Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Около войны

@warnearby

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

321subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002166309108
TypeChannel
Username@warnearby
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/warnearby

Growth

3217 Aug 2026, 13:38 — 321 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:31 — 321 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:388 Aug 2026, 07:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 320–322 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 07:31321no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:38321first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.1%
avg views ÷ 321 subscribers
Avg views / post
138
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (20 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,352
Reactions total166
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
254
Videos
127
Links
74

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 22s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

166 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6237.3%
😡169.64%
custom 5447442716713573847159.04%
😐127.23%
🤯127.23%
💯116.63%
🫡106.02%
😁84.82%
🤔84.82%
custom 544713033085723182763.61%
😢63.61%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 166reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC22 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @battle_unitPhoto

ПАМЯТКА Действия гражданского лица на трассе при атаке БПЛА и работе мобильных огневых групп (МОГ) Мобильные огневые группы (МОГ) ведут борьбу с беспилотными летательными аппаратами, применяя пулемёты, зенитные установки и стрелковое оружие с обочин дорог, пикапов и специальных автомобилей. Главная задача гражданского водителя в такой ситуации , не мешать работе расчётов, не перекрывать сектор обстрела и максимальн

👍5custom 54471303308572318272🫡1custom 54474427167135738471

5 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC58 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @dez_informatorVideo

#не_вредные_советы

👍6💯3custom 54474427167135738472😁1

3 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC99 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kolokol_mediaVideo

ВСУ ударили по мирным отдыхающим на пляже под Геленджиком: дрон убил четверых человек, 13 человек получили ранения, среди них есть дети. Update: До семи возросло количество погибших в результате атаки БПЛА в Архипо-Осиповке, сообщает оперштаб Кубани. По уточненным данным, различные травмы получили 40 человек.

😢2🤯1😡1

1 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC115 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @notes_veterans

Националтный Антитеррористический Комитет России сообщил о подрыве самодельного взрывного устройства в ресторане на Кудринской площади в Москве. Взрыв прогремел в 19:55 по мск, погибли три человека; взорвалось самодельное взрывное устройство. Один из погибших — охранник, который не впускал в заведение женщину с бомбой; Вторая погибшая — сама неизвестная со взрывным устройством; Третья жертва — один из посетителе

🤯2😡2😢2

31 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTC188 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Противники разбрасывают с дронов такие аналоги мины ПФМ-1 "Лепесток". Будьте бдительны, смотрите под ноги

🫡3😡2custom 54474427167135738472

30 Jul 2026, 07:12 UTC136 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mod_russia

❗️ Сегодня ночью Вооруженными Силами Российской Федерации нанесен массированный удар высокоточным оружием воздушного, наземного и морского базирования большой дальности, а также ударными беспилотными летательными аппаратами по предприятиям военной промышленности, телекоммуникационным и логистическим центрам в городах Киев, Львов, Ивано-Франковской, Ровенской и Днепропетровской областях, по сухогрузам в порту «Южный»

👍15custom 54474427167135738473🫡2custom 54471303308572318271

29 Jul 2026, 16:13 UTC133 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rosich_russiaVideo

В лучших традициях ближнего востока. "Росич" в MAX | TG | VK

👍8💯2🫡2custom 54474427167135738472

28 Jul 2026, 16:14 UTC148 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Иран вполне имеет возможность присоединиться к ударам по Украине 😁

👍6💯2😁2custom 54474427167135738472

26 Jul 2026, 12:09 UTC159 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

https://t.me/rsotmdivision https://t.me/RSOTMLIFE

👍5😁3💯2custom 54471303308572318271

26 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC162 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @center_svarogPhoto

📍Контрабандистам, наркоторговцам, участникам банд и лидерам преступных сообществ разрешат заключать контракты с Минобороны во время мобилизации. Соответствующий законопроект приняла Госдума. *новость от 22.07.2026 📍Новой волны мобилизации в России не будет, заявил член Комитета Госдумы по обороне Андрей Колесник. *новость от 24.07.2026

🤔2😁2custom 54471303308572318272

24 Jul 2026, 11:26 UTC194 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Война набирает обороты, оппоненты активно наносят удары по тылам, регулярно бьют по гражданским. Весьма вероятна новая мобилизация и иные негативные события. Поэтому тем, кто ещё не в теме, рекомендуем ЗАРАНЕЕ подготовить перечень необходимого снаряжения по программе-минимум: 1. Обувь с высокими берцами для фиксации голеностопа и снижения риска травм, стельки лучше всего иметь антипрокольные. 2. Спальный мешок. На э

👍11💯2🫡2custom 54474427167135738472

24 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC171 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @a_beglov

Сегодня утром Петербург подвергся атаке беспилотных средств военного назначения. Работают средства ПВО. Удар пришелся на объекты гражданской инфраструктуры на Московском шоссе. В настоящее время идет ликвидация последствий . Оперативный штаб, который возглавляю лично, координирует деятельность городских служб и межведомственное взаимодействие.

😡3🤯2😐2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @warnearby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Около войны” (@warnearby), 321 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/warnearby.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.