Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

WallStreetPump Pancake/ PooCoin/ Binance

@wallstreetUniswap

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,062subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001257709297
TypeChannel
Username@wallstreetUniswap
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/wallstreetUniswap

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (4 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@wallstreetUniswap/2094 · this entry28 Jul 2022, 01:46 UTC@crypto_wallstreetbet/222928 Jul 2022, 01:46 UTC1.00under a minute
@wallstreetUniswap/2097 · this entry30 Jul 2022, 16:44 UTC@crypto_wallstreetbet/223230 Jul 2022, 16:44 UTC1.00under a minute
@wallstreetUniswap/2128 · this entry29 Jan 2023, 22:43 UTC@crypto_wallstreetbet/225929 Jan 2023, 22:43 UTC1.00under a minute
@wallstreetUniswap/2131 · this entry31 Jan 2023, 18:06 UTC@crypto_wallstreetbet/226231 Jan 2023, 18:06 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@crypto_wallstreetbet10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (100)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 11 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 July 2022 to 8 February 2023. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @wallstreetUniswap — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,0621,0651,063.56 August 2026 — 1,065 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,065 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,062 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,062–1,065 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 14:311,062-3
6 Aug 2026, 21:311,065no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:201,065first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 July 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

8 Feb 2023, 18:46 UTC≈1,430 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptocurrency_pumps_signalsPhoto

We can say it was a very successful pump again, we could reach all of our targets and pumped the coin more than 1000%. We had a really great volume in the pump as usual. GET READY FOR OUR NEXT PUMP ON Sunday! LOW: 0.0014 HIGH: 0.0157 https://t.me/cryptocurrency_pumps_signals

8 Feb 2023, 18:11 UTC≈1,380 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptocurrency_pumps_signalsPhoto

600% + https://t.me/cryptocurrency_pumps_signals

8 Feb 2023, 18:06 UTC946 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptocurrency_pumps_signals

📣The coin name is : KMHR 🌐Direct link to buy the coin at PancakeSwap ↓↓↓ https://pancakeswap.finance/swap?outputCurrency=0xE00202E73CdF446361B91F6E785907B67CB056BC 🟦After clicking on the link, you need to wait 10-20 seconds, then click "I understand" and purchase a coin. 🟥Address contract ↓ ↓ ↓ 0xE00202E73CdF446361B91F6E785907B67CB056BC 📊Link to the coin chart ↓↓ https://www.dexview.com/bsc/0xE00202E73CdF4463

8 Feb 2023, 17:56 UTC527 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptocurrency_pumps_signals

5 minutes left until our Pump on Pancakeswap🚀 ⏰ Time: 6 pm GMT ( 6 pm UK time) The next message will be the name of the coin 🚀 https://t.me/cryptocurrency_pumps_signals

6 Feb 2023, 23:28 UTC433 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptocurrency_pumps_signalsPhoto

🤑 Great pump! x20 profits! Pump result: GREAT pump again guys! and we have here double pump with a second wave with +490%! 📊 https://t.me/cryptocurrency_pumps_signals Low: 0.0019 🤔 High: 0.0390 🚀🚀🚀🚀 We can safely say that this pump was a very great success and that the upcoming one will be much bigger and we have many waves at the same time and our pump lasted for over 10 minutes and also stay up by +490%! We are

5 Feb 2023, 17:06 UTC322 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptocurrency_pumps_signals

⭐️⭐️ 60 MINUTES BEFORE THE MEGA PUMP ON HOTBIT! 🤑 ⭐️⭐️ https://t.me/cryptocurrency_pumps_signals

31 Jan 2023, 18:06 UTCviews —

WallStreetPump Pancake/ PooCoin/ Binance pinned «24 hours left until our Pump on Pancakeswap 📅 Date: 1 February ⏰ Time: 6 pm GMT ( 6 pm UK time) Don’t forget to turn on the notifications 🔔 https://t.me/cryptocurrency_pumps_signals»

31 Jan 2023, 18:06 UTC311 viewsread 6 August 2026

24 hours left until our Pump on Pancakeswap 📅 Date: 1 February ⏰ Time: 6 pm GMT ( 6 pm UK time) Don’t forget to turn on the notifications 🔔 https://t.me/cryptocurrency_pumps_signals

30 Jan 2023, 20:42 UTC281 viewsread 6 August 2026

⭐️ 4 DAYS BEFORE THE MEGA PUMP ON HOTBIT! 🤑 ⭐️⭐️ https://t.me/cryptocurrency_pumps_signals

30 Jan 2023, 16:05 UTC240 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptocurrency_pumps_signals

💥NEW HOTBIT PUMP ANNOUNCEMENT 💥 ⏳Date : 4 February ⏰Time : 6 pm GMT 🏰Exchange : HOTBIT 🐳 +28 Whale Channels 🎯 Target: +600% PROFIT !!! So what are you waiting for? 🤔 https://t.me/cryptocurrency_pumps_signals

29 Jan 2023, 22:43 UTC252 viewsread 6 August 2026

The next pump will be on Wednesday. 💎 Platform: Pancakeswap 📅 Date: 1 February ⏰ Time: 6 pm GMT ( 6 pm UK time) 💵 The coin will be against BNB Our last pump was great and our members made over 1000% profit. We believe that Wednesday’s pump will bring in more profit. https://t.me/cryptocurrency_pumps_signals

28 Jan 2023, 19:52 UTC230 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptocurrency_pumps_signals

The next pump will be on Sunday. 💎 Platform: Pancakeswap 📅 Date: 29 January ⏰ Time: 6 pm GMT ( 6 pm UK time) 💵 The coin will be against BNB Our last pump was great and our members made over 1000% profit. We believe that Sunday’s pump will bring in more profit. https://t.me/cryptocurrency_pumps_signals

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wallstreetUniswap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 780,463 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“WallStreetPump Pancake/ PooCoin/ Binance” (@wallstreetUniswap), 1,062 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wallstreetUniswap.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.