Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Vip

@vip_nettt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

11,129subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002087997733
TypeChannel
Username@vip_nettt
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vip_nettt

Growth

11,12911,15111,14011 August 2026 — 11,151 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,151 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,141 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,129 subscribers11 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 2 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,126–11,154 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:4511,129-12
12 Aug 2026, 11:1411,141-10
11 Aug 2026, 18:3011,151no change
11 Aug 2026, 18:1711,151first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

79 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1417.7%
👍1417.7%
🔥1417.7%
🤬1113.9%
😭1012.7%
👏911.4%
💔33.80%
😢33.80%
👎11.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2025 to 17 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 May 2026, 16:09 UTC724 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

⚠️ هشدار مهم درباره کلاهبرداری با «تتر فیک» در معامله گیفت‌های تلگرام 🎁🚫 اخیراً بعضی کلاهبردارها برای خرید گیفت‌های تلگرام از «تتر فیک» استفاده می‌کنند 🎭. در این روش، تتر واقعاً به کیف پول شما منتقل می‌شود 💸 و حتی تراکنش هم در شبکه دیده می‌شود 👁️، اما در واقع آن توکن USDT واقعی نیست ❌ و فقط یک توکن جعلی با اسم مشابه است که هیچ ارزشی ندارد 💣. بعضی از این اسکمرها یک توکن جدید می‌سازند 🛠️ که اسم و نمادش شبیه تتر (USDT

1

6 Mar 2026, 22:07 UTC≈1,430 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

لیست کلاهبرداران گزارش شده طبق گزارش‌های مردمی، این لیست شامل مواردی است که پس از دریافت وجه، یا کانفیگ غیرفعال تحویل داده‌اند، یا پشتیبانی را قطع کرده و کاربر را بلاک کرده‌اند. ربات‌های کلاهبردار (Bots): @BuyVPNRBOT @BuyVPN_SUP @NewBuyVPN @BuyVpnv @TajNet_bot @TakTazTambot @oxigenvpn3bot @Vi_NetBot @rayonetrobot @VPNHamrahBOT @HiVpnShopBot @GARDNET_BOT @kajnet_bot @NaYabNetBot @NitroShopRoBot @VaslSho1_bot @Servere

👍7

14 Feb 2026, 09:01 UTC≈1,690 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

✍️ قیمت بروز و لحظه ای(شنبه)👇 💵دلار = 159,050 تومان 💸 یورو = 188,750 تومان 🪙سکه جدید = 194,000,000 🪙سکه قدیم = 189,000,000 🪙 سکه نیم = 97,500,000 🪙 سکه ربع = 55,700,000 تومان 🪙مثقال طلا = 84,230,000 تومان ⚖️ گرم۱۸عیار= 19,440,000 تومان 🪙 اونس = 5,041 دلار 💸 بیت کوین = 68,852 دلار 💵 تتر = 161,670 تومان

👍4

12 Feb 2026, 09:34 UTC≈1,350 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

✍️ قیمت بروز و لحظه ای(۵شنبه)👇 💵دلار = 161,450 تومان 💸 یورو = 191,500 تومان 🪙سکه جدید = 200,020,000 🪙سکه قدیم = 195,570,000 🪙 سکه نیم = 101,720,000 🪙 سکه ربع = 56,830,000 تومان 🪙مثقال طلا = 86,850,000 تومان ⚖️ گرم۱۸عیار= 20,050,000 تومان 🪙 اونس = 5,049 دلار 💸 بیت کوین = 67,188 دلار 💵 تتر = 163,990 تومان

👍3

6 Feb 2026, 09:25 UTC≈1,650 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🤑🔽 بیت کوین همچنان با کله داره میاد پایین!

🔥8😢21

5 Feb 2026, 11:57 UTC≈1,600 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔽🤑 بیت کوین به زیر 70 هزار دلار سقوط کرد.

👏9🤬1

4 Feb 2026, 07:51 UTC≈1,410 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🪙‼️انس جهانی دوباره ۵ هزار دلاری شد!

💔3

3 Feb 2026, 19:13 UTC≈1,510 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

جنگ = ریزش بازار کریپتو جنگ = بالا رفتن اونس جهانی طلا و نفت

1

3 Feb 2026, 19:11 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🤑🔽 قیمت بیت کوین به زیر ۷۳۰۰۰ دلار رسید. 🔻۲۸۵ میلیون دلار در ۶۰ دقیقه گذشته از بازار ارزهای دیجیتال لیکویید شده است!

29 Jan 2026, 16:48 UTC≈1,950 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

‼️ در بازار ارز دیجیتال خون به پا شد!

🔥6😢1

29 Jan 2026, 07:49 UTC≈1,910 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

‼️‼️‼️دلار 167,000‼️‼️‼️

🤬5

29 Jan 2026, 07:49 UTC≈1,860 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

‼️‼️‼️طلا ۲۲ میلیون ‼️‼️‼️

🤬5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vip_nettt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 841,846 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vip” (@vip_nettt), 11,129 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vip_nettt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.