Channel
@vladicona
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
161subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001572583996 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vladicona |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vladicona |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 161 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 161 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 4 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (4 December 2025 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 288 |
| Reactions total | 15 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
97 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39 | 40.2% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 28.9% | |
| 🤣 | 23 | 23.7% | |
| 💅 | 4 | 4.12% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 2.06% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 December 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кризис на рынке труда начал сказываться даже на сфере личных продаж. С появлением щенка в доме количество касаний с тем или иным видом услуг геометрически возросло. В результат — полное разочарование. Ответы по 5 часов, навязывание услуг по скрипту и полное отсутствие диалога (вместо которого полотнища текста). И это при ценниках в половину региональной зарплаты. Также кризис не щадит форматы работы - онлайн услуг…
💩2🔥1
«Я часть той силы, что вечно хочет зла и вечно совершает благо». Какая красивая формулировка из «Фауста». Искусство.
❤3
Нет повести печальнее на свете, чем повесть о пиарщике, от которого требуют прямые лиды
🤣8😢1
Удача любит подготовленных. Всего три слова, которые складываются в сильный жизненный принцип. Если бы вы выиграли миллион долларов или попали на самое желанное место работы, как бы поступили? Насколько вы готовы правильно распорядиться подарком судьбы? 😁 А если не готовы, то никакая удача и не поможет.
❤4🔥1
Я фанат быстрых согласований
❤5🤣1
Недавно пересеклись два мира: знакомый блогер, с которым я работал и за которым слежу уже 6 лет и моя бывшая ученица, работающая теперь корреспондентом на РОССИЯ 1 (очень горжусь🫶). Одновременно с этим писал знакомый из тв-тусовки (ранее MTV, сейчас Первый канал) и спрашивал о планах на будущее, чего от него я вообще не ожидал И случилось это максимально рандомно, что заставило улыбнуться и отвлечься от нынешней суе…
❤5🔥2
Наблюдаю за Викой Боней с 2017. Человек прошел органичную и очень сильную эволюцию. Не исключаю, что нынешние волнения - манипуляция гражданской позицией, но радует, что хоть какое - то проявление адекватности и свежего воздуха. К Соловьеву давно вопросы. Отсутствие реальной культуры отмены и доминирование связей в РФ достигли апогея
❤7
Недавно коллегам рассказывал про свой метод коммуникации с журналистами: он кажется лицемерным, и людям сложно поверить, что я ИСКРЕННЕ желаю всегда добра и рассыпаюсь в комплиментах. Почему нет? Изнуряющая профессия, сложные будни, откуда еще брать позитив? Больше всего мне запомнилась фраза: «Языком чудеса творишь». Банально, двусмысленно и пошло, но мне было приятно.
🤣6💅4
Сидит женщина в автобусе передо мной и обсуждает насущные проблемы: ее подруге нужно получить какую-то справку, которую выдают только в ГИБДД. Что она посоветовала подруге? Цитата: «Да ты сдохнешь быстрее, чем ее получишь». Сильно.
🤣8
Очень понравился этот текст от PSmusic, он полностью отражает мои мысли и поясняет, почему я не поздравляю с этим праздником: Я не поклонник поздравлений с гендерными праздниками еще больше я не поклонник того, как многие вспоминают о чьих-то правах или резко начинают кого-то ценить раз в году вместе глобальным напоминанием. это еще хуже, чем полное игнорирование я предпочитаю поддерживать и любить тех, кто этого …
❤6🔥6
Без заголовка и без слова на букву «з». А нет, вот слово заебали пусть будет. Моя бабушка в 70х работала в городской администрации. Была то ли бухгалтером, то ли паспортистом (???). И в те годы после вуза по распределению направили студентов (обязательная отработка). Примерно наши ровесники, 20-25 лет. Их тогда называли «специалистами». И бабушка рассказывала (я специально спрашивал), что главное в работе с ними был…
🔥9❤5
На связи особые коллеги 🫰 Спросила у PR-специалистов из разных поколений про их ассоциации с Новым годом, какие тренды помогут выделить новогоднюю рекламную или пиар-кампанию и какую праздничную рекламу они любят больше всего. Спойлер: победила Coca-Cola )) Получились разноплановые ответы от зумеров, миллениалов и иксов. Спасибо за участие коллегам: Евгении Немчиновой, Записки из опенспейса Нине Ваниной, Ванина вс…
🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @vladicona. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,371,778 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PRодуктивная икона | Влад Колногоров” (@vladicona), 161 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vladicona.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.