2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 499–501 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 10:00
500
no change
8 Aug 2026, 05:19
500
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.8%
avg views ÷ 500 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.9
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
12 (3 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
631
Reactions total
42
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 00s
Average length
1m 00s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
67 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
35
52.2%
🔥
21
31.3%
🙏
6
8.96%
❤🔥
4
5.97%
🥰
1
1.49%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Если у вас один или несколько ответов А не переживайте: каждому из нас это свойственно по умолчанию.
Ответы группы В бывают у людей, которые занимались тренировкой ума.
Тренировка ума начинается с концептуализации - умения видеть суть и называть точным словом.
Концептуализация - это про умение мыслить. Но в обычной жизни дает много плюсов:
* В отношениях вместо того, чтобы в сотый раз выяснять «кто прав», помога…
В Малом Тибете, откуда я вернулась несколько дней назад, в буддийских храмах мы изучали причины (омрачения), которые лишают ум покоя и ведут по ложному пути.
У каждого омрачения есть противоядие, которое возвращает ясность и покой ума.
Противоядием жадности, например, является щедрость, эгоизма – забота о других.
Но у всех омрачений один общий корень – невежество, ложное восприятие вещей.
Противоядие невежества - м…
Собираем с участниками путешествие в Малый Тибет
Самая комфортная и легкая, и при этом самая глубокая и сложносоставная поездка, где соединились 4 линии:
🔵духовная (внутренний опыт, открытия и изменения каждого участника)
🔵эстетика и комфорт (красивые отели, вкусные рестораны, прекрасные пейзажи, уникальные вещи ручной работы, хорошее размещение и сервис)
🔵приключения (попасть в тайные залы древних монастырей и п…
— Вы - 12-ая группа, -
секьюрити называет нашу очередь перед встречей с Далай Ламой.
Мы идем по дорожке к летнему дворцу Шевацель - резиденции Далай Ламы в Лехе.
Начинается дождь, и нас зовут пройти в комнату ожидания вместе с другими гостями.
Мы одни из первых, кто сегодня встречается с Далай Ламой.
Когда дождь прекратился, все вышли к крыльцу и встали в очередь. С зелеными кадаками в руках - шарфами для благослов…
Смысловое путешествие в Малый Тибет
Вчера мы приземлились в Ладакке. Высота 3600 м. Первый день - отдых и адаптация к высокогорью.
Сегодня началось наше путешествие по древним буддийским монастырям и хребтам Гималаев.
Первый монастырь - Тикси, копия дворца Далай Лам - Паталы.
Потемневшие от времени фрески главного медитативного зала.
Комната Защитников, заряженная силой.
Древняя библиотека с манускриптами.
Зал с о…
Сегодня День рождения Далай Ламы
Сегодня утром в Лехе, в летнем дворце Шевацель, отпраздновали 91-ый год Далай Ламы.
Я познакомилась с Его Святейшеством Далай Ламой в 2016 году в Риге и получила посвящение в изучение философии буддизма и Бодхичитты - практику сострадания и заботы о живых существах.
С тех пор я много раз посещала Тибет и Ладакк.
Продолжала изучать философию буддизма как феноменологию сознания. Она …
Здесь я рассказываю о двух подходах в работе с собой:
🟤 создание внешней структуры за счет знаний, технологий, статуса, образа себя
🟤 создание внутренней структуры качеств, ценностей, талантов и способностей. Формирование цельности.
И о том, что мешает прийти к себе, увидеть свой потенциал и суть.
Полную запись эфира вы найдете здесь:
Смотреть на YouTube
Смотреть на RuTube
Тайминг:
00 - 19:00 - О двух подходах…
🔥5❤2🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @virtusspace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А. Прокручиваете в голове волнующую ситуацию снова и снова88%
В. Думаете несколько минут, приходите к решению и больше к мыслям об этой ситуации не возвращаетесь13%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 892,993 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Declared links
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юлия Монина || ВИРТУС 💎 Академия коучинга и смыслов” (@virtusspace), 500 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/virtusspace.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.