Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ванина встала и пошла

@vanina_pr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,880subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001669715131
TypeChannel
Username@vanina_pr
Created13 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vanina_pr

Growth

1,8721,8801,8766 August 2026 — 1,872 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,872 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,876 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,879 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,880 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,871–1,881 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:251,880+1
9 Aug 2026, 21:111,879+3
6 Aug 2026, 20:581,876+4
6 Aug 2026, 06:471,872no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:041,872first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 1,880 subscribers
Avg views / post
204
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held13 (28 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,647
Reactions total180
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

157 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7145.2%
😁3924.8%
💯127.64%
🔥117.01%
🥰95.73%
🤣42.55%
🦄42.55%
👍31.91%
🌚21.27%
👌10.637%
🤔10.637%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC87 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот только писала про хайпующих на проверках салонов красоты и косметологических клиник блогеров и говорила о разнице между ними и Еленой Летучей, и вот та заходит на территорию медицины. Вышло ее шоу "Новый Ревизорро", в котором она устраивает разнос стоматологическим клиникам и кабинетам. Смотреть такой контент, где через слово — манипуляции и триггеры — мне было сложно. "Пятница", знаем, "специализируется" на форм

5👌1

7 Aug 2026, 05:20 UTC139 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Простите, а вот эти "нативные" книжные рекомендации от ботов в комментариях — они прям от книжных издательств, да? Кто-то так реально книжки продвигает или там скам какой-то?

🤣4😁31

6 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC154 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#ябегу День первый и возможно последний. Решила включить бег в спортивную рутину. Посмотрим, насколько меня хватит. Если снимать UGC, то, например, такое. @lapochkadrinks возьмёте в контент-завод?

11🔥4🦄4🤔1

6 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC164 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Просто скрин из поиска в запрещенной сети. Просто бренды бравируют тем, что отказываются от работы с блогерами. Бюджеты растут, а доверие аудитории падает. Ну, во-первых, никогда не говори "никогда". Ей-богу, будто новости не читают, и не в курсе, как быстро у нас все меняется. Во-вторых, а какая альтернатива? Контент-заводы? Сложить все яйца в одну корзину нерационально. Если контент массовый, по одному сценарию н

5👍2

3 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC225 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А пойдёмте-ка с вами поучимся маркетингу? Как мы на прошлой неделе выяснили, сейчас нужно подтягивать свои навыки под запросы клиентов, а не искать того самого "идеального", кому пригодятся твои компетенции. Говорят, что маркетологи цифры считают лучше пиарщиков. Вот и проверим. Иду на 4-недельный интенсив "Маркетинг, который замечают" от SETTERS EDUCATION. Будем разбираться как в условиях сокращения бюджетов сохран

8👍1

3 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC196 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В параллельной вселенной все еще существуют косметологи без высшего медицинского образования, берущие в руки шприцы и лазерные аппараты. И пациенты, которые не боятся ходить к таким. В выходные случился очередной "желтый" скандал: жена блогера Курбана Омарова вроде как была принята полицией за оказание косметологических услуг без диплома врача. Инициатором проверки стала некий блогер Марина Ильина, известная разобла

💯63

1 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC201 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я раньше злой такой почему была? Потому что у меня косыночка вокруг талии не повязывалась😅 А теперь я мерч @icon_skin как все модницы ношу!

😁16🥰93

31 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC253 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Денег нет, но мы держимся Бизнесу сейчас непросто. И мы, пиарщики с маркетологами, как обычно первыми идем под сокращения: 26 резюме на одну вакансию сейчас, по данным hh. Я адепт работы с репутацией в долгую: планомерно, шаг за шагом, завоевывая доверие аудитории. Но когда бюджет на продвижение сильно ограничен, последние кровно заработанные лучше отдать на Яндекс.Директ или интеграцию у лояльного блогера. Паралле

9🔥2

30 Jul 2026, 18:28 UTC237 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Простите, немного не поняла... Это тренд такой в запретграме, если вы тоже не очень поняли😅

8🔥5😁5

30 Jul 2026, 16:07 UTC226 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Реальность такова, какой мы сами ее хотим видеть Так работает селективное восприятие: человек замечает, интерпретирует и лучше запоминает прежде всего то, что согласуется с его ожиданиями и убеждениями, а противоречащие факты игнорирует или обесценивает. Опубликовала в Тредс пост про то, что не хочу для своей дочери жизни без спорта, потому что на своем опыте и с вечной справкой от физры знаю: в слабенькой тушке то

6💯3🌚2

29 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC236 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Про партнерства и коллаборации Когда искала партнёров для нашего пиар-ивента, заметила любопытное. Даже не то, что кто-то сначала "окает", потом уходит в закат с концами. Это как раз обычное дело. Любопытно, что были те, кто пытался рассказать, что "это так не работает". Просто предоставить подарки для гостей/один подарок на розыгрыш и передать организаторам информацию о себе для включения в программу ведущим (базо

9

29 Jul 2026, 05:28 UTC254 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Люди, которые отписываются через 540 дней, вы куда вообще? Мы уже почти родственники. Работали вместе, детей растили. Вы там пишите, как устроились на новом месте, переживаю. Если что, я всех вижу в боте👀😅

😁153💯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @vanina_pr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 266,414 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ванина встала и пошла” (@vanina_pr), 1,880 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vanina_pr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.