Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Владарг Дельсат

Channel

Владарг Дельсат

@vladargdelsat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

358subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002115531738
TypeChannel
Username@vladargdelsat
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vladargdelsat

Growth

357358357.56 August 2026 — 357 subscribers6 August 2026 — 357 subscribers14 August 2026 — 358 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 357–358 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 02:09358+1
6 Aug 2026, 21:04357no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:51357first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.4%
avg views ÷ 358 subscribers
Avg views / post
87.3
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
23.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,745
Reactions total402
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

402 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20450.7%
🔥9523.6%
🦄256.22%
custom 5262702197489045271174.23%
custom 5474506744459703063143.48%
👍112.74%
💋102.49%
🥰102.49%
custom 526037911410315023551.24%
❤‍🔥30.746%
👏30.746%
🥴30.746%
😐20.498%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 402reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 20 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vladargdelsat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 01:04 UTC36 views22 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

А еще Настя начинает понимать, что такое "рабочий", особенно на хлебозаводе. Ведь было время, когда не было воды, света, всего, но хлебозавод делал хлеб. А еще принимается наша героиня оценивать то будущее через призму блокады. Одноклассниц своих, окружавших там ее людей, папу, маму, себя. И вот себя она судит жестко. Глупость свою обличает медсестра ленинградской скорой. "Я себе и не представляла даже, какая почётн

11🔥6🦄5

5 Aug 2026, 01:04 UTC46 views16 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Блокадная школа и ее "зимняки". Тех, кто учился в "смертное" время, кто находил в себе силы дойти до школы, потом уже стали называть именно так. Военное поколение, выученное в блокаду самыми лучшими учителями на свете. Ведь старались они давать уроки интересно, увлекательно, чтобы слушали их. И вот Настя наша, с отогретой у печки чернильницей снова оказывается в классе. А Сережи, что поприветствовал ее в первый раз,

13🔥3

4 Aug 2026, 01:04 UTC63 views19 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

И хоть в своем времени закончила Настя девять классов, а вот сейчас идет в седьмой. С восьми лет до 1944 года шли в школу, взрослым был седьмой класс, уверенным, находя в себе силы в "смертное" страшное время учиться. "Здесь наш фронт". И учеба их тоже была помощью фронту, помощью сражающейся стране. И вот теперь сравнивает Настя. "— Здравствуйте, — приветствую я их. — Меня зовут Настя Зернова, я буду учиться с вами

9custom 52627021974890452716🥴2😐2

3 Aug 2026, 01:04 UTC72 views25 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

В детском эвакогоспитале, которым стала больница имени Раухфуса, очень хорошо видят возраст Насти, но еще и не понимают ее статуса. Ее характеризовали, как оказывавшую помощь со знанием дела. И вот именно это странно. Поэтому ее опрашивают. Когда не ожидает она, просто вопросы задают, а Настя отвечает. Основываясь на опыте блокады, на архивах, на книгах прочитанных отвечает она то, что сейчас еще неизвестно. Ноябрь с

14🦄6🔥5

2 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC78 views36 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

С пылу, с жару! Для тех, кто не любит читать про ВОВ, но ничего не имеет против славянского фэнтези. Для тех, кто любит сильных девочек. Для всех-всех. Шестнадцатилетняя Лада готова на что угодно, лишь бы подняться в небо. Даже выдержать отбор самой Яги, освоить упрямую ступу и доказать, что летницам есть место рядом с лучшими воинами Тридесятого государства. Здесь Кощей вовсе не враг, а вождь, мудро правящий стран

🔥16custom 547450674445970306310👍64

2 Aug 2026, 01:04 UTC80 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

(Нейросеть задолбала, потому будут иллюстрации). И вот у нас аттракцион. Серая кабинка, инструктаж. Выбирает наша Настя не сказку, не условные Мальдивы, а "сюрприз". И кажется ей, будто не просто так он сюрпризом назван, да выбор свой менять не хочет она. Вспышка, а затем она как-то вмиг оказывается на улице. На Невском, в ноябре сорок первого года, вот только не понимает она этого. А рефлексы у нее уже есть. Рефлек

9👍5custom 54745067444597030634

1 Aug 2026, 01:04 UTC76 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Библиотекарша объясняет Насте, отчего она изменилась. На самом деле, такое влияние ничуть не сюрприз, особенно для юной девушки, желающей странного. И доказать ей хотелось, и важной быть, и понять еще многое. Ну а принимая дневники, пропуская их сквозь себя, неожиданно на себя она примерила то время и тех людей. Именно изменившийся ее голос, язык, больше на тот похожий и выдает это изменение. "Я же в вакууме была, н

9🔥4👏3

31 Jul 2026, 01:04 UTC83 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Меняют книги Настю. А ведь там описана не только учеба и норма хлеба. там и о врачах много. И завидно ей просто, но вот прочитав, она задумывается. А тут у нее бабушка имеется - врач, и прабабушка еще жива. дед и прадед нет уже, а женщины держатся. Прабабушке в блокаду пятнадцать было, а во время повествования под сто лет. Есть блокадники, что живы до сих пор, есть, так что достоверно все. Но вот бабушка понимает уж

8🔥3🥰3

30 Jul 2026, 01:04 UTC86 views24 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Готовя доклад на тему блокады Ленинграда, Настя хочет особенной стать. Выделиться, что для таких девочек дело обыкновенное. Вот только в школе своей она в вакууме, да и в жизни, что у нее есть? Телефон, собственные капризы и... И все. Так действительно бывает, только часто депрессией заканчивается. А Настя у нас петербурженка, и история города для нее не пустой звук. "— Вот как… — она поднимается со своего места мед

12🔥7🦄5

29 Jul 2026, 21:23 UTC87 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Самый необыкновенный отзыв на "Душе не давая сгибаться", который я видел. https://t.me/buchperle/551 #писательство

🔥11🥰7

29 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC88 views12 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

В 1942 году в Ленинграде была издана "Ленинградская Поэма" Ольги Берггольц. Ленинградцы и не только они, знали эти стихи наизусть. Тогда-то и стали называть Ольгу Федоровну "ленинградской музой". #личное

9🔥3

29 Jul 2026, 01:04 UTC98 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Эта непростая история начинается не с приключений, и не со сказок. Более-менее соверменная девушка заканчивает девятый класс и думает, куда податься. Папа из рабочих, мама — врач "скорой помощи", достаток вы себе представляете. Выбор между техникумом и школой, да только будто в вакууме живет наша Настя Миронова. Знакомо, не так ли? "Утро начинается ожидаемо со скандала. Мама моя, докторша ездовая — так ее папа назыв

11🔥9💋7🥴1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vladargdelsat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 342,775 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Владарг Дельсат” (@vladargdelsat), 358 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vladargdelsat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.