Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
𝗦𝗜𝗧𝗘𝗦 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗜𝗖
@OFCSITESCOMICS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
32,656subscribers
-286 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002016110792 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @OFCSITESCOMICS |
| Description | ⚔️ From Shadows to Lumière, Sites Comic Rises SUB UNIT : @OFCRUBRIX CHANNEL : ↳ @OFCSITESCOMICS ↳ @OFCSITESCOMIC ↳ @SITESHITPOST ↳ @SICOFESS ↳ @MEMOSICO ↳ @DISPATCHSICO BOT : ↳ @SITESCOMICSBOT [OFC] ↳ @SICOPSROBOT [ OPEN ] ↳ @SPIVOPFPBOT [OPEN] |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/OFCSITESCOMICS |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 32,656 | -42 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 32,698 | -42 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 32,740 | -41 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 32,781 | -83 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 32,864 | -25 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 32,889 | -35 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 32,924 | -18 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 32,942 | first reading |
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.07%
- avg views ÷ 32,656 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 351
- 36 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.29%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 36
- of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (29 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,633 |
| Reactions total | 167 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 583
- Videos
- 61
- Links
- 125
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
167 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 53 | 31.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 45 | 26.9% | |
| 🔥 | 37 | 22.2% | |
| ☃ | 9 | 5.39% | |
| 💘 | 7 | 4.19% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 2.40% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 2.40% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 2.40% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 1.80% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.599% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 36 we hold a reading for · 3%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @OFCSITESCOMICS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 36 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
CLOSING — “DON'T LET YOUR MIND WRITE THE WHOLE STORY” ㅤㅤㅤ𓂃۶ৎ ⭐️ : Gak kerasa udah di akhir pembahasan. Jadi, setelah ngobrol panjang sebenernya apa yang harus kita lakuin kalo kita mulai overthinking tentang seseorang? ㅤㅤㅤ𓂃۶ৎ 🪷 : Menurut aku, kita jangan langsung percaya sama pikiran pertama yang muncul. Pisahkan fakta dari asumsi. Jangan sampe kita hilang arah cuman karena terlalu sibuk mikirin seseorang. ㅤㅤㅤ𓂃۶ৎ …
❤🔥5❤2
Sticker, posted without a caption
“SAMPAI BATAS MANA OVERTHINKING MASIH DIANGGAP WAJAR?” ㅤㅤㅤ𓂃۶ৎ ⭐️: Hal yang perlu kita pahami juga, Sitecoss. Overthinking sesekali bukan berarti seseorang langsung mengalami gangguan kesehatan mental. Setiap orang pasti pernah mengalami masa ketika pikirannya lebih ramai dari biasanya. ㅤㅤㅤ𓂃۶ৎ ⭐️ : Nah, yang perlu diperhatikan adalah ketika pikiran tersebut mulai mengganggu kehidupan sehari-hari. Misalnya, membuat k…
❤🔥3❤2
Sticker, posted without a caption
