14 measurements spanning 12 days, net -40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,433–16,493 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 20:37
16,440
-4
16 Aug 2026, 16:48
16,444
-7
15 Aug 2026, 01:43
16,451
+5
13 Aug 2026, 15:27
16,446
-9
12 Aug 2026, 14:58
16,455
-10
11 Aug 2026, 15:17
16,465
-13
10 Aug 2026, 18:21
16,478
-3
9 Aug 2026, 19:01
16,481
-2
8 Aug 2026, 21:57
16,483
-3
8 Aug 2026, 00:57
16,486
+6
6 Aug 2026, 23:46
16,480
-2
6 Aug 2026, 03:00
16,482
+2
6 Aug 2026, 02:45
16,480
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:39
16,480
first reading
Engagement
173 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.29%
avg views ÷ 16,440 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,530
173 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
173
of 173 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
173 (4 August 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
264,154
Reactions total
9,530
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
25m 11s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,709 reactions across 161 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,419
16.3%
❤
1,047
12.0%
🔥
779
8.94%
💩
741
8.51%
🤬
700
8.04%
😁
687
7.89%
👏
625
7.18%
🤡
378
4.34%
👎
330
3.79%
😢
281
3.23%
🤣
264
3.03%
🤮
213
2.45%
🖕
204
2.34%
😱
200
2.30%
🥰
191
2.19%
💯
120
1.38%
🤔
89
1.02%
💊
75
0.861%
🙏
70
0.804%
🍾
61
0.7%
23 further kinds
235
2.70%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 173 of the 173 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,530reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 173 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇷🇴🇺🇦🇷🇺
Румунска војска забележила најмасовније руске ударе на луке на Дунаву
➖ „Напади на украјинске луке на Дунаву достигли су врхунац. На радарима Министарства одбране, у близини ваздушног простора Румуније, али и даље изнад територије Украјине, забележили смо више од 100 беспилотних летелица које су током последњих неколико дана у седам наврата нападале украјинске луке на Дунаву“, изјавио је министар одбране Раду…
🇪🇺🇷🇺 Европска унија припрема свој највећи пакет санкција против Русије од 2022. године, изјавила је шефица дипломатије ЕУ Каја Калас у интервјуу за Ди Велт.
„За јесен припремам најобухватнији пакет санкција од почетка рата. Када буду усвојене, оне ће одмах повећати укупан број санкционисаних руских појединаца, компанија и организација за трећину. Притисак мора да се настави повећавати све док Москва не оконча рат“, …
🇷🇺🇺🇦 Руска војска је ослободила Новосолошино у Запорошкој области.
Јуришне јединице групе снага „Восток“ истерале су непријатеља из насеља и настављају напредовање у правцу Запорожја.
🇷🇺🇵🇱🇺🇦
Русија ствара мрежу база за далекометне дронове који би могли да угрозе Пољску — The Telegraph
▫️Русија је распоредила најмање 10 нових база са лансирним позицијама. Неке од њих се већ користе за нападе на Украјину, тврди лист.
▫️The Telegraph је идентификовао најмање 59 нових шинских лансера. Део ових центара уређен је на преуређеним војним објектима и цивилним аеродромима, док су остале локације постављене…
🇺🇸🇰🇵🇰🇷
Трамп: САД ће смањити војне вежбе са Јужном Корејом
Амерички председник Доналд Трамп наложио је Пентагону да значајно смањи обим заједничких војних вежби са Јужном Корејом, позивајући се на своје „веома добре односе“ са севернокорејским лидером Ким Џонг Уном.
„Ове вежбе нису само скупе, при чему велики део трошкова плаћају Сједињене Америчке Државе (као и обично!), већ шаљу сигнал који је потпуно непримерен …
🇮🇱🇵🇸 Објављена је нова фотографија која показује у каквом се стању налази палестински новинар Мохамед Араб након две године проведене у израелском притвору.
Ухапшен је док је извештавао из болнице Ал Шифа у Гази.
ВОСТОК | Facebook | Instagram | X
🇷🇺🇬🇧 Британски дронови први пут извели ударе дубоко унутар Русије – Сандеј тајмс
Украјина је први пут употребила дронове произведене у Великој Британији за нападе на циљеве унутар Русије. Мете су биле рафинерије нафте у Волгограду и Јарослављу.
Сандеј тајмс ово назива „новом етапом војног партнерства“ Лондона и Кијева.
Високи извор у британском Министарству одбране изјавио је да је циљ ових напада да покажу Москви…
🇺🇦🇪🇺 Корупција у окружењу Зеленског постаје проблем за Европу – Берлинер цајтунг
Корупција у окружењу Владимира Зеленског постаје проблем за Европу, јер руководство ЕУ сумња да је Кијев у садашњим условима способан да спроведе реформе неопходне за европске интеграције, пише Берлинер цајтунг.
Лист наводи да Кијев није способан да спроведе свеобухватну борбу против корупције, указујући на пуштање уз јемство бившег ше…
🇷🇺🇺🇦 Русија данас пријавила ударе на три теретна брода и два танкера у луци Одеса
Русија је данас пријавила да су у луци Одеса погођена три теретна брода и два танкера, као и резервоари за складиштење горива и складишта.
Такође је пријављен удар на теретни брод у Црном мору, источно од Одесе.
У Белгород-Дњестровском, према тим наводима, погођени су производна радионица и складиште у којем су се налазиле компоненте…
🏳️
Војна парада уз учешће представника Министарства одбране, Министарства унутрашњих послова и Генералне управе обавештајне службе Исламског Емирата Авганистана
Парада се одржава поводом годишњице талибанског преузимања Кабула 2021. године.
ВОСТОК | Facebook | Instagram | X
😱15🤔5💩4👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 173 posts we hold for @vostokvesti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@vostokvesti edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 136,840 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ВОСТОК ВЕСТИ” (@vostokvesti), 16,440 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vostokvesti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
