitva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 May 2026, 07:44 UTCAnonymous Poll55 voters

Что насчёт Нейробитвы-2?

  1. Очень хочу и жду!53%
  2. Лучше в следующем году22%
  3. Да пофигу16%
  4. Нет, хватит одной13%
  5. Что это? Ничего не понимаю11%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2026 to 24 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 531,919 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НЕЙРОБИТВА | 2026” (@neyrobitva), 485 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neyrobitva.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.