Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 6 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 175.4%
- avg views ÷ 83 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 146
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.42%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 13
- Videos
- 5
- Links
- 18
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 11s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
26 Sept 2026, 09:46 UTC141 views2 reactionsread 27 September 2026 Forwarded from @sigmaridePhoto
豌豆
联系: @wandouu9
西格玛男人本次品鉴嫩妹豌豆。
硬件: 9.3
真07 年嫩妹,人照 9 成,基本和验证视频一致。身高 170,100 斤左右,不胖不瘦,身材匀称极轻微肉感。
🐻自然 C 腺体感比较强,揉捏很舒适。 身材比例丰满而高挑。 肤色正常黄皮偏白一点,全身无纹身,肌肤光滑嫩弹,肌肉紧致不松垮。 小穴内外都是粉嫩🎯紧致毛量极少,
颜值整体属于耐看型😍,初看不算惊艳,但细看清秀甜美,五官自然无整容痕迹。整体给人的感觉是健康、匀称且有气质☺️。 略显遗憾的是,当天开课时间仓促妆容不够精致。
整体硬件符合这个价位应有的质量。
软件: 9.6
性格偏温婉柔和,待课热情有礼貌,周到细腻有细节,挺有女子力的🌱,心态很好,不挑客不机车好沟通。
整体接触下来很真实不端着,印象很深的是妹子自己说让我如实评价就好,做的不好的地方她会改进,豌豆态度很端正,软件方面没问题。😇
过程:9.…
❤2
26 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC123 viewsread 27 September 2026 晚上有位置哦还
26 Sept 2026, 08:31 UTC166 viewsread 27 September 2026 Photo
🎰 闵行嫩妹【豌豆】@wandou520 福利劵
📮 参与条件
🪪 必须设置用户名
🎫 加入-上海艺术展览会备用群
🎫 加入-豌豆的后花园
🎫 加入-上海艺术展览会交流群
└ 🎟️ 发言数大于 6 条
🎫 加入-上海艺术展览会榜单
🎫 加入-上海艺术展览会(中转平台)
🎫 加入-上海艺术展览会人气推荐榜
🎁 奖品名单
💰️ 福利700p1100pp × 2
📜 抽奖说明
中奖者截图发给老师兑换 @wandou520
开奖后3天内完成出击 如特殊情况可延后
优惠劵获得者出击后必须写报告完不成请勿报名(近期没有上课意向的狼友 请勿参与 不去联系管理报备说明原因)
‼️报告要求 不能三言两语的敷衍,体验情况要写明
‼️禁止转让私下交易(如发现全网封杀)
点击查看【豌豆】个人资料:⬇️
https://t.me/yishuzanlanhui/38471
📆 开奖时间
• 北京时间 2026-09-29 14:15
26 Sept 2026, 07:09 UTC164 viewsread 27 September 2026 开课啦
26 Sept 2026, 04:48 UTC168 viewsread 27 September 2026 每月红包、抽奖、半价、白嫖各种福利
上海大群(广告混合群)
https://t.me/+TWOk2tNhl0xlMDY1
上海频道(选妃频道)
https://t.me/+1pnOFefrdSM1YjVl
评价频道(评价总频道)
https://t.me/+EbWEgRAWO000ZDc1
上海狼友小分队(红包白嫖各种福利)
https://t.me/+xQ2RwMOlgYs5MDE1
26 Sept 2026, 03:00 UTC156 viewsread 27 September 2026 👍👍👍【艺术展览会福利群】⬇️
免费拿5折6折7折优惠
和抽奖 白嫖 现金红包🧧福利
本群专属手势认证高质量老师
上海艺术展览会福利群: https://t.me/+nFnE0wANtSRkMjEx 点击进去备用群
上海艺术展览会总榜单:https://t.me/+2i_egsiBxNFlNmJh
上海艺术展览会人气推荐榜 https://t.me/+vOj1VuT48NE3MDc1
上海艺术展览会中转平台 https://t.me/+-sIwH2NalFw2MzEy
展览会老师广告群 @shanghaiyishu
个人推荐频道88🧧
📡 上榜管理:@yishuja_bot
📡 管理秘书:@Yishujia798_bot
Channel photo updated
26 Sept 2026, 02:59 UTC142 viewsread 27 September 2026 👍👍👍【艺术展览会福利群】⬇️
