Уважаемые подписчики и подписчицы Смотрите, что вышло Пишите комментарии, ставьте сердечки, делитесь с кем угодно:)
🎉14❤9🥰4👻1🤯1

Channel
@logographhistoria
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
831subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001715841217 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @logographhistoria |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/logographhistoria |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 831 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 835 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 835 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 834 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (12 June 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,090 |
| Reactions total | 136 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
313 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 168 | 53.7% | |
| 👍 | 32 | 10.2% | |
| 🤯 | 26 | 8.31% | |
| ❤🔥 | 24 | 7.67% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 7.67% | |
| 🎉 | 14 | 4.47% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 2.88% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 2.24% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 1.92% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.639% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 0.319% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 313reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Уважаемые подписчики и подписчицы Смотрите, что вышло Пишите комментарии, ставьте сердечки, делитесь с кем угодно:)
🎉14❤9🥰4👻1🤯1
Были вопросы по поводу роликов на канале, когда будет вообще что-то ещё. Уважаемые, все будет, я планирую снять этим летом видосик. Но интересная особенность есть у меня, я могу, не работая на дядю, найти себе занятие и устать от этого, ахах. Удивительно. Без учебы своя загруженность присутствует, но да ладно, не прям тяжко. Хотелось бы снимать почаще, но увы, не получается(
👍8❤4🤯2🔥1
На самом деле, Мишель видел куда катится капиталистическая система, он хотел спасти дисциплинированные массы и предвещал важными знаками людей за год до события Он понимал, что визуальный эффект будет сильным, особенно на лекциях, поэтому за год до мая 1968го делал характерные движения руками, т.к. рука это и жёсткая хватка и рука руку моет, к слову. #мем@logographhistoria Всерьёз не воспринимайте, я делал прикол
🥰5❤2🤣2
А вы не замечали? Обычно, существуют разные теории, версии происхождения цивилизаций, государствогенеза и т.д. Вспомнить можно всякие, но в первую очередь прилетает обычно тем, которые идеологически ангажированные - ну яркий пример это марксистская теория. Внутри марксизма, как известно, куча течений, которые порой расходятся диаметрально, но всё-таки, тема отхода от первобытного коммунизма в сторону классового рас…
❤10🤯2❤🔥1🔥1
Заметил, на нескольких дружественных каналах упомянули 90-летие гражданской войны в Испании, ну а футбол меня мало интересует Безусловно, данное событие было крупномасштабным не только в силу ресурсов, жертв, но и в плане подъема политических экспериментов. Удивляют такие моменты, когда большая часть политического кажется одномерным, но потом в истории происходят моменты по типу Парижской коммуны и т.д., когда люди …
❤16🔥6🤯3👍1
Знание незнания Речь не о пресловутом сциентизме или типа того, нене. Без ерунды, хех. Люди могут опешить, задуматься о жизни и расставить приоритеты. Для Л.Н. Толстого феномен того, как простой человек просто живёт и не думает о конце своей жизни - уже факт наличия бога внутри нас, факт присутствия внутренней энергии, чего не понять высшим классам и т.д. С другой стороны, возможно, современный Л.Н. Толстой смотрел…
❤🔥7❤5🤯2
Термин "волна" сам по себе сложен, с одной стороны, он может показать, что человек идёт по течению, т.к. течение его определяет, у него нет возможности выбора. Вместе с этим тут тема массовости, когда потом людей сам по себе подобен волне, когда частичка каждого микрокосма, маленького мирка сливается в одно и идёт в определенную сторону, как в физике при толчке, но это веет чем-то неодушевленным. С другой стороны вол…
❤🔥8❤6🤯3
🎇 Тоффлер: пророк информационного будущего 🌕 Термин «постиндустриальное общество» интуитивно ассоциируется с эволюционным развитием человеческой цивилизации, причем экономические отношения занимают главенствующее место в этой парадигме. Если в стране меньше заводов и больше офисов (как в странах Запада, Японии и США), кажется, что она уже шагнула в будущее. Никаких конфликтов, всë, конец истории. Конечно, при обраще…
❤🔥6❤4🤝1🤯1
Оптика Цицерона В античности мыслители пытались рефлексировать на тему религии, ее соотношения с возвышенным и народным. В Риме времён Цицерона ее стали осмыслять с точки зрения собственной практики центрообразования, на наш лад можно сказать монополии. Не знаю как другие, можно даже устроить дискуссии в комментариях, но я противопоставляю Древнюю Грецию и Рим с точки зрения идей в политической сфере, гражданской и…
❤8❤🔥2🤯2
Подписчики и подписчицы, канал возобновляет работу, т.к. я приехал домой Это был весьма интересный опыт, по крайней мере не каждый день сталкиваешься со средневековым скелетом (их было два). Средневековье у нас - эпоха монголов и Чингисхана, не путать с чуваками, которые носили большие кресты на одеждах по дороге в Иерусалим Бренность бытия, скоротечность жизни, все это раскалывается по слоям вместе с находкой, по …
❤36🔥10😱6🤯1
Уважаемые подписчики и подписчицы, друзья, подруги и просто хорошие люди:) Скорее всего недельку не смогу заходить в сеть (а может смогу), т.к. буду на раскопках, поэтому не теряйте, не стройте конпирологических теорий, все хорошо 👍🏻 В прошлом году пропал на две недели, даже не предупредив, сегодня исправляюсь ;)
👍23❤11🤝6🤯1
Бакунин....
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @logographhistoria. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Бакунин....
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 749,364 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ярослав Парамонов” (@logographhistoria), 831 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/logographhistoria.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.