Тернии: персеиды 🤩 Чтобы увидеть живописные персеиды своими глазами, нужно пройти через Тернии. Мы объявляем созвездие лайн-апа на два дня ☦️ 15 августа ⭐️ дом прекрасных аустов фрезер ц 8 Hz ускоритель частиц novocainerascal R.dy вставка onibabа отречение петра gonaitei оперение желтого деревянный старик митрей 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 16 августа ⭐️ секретный гость, ты действительно нечто 𓆣 муравьеворот тумба-юмба парник игор…

Channel
эстетика телеграмности
@pasos_aesthetics
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
105subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001489823241 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pasos_aesthetics |
| Description | черновики. жизнь и мемы: https://t.me/pasosdiary |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pasos_aesthetics |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 105 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 105 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 20 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 30.5%
- avg views ÷ 105 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 32.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (20 September 2024 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 32 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 50
- Videos
- 9
- Links
- 14
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 8m 14s
- Average length
- 1m 11s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
63 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 40 | 63.5% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 25.4% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2024 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
слушать на площадках на фите
вот ссылка на ВК, если у кого не открывается ютьюб.
Серые кардиналы завтрашнего вечера — группа «Мыс Просония». Полгода назад мы отыграли гиг на первой «Слюде» — и сегодня выкладываем этот легендарный лайв на ютьюб. На том концерте публика так обалдела от нашей музыки, что голые мальчики летали под потолком. Вместо тысячи слов лучше посмотрите несколько песен оттуда и проникнитесь этой музыкой так же, как они. И приходите завтра на «Склад» услышать её живьём.
🔥1
извините можно прославить? волос в горле кладезь, христианский праздник, ветшалый наличник, личное: вы хотите ходить и гладить пряди? хочу. хочу быть портретом в тетради, а не ожогом на нежном запястье, греть ледяные носы об щёк батареи, во взаимоласке реять, собирать перья комочками с гребня; верить. а вы звезда путеводная, малАя медведица — глядите сапфирами глаз и сапфиров гладите, когда небо гаснет.
🤔6🔥3👍1
Video, posted without a caption
🔥3👍2🤔1
ГЛЯДИТЕ! МЕНЯ! ВНУТРЬ! газетно-поэтический полиптих
🔥1
PAIN FULL SUN - Настоящая искренность Нажми сюда Особая благодарность людям которые появлялись на альбоме: @omaens.ca @oooorrrreeeennnn - 🥁 @amelius.s - 🎺 🎹 🎸 @zombie_larina - (Viola) @ya_poshel_umirat - 🎸 @shlimazelu - 🥁 Tal a. Avraham - 📷 P.s. Всё тот же. Ваш тёплый, ламповый ;)
Video, posted without a caption
🔥1
полтора года назад мы заперлись в деревянном домике на окраине Тарусы, обили его одеялами и записали наш первый мини-альбом — это ипишка о четырёх песнях. честно говоря, здесь нет никакой концепции — мы просто хотели записать всё, что успели сочинить, но получилось несколько меньше, и альбом вышел немного кабацким. как и полагается хорошему альбому, наша запись, конечно, расширяет сознание. не ипишка, а настоящая эп…
🔥3
летом я орагнизовал СНТ (садовое некоммерческое товарищество) – потайной нано-лейбл. первыми релизами были камбоджа + снюс и записанная в детском лагере стук колёс. в октябре были выпущены записи товарищей, о которых сейчас расскажу 🚘 сын курьера – в детстве я мечтал стать дальнобойщиком слушайте этот альбом, чтобы тихий огонёк вашей души никогда не погас 🌟 umiico – lost in shadows диджитальный днб / брейккор от да…
👍1🔥1
Маршрут - Мелкие победы — Большие поражения 10.11
🔥9👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @pasos_aesthetics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 845,988 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Mapwpyt · 382 postsТЕРНИИ
@TERNII_3 · 6202 postsДом Престарелых Аутистов и Прекрасных Аустов
@awesomeacoustics · 1,7701 postфрезер ц
@freserc · 4481 post$ kasitsky archive $
@kasitsky · 1,0461 postKimas unofficial
@kimbogoslovsky · 2951 postOmæns
@Omaens · 131 postОтречение Петра
@otrechenie_petra · 911 postПарник здесь
@parnik_band · 381 postПороки на пороге [Onibaba]
@porokvsrok · 2021 postдеревянный старик митрей
@shmeetrey · 3321 postоперение жёлтого
@shumdelaetbrr · 1361 postМуравьеворот
@TheAntMill · 4551 postускоритель частиц
@vsevolna · 2481 postвставка
@vstvk · 661 postсын курьера и все все все
@zdesraspishites · 811 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@pasos_aesthetics named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“эстетика телеграмности” (@pasos_aesthetics), 105 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pasos_aesthetics.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.