免费拿5折6折7折优惠
和抽奖 白嫖 现金红包🧧福利
本群专属手势认证高质量老师
上海艺术展览会福利群: https://t.me/+nFnE0wANtSRkMjEx 点击进去备用群
上海艺术展览会总榜单:https://t.me/+2i_egsiBxNFlNmJh
上海艺术展览会人气推荐榜 https://t.me/+vOj1VuT48NE3MDc1
上海艺术展览会中转平台 https://t.me/+-sIwH2NalFw2MzEy
展览会老师广告群 @shanghaiyishu
个人推荐频道88🧧
📡 上榜管理:@yishuja_bot
📡 管理秘书:@Yishujia798_bot
6 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC144 viewsread 27 September 2026 上海展览会报告模版:
https://t.me/+aLG8nrJVcQQ2MzRh
【体验评分】:9
【人照几成】:9.5
【验证留名】:漫哈
【验证时间】:7.9
【妹子艺名】:豌豆
【联系方式】:@wandouu9
【所在位置】:闵行
【上课水费】:12p19pp
【身材描述】:身材匀称个子高挑有胸腰臀比好
【凶器罩杯】:C
【老师类型】: 高挑颜值大熊嫩妹
【服务类型】:有🐍水中箫嫩妹里服务算很好的
【服务态度】:态度没毛病
【优点缺点】:优点很嫩,颜值高,愿意服务。没什么缺点
【过程补充描述】:进门看到老师颜值高且白果断p转pp,交上水费一起洗澡,全程不用你动手洗完后背水中箫爽的一批。待到床上更是大蟒蛇起手上半身都会舔到,然后吃鸡有深喉不喊停不停。做起来也是非常舒适,非常紧致水润反馈自然,后入的时候还可以看到老师下面的肉会被抽查带出来。实在是难得的好老师,非常推荐
6 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC141 viewsread 27 September 2026 上海艺术展览会报告模板:
https://t.me/+nFnE0wANtSRkMjEx
【体验评分】:9
【人照几成】:10
【验证留名】:卡面来打
【验证时间】:7.11
【妹子艺名】:#豌豆
【联系方式】:@wandouu9
【所在位置】:闵行
【上课水费】:工兵
【身材描述】:身材丰腴有致
【凶器罩杯】:C
【服务类型】: yyy、水中萧、舌吻、三点口
【服务态度】:10
【优点缺点】:优点:服务系嫩妹,颜值还高,态度一流,皮肤也好 缺点:暂未发现
【整体补充】:
形象:少见的人照无差,基本照片就是所见即所得,目测身高168左右,腿长,身材丰腴有致,肚子无赘肉大屁股手感一流,皮肤光滑且是难得的白皮无纹身,下面无毛人工白虎。
服务和态度:态度和服务吊打精妹,从进门开始主动递水递鞋,YYY洗澡全自动,刚冲干净就没有任何预兆的直接蹲下一套水中萧,结束帮擦背,漱口水都先给撕开再递过来;床上…
6 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC149 viewsread 27 September 2026 Forwarded from @yuputuanba
【体验评分】:9
【验证留名】:zoro
【妹子艺名】:豌豆
【联系方式】:@wandouu9
【上课水费】:19PP
【老师类型】: 大熊嫩妹
【整体补充】:
上个月第二次cj豌豆换了地方,在七宝附近,找了一会儿,课室干净
硬件方便嫩妹年纪,御姐长相,标准梨形身材,实战利器,御姐气质
软件方面,会给你拿鞋擦身体,整的我这个纯情少男挺不好意思的,浴室共浴,jb洗干净就蹲下来开始口,没有经验的人估计这个环节就漏了
来到床上开始缠绵,首先是舌吻,随后女上,有点顶不住随后提议换我主动。正面123结束战斗,保留子弹迎战第二发;本人性癖屁股,站着让妹子K硬后让ls后入姿势就位,对着屁股挑逗几下后随后进去,配合着优秀腰臀比,感觉下面越来越涨越来越热,完全进入状态,后入还是比cjs要爽啊,随后一泻千里,满意离开
【温馨提醒】:报告仅供参考,请理性选择,切勿对号入座
6 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC125 viewsread 27 September 2026 Photo
🎖精英车评🎖
💃艺名:豌豆
✈️资料:https://t.me/shxyls/24688
⛳️位置: #闵行区
🙍♂️学生:匹夫
————————————————
人照无差甚至本人更好看,长在了我的审美点上,身高167,皮肤摸着特别光滑,🐻也很挺摸着特别舒服,而且真的是18的嫩妹,身体条件还是很在线的,下面是人工白虎。老师真的很不错,值得推荐
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @wandou5206. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“豌豆的后花园” (@wandou5206), 83 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wandou5206.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.