Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
BLACKLIST WEASLEY HOSPITAL
@weasleybl
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002223410078 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @weasleybl |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/weasleybl |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:19 | 9 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 9 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 10 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 9
- Links
- 12
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
SURAT PEMECATAN DAN BLACKLIST PERMANEN Nomor: 009/SK-PB/VI/2026 08 JUNI 2026 Dengan ini, pihak SHARKSKILLER secara resmi menetapkan pemecatan dan blacklist permanen kepada: ㅤㅤㅤㅤ𝗔𝗖𝗖𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗧 𝗢𝗟𝗗 Nama: Rezvian Ardaniel D' Vantra Username : [ t.me/Redattores3xy + 8578202169 ] Jabatan: Owner & Leader Editing Gen 01 ㅤㅤㅤㅤ𝗔𝗖𝗖𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗧 𝗡𝗘𝗪 Nama: 𖣇 ɆⱤⱠ₳𐌍─ جلالة + 若様 ⚊ 𖥳Vyrenze's Username : [ t.me/M0onjunhu1 + t.me/rendryze + 84150…
Sticker, posted without a caption
ᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠ𝗦𝗨𝗥𝗔𝗧 𝗞𝗘𝗣𝗨𝗧𝗨𝗦𝗔𝗡 ᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠ𝐒𝐇𝐀𝐑𝐊𝐒 𝐊𝚰𝐋𝐋𝐄𝐑 ════════════════════════════ Roleplayer, 05 Juni 2026 Nomor: 08/SK/I/2026 Lampiran: 1 Perihal: 𝗕𝗟𝗔𝗖𝗞𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗧 ᅠᅠDengan adanya surat keputusan ini, Kami dari 𝐒𝐇𝐀𝐑𝐊𝐒 𝐊𝚰𝐋𝐋𝐄𝐑 secara resmi memutuskan untuk memasukkan admin dengan identitas dibawah dalam daftar hitam atau 𝗕𝗟𝗔𝗖𝗞𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗧. Nama: Jonathan Username : [ @OGoggle + 8523343652 ] Divisi: Editing ᅠᅠKeputusan ini diambil dengan me…
Sticker, posted without a caption
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 𝗦𝗨𝗥𝗔𝗧 𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗬𝗔𝗧𝗔𝗔𝗡 𝗕𝗟𝗔𝗖𝗞𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗧 「 𝗘𝗡-𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗖𝗘𝗥 」 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Nomor :: 003/06/04/XX/XXV Perihal :: Surat Pernyataan Blacklist Lampiran :: 001 Roleplayer, 09 Juni 2026 Dengan diturunkannya Surat Pernyataan Blacklist, setelah melakukan evaluasi menyeluruh, kami dari 𝗘𝗡-𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗖𝗘𝗥 dengan ini memberitahukan perihal blacklist terkait tin…
Sticker, posted without a caption
𝗦𝗨𝗥𝗔𝗧 𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗬𝗔𝗧𝗔𝗔𝗡 𝗕𝗟𝗔𝗖𝗞𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗧 Decreed by : 「 𝐒𝐈𝐓𝐄𝐒 𝐂𝐎𝐌𝐈𝐂 - 𝐑𝐔𝐁𝐑𝐈𝐗 」 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 𝖱𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗒𝖾𝗋, 8 Juni 𝟤𝟢𝟤6 Nomor : 05/SP-BL/VI/2026 Perihal : Surat Pernyataan Blacklist Hak Edar : @OFCRUBRIX ────────────────────────── Selamat pagi/siang/sore/malam. Salam enam agama. Berdasarkan hasil evaluasi menyeluruh ya…
Sticker, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @weasleybl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 922,693 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 9
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 9
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@weasleybl named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BLACKLIST WEASLEY HOSPITAL” (@weasleybl), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/weasleybl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.