Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ускоритель частиц

Channel

ускоритель частиц

@vsevolna

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

248subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001815762374
TypeChannel
Username@vsevolna
Descriptionтрансцедентальная_Импровизация
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/vsevolna

Growth

2486 Aug 2026, 13:20 — 248 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:30 — 248 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 13:207 Aug 2026, 02:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 247–249 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:30248no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:20248first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
73
Videos
34
Links
29

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

145 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52197877131960804262819.3%
custom 53525427299538815331812.4%
custom 53346667883051208731711.7%
custom 62873104546162313801510.3%
custom 5064545665015614597138.97%
custom 5271635239838433603128.28%
custom 532598243744707948785.52%
custom 532823881569587586085.52%
custom 535291343717113367674.83%
custom 544979257922056122164.14%
custom 527181631565963175753.45%
custom 629650528810723300942.76%
custom 527192729761456244021.38%
custom 534153853841024991421.38%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC269 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

фабула оператор: @ImarisDeer ещё видосы на камеру: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gPOoFLBHub8&list=PLRDfcl-gvz50&index=19&t=719s&pp=2AHPBZACAYgEAfAFAQ%3D%3D&ra=m

custom 53346667883051208737custom 52716352398384336034custom 62873104546162313803custom 50645456650156145971custom 53415385384102499141

7 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC250 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 62965052881072330093

7 Jun 2026, 21:55 UTC541 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

no hashish, no change money, no saki saki

custom 535254272995388153310

6 Jun 2026, 15:40 UTC767 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

братцы, у кого-нибудь из вас в пределах мозгвы есть мотоцикл, или знаете человека у которого есть мотоцикл? нужно для тотально радикального клипа Ускорителя Частиц вознаграждение опционально, подробности в лс @purplegongs

custom 53346667883051208737

27 May 2026, 09:14 UTC554 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 62873104546162313805

28 Apr 2026, 11:22 UTC591 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://om-inc.bandcamp.com/album/abstraktes-bild также на нашем бэндкемпе есть обскурный кассетный релиз посвященный художнику Герхарду Рихтеру, записанный Колей и Филиппом вдвоем вживую на немецкий магнитофон грюндиг 70ых годов

custom 53529134371711336767custom 53525427299538815333custom 52716352398384336031custom 52719272976145624401

28 Apr 2026, 11:20 UTC632 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://om-inc.bandcamp.com/album/--2 альбом теперь есть на нашем bandcamp, так что его могут послушать те кто не пользуется стримингами и прочей хуйней

custom 50645456650156145974custom 53346667883051208733custom 62873104546162313802

25 Apr 2026, 17:34 UTC498 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

никита чернат это русский зак хилл

custom 62873104546162313805custom 52716352398384336033custom 52719272976145624401

21 Apr 2026, 10:26 UTC575 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 50645456650156145978custom 54497925792205612214custom 52716352398384336031custom 53415385384102499141

16 Apr 2026, 02:54 UTC638 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🤩🤩 🤩 🤩 🤩

custom 52716352398384336033custom 53525427299538815332custom 54497925792205612212

16 Apr 2026, 00:52 UTC602 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

вы хотити интервью? вы хотите чтоб интервьюир не проебался на рыбалке и не увяз в снегу??? вы хотите обои? о б о и о б о и 0 6 о и и и и и и и и и и и и и и и и м и и и и и и и и и и и и и и. и и ии иииммм ми. с с с с с с ь. см с с. с м. ит. им с с. ь т и. мити78:8288282929292929292929929/9:&&:&/&&/&/&&&/&:&/&:&:&:&&:&&&&&&&&&&@«»»»»»••»»»••»-«-«»-«-«-«»-«-«- и ? >

custom 52197877131960804266custom 53525427299538815333custom 62965052881072330091

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vsevolna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 73,440 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ускоритель частиц” (@vsevolna), 248 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vsevolna.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.