“SEBERAPA BESAR PENGARUH OVERTHINKING TERHADAP KESEHATAN KITA?” ㅤㅤㅤ𓂃۶ৎ 🪷 : Tapi kalian tahu nggak, kalau ternyata Overthinking yang berlebihan itu bisa merusak mental kita. Karena memicu pelepasan hormon stres seperti kortisol secara terus-menerus. Kayak "tadi aku jawab kayak gitu salah ngga ya" atau "tadi aku bilang kayak gitu dia sakit hati ngga ya" dan berbagai macam lainnya. ㅤㅤㅤ𓂃۶ৎ 🪷 : Di kondisi ini bisa membu…
❤🔥5❤3
Sticker, posted without a caption
“KETIKA MASA LALU TERUS DIPUTAR, ITU OVERTHINKING JUGA?” ㅤㅤㅤ𓂃۶ৎ 🦋 : Betul, overthinking nggak selalu tentang apa yang sedang terjadi atau yang mungkin terjadi di masa depan. Kadang, kita justru terlalu lama terjebak pada sesuatu yang sudah terjadi. ㅤㅤㅤ𓂃۶ৎ 🦋 : Pernah nggak, selesai berdebat sama seseorang, tapi beberapa jam kemudian percakapannya masih terus muter di kepala? Misalnya, "kalau waktu itu aku lebih saba…
❤4❤🔥3👏2🍓1
Sticker, posted without a caption
“OVERTHINKING BISA TERJADI SAMA YANG PUNYA PASANGAN AJA?” ㅤㅤㅤ𓂃۶ৎ ⭐️ : Nah, menariknya overthinking dalam hubungan itu gak cuman terjadi sama pasangan. Jadi, kalau kalian mikir, "Gua kan nggak pacaran, berarti aman dari overthinking." Eitss, sayangnya belum tentu. ㅤㅤㅤ𓂃۶ৎ ⭐️ : Bahkan dalam pertemanan kita bisa ngerasain hal yang sama. Misalnya, temen yang biasanya sering ngobrol bareng kita tiba-tiba lebih sering bar…
❤6❤🔥4💘2
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @OFCSITESCOMICS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 732 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 260 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@KAWANSICO · 6010 posts1.14 ── &' 𝗚𝗟𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗢𝗨𝗦, 𝗟𝗘𝗜𝗔𝗥𝗘𝗦 𝗦𝗤𝗨𝗔𝗗
@LEIARESSQUAD · 8,4508 postsVAKUM | ”RYDESTER HIDE:ØUT ..+/🫀🪬
@RYDESTER · 9,8348 postsHIATUS | 𝕿𝐇𝐄 𝐍𝐘𝖃𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐒 𝕺𝐅𝐅𝐈𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋
@OFCTHENYXERIS · 11,9067 posts[HIATUS] 𝐂𝐇𝐑𝐎𝐌𝐄 𝐎𝐅 𝐂𝐇𝐑𝐎𝐍𝐎𝐒
@OFCCHRONOS · 9,6036 postsVENTAN OFC
@VENTANOFC · 5,4626 postsSITESCOMIC ARCHIVE
@arsipsico · 8105 posts𝗗𝗜𝗥𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗩𝗘 𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗢𝗫
@DIRECTVENOX · 21,5655 postsMEMORIES SICO
@MEMOSICO · 1355 posts𝟮𝟰𝟵. 𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗧𝗛𝗔𝗟𝗬𝗦 𝗢𝗙𝗖
@OFCMORTHALYS · 5,3755 posts𝗩𝗔𝗞𝗨𝗠 // 𝐒𝐇𝐀𝐑𝐊𝐒 𝐊𝐈𝐋𝐋𝐄𝐑
@SHARKSKILLER · 17,0985 postsARCTIC ACADEMY 🎓
@ARCTICACADEMY · 12,2304 posts𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗘 𝗟𝗜𝗘𝗕𝗘𝗡 𝗖𝗬𝗧𝗘𝗚𝗡𝗢!
@CYTEGNOCITY · 5,7024 posts乇𝐋𝐏𝐇𝐈𝐃𝐑𝐀 𝐀𝐆𝐄𝐍𝐂𝐘
@ELPHIDRAGENCY · 6864 posts[HIATUS] 𝗘𝗡-𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗖𝗘𝗥 '⅋─𝗡Ξ𝗪 𝝨𝗥Λ
@OFCENFORCER · 21,5734 postsHOLIDAY • 𝐆𝐈𝐍𝐄𝐕𝐑𝐀 𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐃𝐄𝐑𝐆𝐀𝐑𝐓𝐄𝐍
@OFCGINEVRA · 6,0434 posts𝗠𝗘𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗜𝗘𝗦 OFC LEGERITY BYTE
@ofclegeritybyte · 8,8844 posts𝗥Ξ𝗜𝗞Ξ𝗧𝗦𝗨-𝗞𝗜 [冷血記]
@OFCREIKETSU · 9,1754 posts𝐇𝐈𝐑𝐌𝐈𝐍 || 𝐎𝐅𝐅𝐈𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐕𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐀𝐍𝐓
@OFCTHEVALIANT · 8,3364 posts光狼. KŌUGARŌ
@OFFICIALKOUGARO · 6,1364 postsØ𝐅𝐂—𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐎𝐋𝐒 𝐆𝐀𝐍𝐊
@REVOLSGANK · 15,3904 posts𝐒𝐖𝐀𝐍𝐋𝐀𝐊𝐄 𝐒𝐂𝐇𝐎𝐎𝐋
@SWANLAKEOFC · 6,5654 postsTONAKOST OFC
@TONAKOSTOFCC · 10,3874 posts𝗩𝗨𝗟𝗞𝗔𝗡𝗨𝗦 : 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗘𝗥𝗔
@VULKANUSOFC · 16,6784 posts
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗦𝗜𝗧𝗘𝗦 𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗜𝗖” (@OFCSITESCOMICS), 32,656 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OFCSITESCOMICS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.