Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for диалоги-диалоги

Channel

диалоги-диалоги

@dialogidialogi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

356subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002336418126
TypeChannel
Username@dialogidialogi
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dialogidialogi

Growth

351356353.57 August 2026 — 351 subscribers7 August 2026 — 351 subscribers15 August 2026 — 356 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 350–357 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 08:36356+5
7 Aug 2026, 21:17351no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:02351first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
54.6%
avg views ÷ 356 subscribers
Avg views / post
194
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held9 (13 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total777
Reactions total43
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

117 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6555.6%
💘2218.8%
💔1714.5%
👍43.42%
🔥43.42%
🕊21.71%
🦄21.71%
🥰10.855%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC240 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

➖Екатеринбург спектральный. Музыкальный семинар в формате прогулки вокруг Уралмаша и станции метро «Уральская» Человек изобрел компьютер и начал подробно изучать звук. Впервые человеческому уху стали доступны прежде неслышимые микропроцессы: «внутреннее убранство» отдельно взятого звука предстало как необъятный акустический простор. С развитием компьютерных методов анализа звука возникло новое музыкальное направлени

10💘5

28 Jul 2026, 16:22 UTC153 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ekatharsisPhoto

Екатеринбург, а вы слышите, как звучит наш город? 🐦 1. Чириканье, щебет, гомон птиц. 2. Взрослые разговоры, детские голоса. 3. Жужжание шмеля. 4. Лай собаки. 5. Взмахи крыльев воробья. 6. Удары мусорных баков. 7. Шуршание мусорных пакетов. 8. Гул машин и мотоциклов вдалеке Это то, что я услышала и записала за 3 минуты в парке Ново-Тихвинского монастыря на звуковой прогулке клуба Екатарсис с проектом диалоги-диалоги

10💘3

28 Jul 2026, 16:22 UTC153 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Итогами июльской прогулки делится создательница канала Екатарсис Анна Филосян — а мы с удовольствием репостим ее отзыв⤵️

👍4

20 Jul 2026, 14:06 UTC231 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Звуковая прогулка по центру города 🌟 Напоминаем вам, что «Екатарсис» позвал нас провести звуковую прогулку вокруг метро «Геологическая», парка «Зеленая роща» и Ново-Тихвинского монастыря. 🌼 Если дождь вновь не разгуляется, тогда разгуляемся мы — ждем всех уже завтра, 21 июля, в 19:00, у Ново-Тихвинского храма Подробности тут в наушниках (и без) пройдем от метро «Геологическая» до Зеленой рощи и Ново-Тихвинского м

9🦄2

16 Jul 2026, 15:41 UTC359 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Книжный «Буквально» закрывается. Здравствуйте, Анна! Это Владимир) Извините, что субботним вечером беспокою Вас В прошлом году мы вместе с моей подругой (а в недавнем прошлом одногруппницей) Верой Есаулковой придумали музыкальный проект «Диалоги-диалоги» — публичные лекции <...> Мы сейчас ищем площадку, чтобы в рамках проекта запустить новый цикл. И нам очень понравился Ваш магазин! К тому же, нам рекомендовали Ва

💔178🕊2

15 Jul 2026, 12:24 UTC235 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Внимание подписчикам-подписчикам! Наша совместная с Екатарсисом звуковая прогулка переносится на 21 июля, 19:00 — вы сами видите, что творится за окном🌧 🌞 Рассчитываем, что 21-го нам посчастливится увидеть солнышко, и все желающие смогут присоединиться к последней в июле прогулке! дожди-дожди

5🔥4

14 Jul 2026, 14:08 UTC190 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @pv41sbPhoto

сегодня абсолютно удачно привлек музыкальных ребят Веру и Володю @dialogidialogi к вечерним наброскам ( тк я знаю в каких кругах они крутятся я попросил их оставить свой почерк ) ~ в своих размышлениях продолжаю искать форму и внешний вид для личных проектов к которым буду стремиться приглашать других людей

💘84

13 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC183 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Клуб «Екатарсис» позвал нас провести звуковую прогулку, уже вам знакомую — в мае вместе с ПП мы гуляли вокруг метро «Геологическая», парка «Зеленая роща» и Ново-Тихвинского монастыря. ✨ Для всех, кто тогда не успел присоединиться, — есть шанс погулять и послушать любимый город 15 июля, в эту среду, в 19:00 Подробности тут в наушниках (и без) пройдем от метро «Геологическая» до Зеленой рощи и Ново-Тихвинского монас

13

13 Jul 2026, 11:36 UTC166 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Полное слияние со звуковой средой🌞 В субботу диалоги-диалоги превзошли самих себя и поучаствовали сразу в двух событиях: 1⃣Мы досконально изучили Сад трав и как он звучит. Лежали на траве, слушали шмелей, рыбаков, плески воды и голоса отдыхающих людей. Слушали Кейджа — а остальную музыку нашей прогулки можете найти в этом посте 2⃣Сходили к Пространству Политика на паблик-ток. Вместе с нами выступали трое спикеров:

6💘6🥰1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @dialogidialogi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 146,098 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“диалоги-диалоги” (@dialogidialogi), 356 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dialogidialogi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.