Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Voter Apathy Party {P R E S T I G E D}

Channel

Voter Apathy Party {P R E S T I G E D}

@voterapathyparty2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

440subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 30 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004326056425
TypeChannel
Username@voterapathyparty2
DescriptionNews, Memes, and Harmful Misinformation. Banned on Facebook. Twitter: @vaxxedlibtard Currently broadcasting from Toccoa, GA
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded30 September 2026
Last confirmed live30 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/voterapathyparty2

Growth

44030 Sept 2026, 21:47 — 440 subscribers30 Sept 2026, 22:22 — 440 subscribers30 Sept 2026, 21:4730 Sept 2026, 22:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 439–441 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Sept 2026, 22:22440no change
30 Sept 2026, 21:47440first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.3%
avg views ÷ 440 subscribers
Avg views / post
186
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held20 (30 September 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total3,720
Reactions total47
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 22:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
701
Videos
205
Links
55

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6m 38s
Average length
1m 06s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

47 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2246.8%
🐳714.9%
😨510.6%
🌚48.51%
👏36.38%
👍24.26%
🤣24.26%
💯12.13%
🥰12.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 September 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2026, 20:38 UTC58 viewsread 30 September 2026
Forwarded from @GodLikesElephantsVideo

The best scene from Primetime (2026)

30 Sept 2026, 20:04 UTC70 views1 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Forwarded from @theprkchpexprsPhoto

Don’t talk to me until I’ve had my once per decade Central African genocide

🥰1

30 Sept 2026, 19:29 UTC92 viewsread 30 September 2026
Forwarded from @vvmemegalleryPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

30 Sept 2026, 19:27 UTC84 viewsread 30 September 2026
Forwarded from @the_wage_cageVideo

Video, posted without a caption

30 Sept 2026, 19:14 UTC110 viewsread 30 September 2026
Forwarded from @mastigpostingPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

30 Sept 2026, 17:16 UTC121 views3 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Forwarded from @InstituteforMaleSupremacyVideo

Source ✤ Via @whitesocksclips Nick Fuentes reacts to the Cornell frat "r*pе" case and says that everyone involved should be jailed "The girl should be imprisoned for being a slut... and the men should go to prison for also being wh*res, for also being degenerates. It's too much. It's too far."

👏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @voterapathyparty2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Voter Apathy Party {P R E S T I G E D}” (@voterapathyparty2), 440 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voterapathyparty2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.