Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Vox Futuri | Голос Будущего

@vox_futuri

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

364subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002168395067
TypeChannel
Username@vox_futuri
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vox_futuri

Growth

3623643636 August 2026 — 363 subscribers6 August 2026 — 362 subscribers6 August 2026 — 362 subscribers12 August 2026 — 364 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 362–364 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:13364+2
6 Aug 2026, 21:02362no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:00362-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:55363first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 2 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
340.7%
avg views ÷ 364 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,240
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held19 (2 July 202516 July 2026)
Views total1,240
Reactions total37
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

610 reactions across 19 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23338.2%
👍10717.5%
custom 52174352608238259549114.9%
🔥7712.6%
❤‍🔥264.26%
🤝121.97%
👎111.80%
🍾71.15%
🎉60.984%
💘50.82%
💩50.82%
😁50.82%
🤔50.82%
🥰40.656%
custom 522667164812341747330.492%
💯30.492%
🤣30.492%
🥴30.492%
🥱20.328%
👌10.164%
1 further kind10.164%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 610reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2025 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vox_futuri. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2025 to 16 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC≈1,240 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🎇 Тоффлер: пророк информационного будущего 🌕 Термин «постиндустриальное общество» интуитивно ассоциируется с эволюционным развитием человеческой цивилизации, причем экономические отношения занимают главенствующее место в этой парадигме. Если в стране меньше заводов и больше офисов (как в странах Запада, Японии и США), кажется, что она уже шагнула в будущее. Никаких конфликтов, всë, конец истории. Конечно, при обраще

16👍7custom 52174352608238259546😁4🔥2❤‍🔥1👎1

4 Jul 2026, 11:58 UTC368 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ruscoop

Трансляция CoopsDay’26

🔥41

4 Jul 2026, 11:58 UTC313 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ruscoopPhoto

Поздравляем с Международным Днем Кооперативов! #COOPSDAY'26 👍 04.07.2026 | 12:00-19:00 Москва, ВДНХ Флагманский НКО Центр (пав. 44 Кролиководства) ☑ Регистрация

7🔥2👎1custom 52174352608238259541

26 Apr 2026, 18:41 UTC759 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🧠 Ровно год назад было основано сообщество Голос Будущего! В рамках идеологического поля мы занимаем позицию сторонников постиндустриальных изменений, основанных на идеях либертарного социализма. Мы считаем, что теория социализма не может ограничиться именами К. Маркса и Ф. Энгельса, ведь аналогичный по качеству вклад в нее внесли такие теоретики, как П.-Ж. Прудон, М.А. Бакунин, П.А., Кропоткин, В.М. Чернов и многи

15🔥7custom 52174352608238259547❤‍🔥2🎉2🤝2🤔1🥴1

21 Mar 2026, 11:08 UTC≈4,440 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤝 Кооперация между идеей и практикой: мировой опыт и российские инициативы🌕 В прошлой статье, посвященной проблеме кооперации, мы рассмотрели путь развития российских кооперативов: результаты на данный момент не вдохновляют. Однако на мировой арене достижения кооперативного движения более заметны. В первую очередь это касается деятельности Международного кооперативного альянса. 🧠 Продолжение на сайте... Автор: Кир

18🤝5custom 52174352608238259544❤‍🔥2👎1

26 Feb 2026, 09:14 UTC≈1,080 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔴 Программа «Непокоренной Франции» на Парижских выборах: Социал-популизм и зерна постиндустриального социализма🌕 Некоторое время назад меня попросили прокомментировать программу кандидата в мэры Парижа от «Непокоренной Франции» С. Шикиру. Я постарался выделить в социал-популизме, обычном для современных влиятельных западных левых, зерна постиндустриального видения преобразований, и кое-что нашел. Программа ставит во

22👍10🔥5custom 52174352608238259543👎1🤔1

22 Jan 2026, 12:37 UTC≈1,460 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌑 Реальность и перспективы периферийной модернизации: опыт Таиланда 🇹🇭 10 дней этим летом я провел в замечательной туристической стране – Таиланде. Большинство отдыхающих едет сюда за теплыми водами Сиамского залива, белоснежными пляжами о-ва Пхукет, свежими морепродуктами и ночными развлечениями, и всё это за довольно доступную цену. Но есть и те, кто едет сюда не только за яркими впечатлениями от насыщенного том я

custom 521743526082382595411👍74👎1💘1

20 Jan 2026, 10:03 UTC≈1,800 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

❓«Вопрос? – Ответ» 🌕 В условиях, когда дискуссия о моделях будущего общества и о его конкретных принципах практически отсутствует, крайне важно уже сегодня начать формировать и продвигать эту повестку. В то же время нельзя претендовать на окончательность теоретических предложений. Причина проста – заранее невозможно предугадать, по какому сценарию пойдут события в момент, когда появится возможность свободно и открыт

❤‍🔥129custom 52174352608238259544🔥3

31 Dec 2025, 14:18 UTC747 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🧠 Уважаемые подписчики! Поздравляем Вас с наступающим Новым годом! Для нас прошедший год стал знаменательным событием: в апреле мы смогли основать наше сообщество и порадовать читателей 15 статьями. Наиболее популярными материалами стали: 1) «Наследие народника Н.К. Михайловского и проблемы XXI века» 2) «Выборы и абсентеизм» 3) «Реквием по индустриальному обществу?» От всего коллектива желаем Вам сохранять оптимизм

custom 52174352608238259542310🍾7🎉4

29 Nov 2025, 12:12 UTC≈6,920 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🚩 Социальный эксперимент в Рожаве: мнения и споры 🌕 Вот уже десятилетие Рожава, автономное курдское образование на Севере Сирии, является символом необычного образа жизни и сражающегося очага то ли коммунизма, то ли анархизма. Раздаются и критические голоса: «Товарищи, Вас обманывают, не путайте рекламу и жизнь». Уникальность Рожавы проявляется в двух отношениях. Во-первых, курды позиционируют себя и свою революцию

👍188🔥4custom 52174352608238259542❤‍🔥1

18 Nov 2025, 11:04 UTC≈5,290 views35 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

🏭 Реквием по индустриальному обществу? 🌕 Недавно в телеграм-канале «Рабкор» вышел текст, в котором один из членов редакции затронул тему угасания индустриального общества. На нашем сайте ранее выходил материал Кирилла Селеткова, в котором была разобрана часть противоречивых утверждений, сделанных в посте. Однако текст автора «Рабкора» настолько симптоматичен, что остались затронутые им темы, которые хотелось бы обсу

14custom 521743526082382595410👍8❤‍🔥3

13 Nov 2025, 08:04 UTC≈5,190 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌆 Преодоление индустриализма и заблуждения индустриалистов 🌕 Взгляды сторонников постиндустриального социализма, как наиболее современного подхода к преодолению капитализма, подвергаются атакам со стороны приверженцев более традиционных концепций, возникших в далеком прошлом, но стремящихся адаптироваться к миру, серьезно изменившемуся за полтора столетия. Такая критика была бы очень полезна, если бы не основывалась

10👍7🔥4🤣2custom 52174352608238259542💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vox_futuri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 205,392 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vox Futuri | Голос Будущего” (@vox_futuri), 364 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vox_futuri.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.