Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ВООПИК | Наследие Урала

@voopik66

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

364subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002114377417
TypeChannel
Username@voopik66
DescriptionСвердловское региональное отделение ВООПИК — Всероссийского общества охраны памятников истории и культуры 📩 E-mail: voopikekb@mail.ru 🌐 Сайт: voopiik66.ru ✊🏼 Поддержать нашу работу: voopiik66.ru/donate
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/voopik66

Growth

3646 Aug 2026, 08:18 — 364 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 21:02 — 364 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 08:186 Aug 2026, 21:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 363–365 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 21:02364no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:18364first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.8%
avg views ÷ 364 subscribers
Avg views / post
189
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held7 (21 July 202630 July 2026)
Views total1,320
Reactions total124
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
695
Videos
13
Links
142

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

124 reactions across 7 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4536.3%
🔥1713.7%
👍129.68%
😭129.68%
👏108.06%
❤‍🔥75.65%
😢43.23%
😱43.23%
💯32.42%
🙏32.42%
🤷‍♂32.42%
10.806%
😎10.806%
😨10.806%
🤩10.806%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 03:06 UTC151 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Суд по «Зданию общежития комплекса Дома обороны»: заседание СЕГОДНЯ! Сегодня, 30 июля, в 15:00 в Свердловском областном суде состоится заседание по делу о здании общежития комплекса Дома обороны. На прошлом заседании 29 июля были рассмотрены ответы эксперта Вероники Николаевой на вопросы истцов и подано ходатайство о назначении судебной экспертизы. Один из вопросов сегодняшнего заседания — рассмотрение ходатайс

❤‍🔥7👍3🔥3🤷‍♂1

28 Jul 2026, 10:36 UTC212 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Екатеринбург теряет своё лицо: с фасадов старинных зданий исчезают предметы охраны Свердловское региональное отделение ВООПИК зафиксировало случаи повреждения предметов охраны на нескольких объектах культурного наследия Екатеринбурга. Все разрушения происходят в рамках проведения так называемых «ремонтно-реставрационных работ». Серьёзные повреждения выявлены на фасадах зданий в центре города. На «Аптеке» (ул. Пушки

😭126💯3😎1😨1

27 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC229 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Спасти наследие, пока не поздно! Свердловское региональное отделение ВООПИК направило официальное обращение Президенту России с просьбой не подписывать законопроект № 827867-8. К сожалению, сегодня стало известно, что документ был подписан. Принятие этого документа создает прямую угрозу утраты значительной части культурного наследия нашей страны. 24-25 июля руководители Московского, Новосибирского, Рязанского о

10🔥5😢4

26 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC127 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Суд по «Зданию общежития комплекса Дома обороны»: заседание 29 июля 29 июля в 12:00 в Свердловском областном суде пройдёт судебное заседание по делу о здании общежития комплекса Дома обороны. На прошлом заседании рассмотрение дела было приостановлено в связи с отсутствием представителя ООО «Росив» и эксперта Вероники Николаевой. Напомним, что в процессе принимают участие представители прокуратуры Свердловской облас

12👍2🙏2🤩1

25 Jul 2026, 13:37 UTC287 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Ветхое» — значит под снос? Как соцгород Уралмаш лишают исторической памяти Ценность зданий в Екатеринбурге часто определяют исключительно по их физическому состоянию. Причём вердикт «не представляет ценности» нередко выносят те самые структуры, которые и довели объект до запустения. Именно так обстоит дело с бывшей детской больницей на ул. Орджоникидзе, д. 13. Построенное в 1930-е годы здание за почти вековую исто

7👍3🔥3🤷‍♂1🙏1

24 Jul 2026, 16:09 UTC107 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @hranitelinaslediaPhoto

Градозащитные пикеты на Старой площади 💢 Москва, 24 июля. Градозащитники из нескольких городов и регионов России проводят одиночное пикетирование в нескольких точках поблизости от административных зданий на Старой площади. 🙅‍♂️ Они призывают Президента РФ не подписывать принятый Государственной думой и одобренный Советом Федерации законопроект № 827867-8, который предоставляет властям субъектов РФ право исключать объ

🔥64👍3

21 Jul 2026, 15:09 UTC207 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

❗️ Конвейер экспертиз: что хотят сделать с территорией гостиницы «Большой Урал»? На сайте Управления государственной охраны объектов культурного наследия Свердловской области безостановочно публикуются акты государственных историко-культурных экспертиз (ГИКЭ) для общественного обсуждения. Поток настолько интенсивный, что за одну неделю может выходить 10 и более документов. К сожалению, большинство из них направлены

👏106😱41👍1🤷‍♂1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @voopik66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 306,256 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ВООПИК | Наследие Урала” (@voopik66), 364 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/voopik66.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.