کیفیت وی پی ان های رایگان به روایت تصویر 🥺 ( کیفیت بیشتر شون در حد تل باز کردن هست و مناسب گشتن در یوتوب و اینستا نیست ) اگه دنبال یه وی پی ان با کیفیت هستی ربات و استارت کن : 👇 🫐 @Lexonet_bot
🔥9🏆6❤5⚡3👏2

Channel
@lexonet
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
147,132subscribers
-1,454 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002591484566 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lexonet |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lexonet |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:14 | 147,132 | -200 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 147,332 | -135 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 147,467 | -189 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 147,656 | -231 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 147,887 | -218 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 148,105 | -204 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 148,309 | -244 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 148,553 | -33 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 148,586 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 148,586 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (14 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 97,180 |
| Reactions total | 224 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
234 reactions across 13 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 88 | 37.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 25 | 10.7% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 9.83% | |
| 👏 | 21 | 8.97% | |
| 🤝 | 19 | 8.12% | |
| 🥰 | 14 | 5.98% | |
| 🤩 | 13 | 5.56% | |
| 🙏 | 10 | 4.27% | |
| 🏆 | 8 | 3.42% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 2.99% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.28% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 0.855% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.427% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 234reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
کیفیت وی پی ان های رایگان به روایت تصویر 🥺 ( کیفیت بیشتر شون در حد تل باز کردن هست و مناسب گشتن در یوتوب و اینستا نیست ) اگه دنبال یه وی پی ان با کیفیت هستی ربات و استارت کن : 👇 🫐 @Lexonet_bot
🔥9🏆6❤5⚡3👏2
با اینکه خیلی از سرویس ها و اپ های رایگان تو این شرایط طبق گفته کاربرا و اخبار قطع شدن ما همچنان قوی و پایدار وصلیم 😎 از جایی بخر که تو هر شرایطی وصله 👇 🫐 @Lexonet_bot
❤9❤🔥3👏2🔥2🙏1
اگه با کد خریدید لایک بزنید ببینم چقدر ری اکشن میگیره ❤️
❤14🙏4🤩3🤝2🥰2
🫐 تعرفه بسته های لگزونت با احتساب تخفیف 25 درصد 📦 10 گیگ | 80,000 👈 60,000 📦 20 گیگ | 140,000 👈 105,000 📦 30 گیگ | 180,000 👈 135,000 💎 50 گیگ | 250,000 👈 187,500 برای خرید فوری بات و استارت کنید : 👇 🫐 @Lexonet_bot 🫐 @Lexonet_bot
❤🔥7🥰5🤩4🤗2🔥1
25 درصد تخفیف فقط برای 200 نفر ⭐ این کد برای 200 نفر اولی که خرید بزنن هستش و برای هر تمام محصولات داخل بات جوابه عزیزان . سریع بزنید تا فرصت رو از دست ندید . 🎅 کد تخفیف : LEXO1000
❤🔥8🤝3🙏3🏆2👏1
انقد خوب بودید که ربات شما رو به دوستامم معرفی کردم 😎 اینکه میاید و انرژی مثبت بهمون توی این مسیر میدید خیلی حس خوبیه . به این انرژی مثبتاتون به چشم سوخت برای ادامه مسیرمون نگاه میکنیم و دمتون گرمه کلی رفقا 🌹 ربات و استارت کن و سرویسی رو بخر که برای همیشه از سرویس با کیفیت تامین بشی 👇 🫐 @Lexonet_bot
🤝7❤5❤🔥3🥰3👏2
پینگ هایی که از سرویس ها میبینی واقعیه ❗️ با این اینترنت نا امید کننده ایران بتونی از وی پی ان همچین پینگی بگیری به دور از ذهنه . ولی با سرویس های ما یعنی لگزونت تجربه این داستان خیلی عجیب غریب نیست 😉 همین الان ربات و استارت کن و سرعت فضایی و با تست رایگانمون امتحان کن 👇 🫐 @Lexonet_bot
❤8🔥5🥰4⚡2🤩1
میدونستید بات مون تست رایگانم داره ؟ 🤔 اگه تا الان کیفیت سرویسمون و تست نکرده بودی و دو دل بودی، الان بهترین موقع هست برای تست کیفیت سرویس هامون . که شمام شاهد فضایی بودن سرعت و کیفیت بشید 👽 همین الان برای دریافت تست رایگان ربات و استارت کن 👇 🫐 @Lexonet_bot
❤7💯3⚡2👏2🤝2
با اینکه خیلی از دوستان و عزیزان بهمون برجسب کلاه برداری زدن و گفتن ما اسکم هستیم ما تمامی اشتراک هایی که کاربرا خریده بودن قبل این اتفاقات ( اعتراضات و جنگ و... ) داشتن و پاک کردیم و براشون مجدد به همون اندازه اعتبار شارژ کردیم و رضایت تک به تک عزیزان و جلب کردیم . ( با اینکه قطعی دست ما نبوده و کاری نمیشد بکنیم ) 🌹❤️ همچنان پای کاریم و تهعد به مشتری و جلب رضایت شما عزیزان وظیفه برند ماست رفقا 🫡 از جایی خرید کنید ک…
❤24❤🔥4👏4🔥1🤩1
تست اینستاگرام 😍 با سرویس لگزونت 🫐 تاریخ تست شده : 4/25 📆 اپراتور تست شده : همراه اول 🛜 برای خرید فوری و دریافت تست رایگان بات و استارت کنید : 👇 🫐 @Lexonet_bot 🫐 @Lexonet_bot
❤4🔥2👏1🤝1🤩1
🫐 تعرفه بسته های لگزونت با احتساب تخفیف 20 درصد 📦 10 گیگ | 80,000 👈 64,000 📦 20 گیگ | 140,000 👈 112,000 📦 30 گیگ | 180,000 👈 144,000 💎 50 گیگ | 250,000 👈 200,000 برای خرید فوری بات و استارت کنید : 👇 🫐 @Lexonet_bot 🫐 @Lexonet_bot
❤5🔥2🤩2🙏2👏1
20 درصد تخفیف روی خرید بعدی که بخواید بزنید ⚡️ توجه داشته باشید که ظرفیت این کد فقط 150 نفره و اولویت با کساییه که زود تر خرید بزنن 📸 🎁 نام کد تخفیف : lexonet311 برای خرید فوری بات و استارت کنید : 👇 🫐 @Lexonet_bot 🫐 @Lexonet_bot
❤5👏2🎉1🔥1🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @lexonet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 302,437 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال فروش فیلترشکن | لگزونت” (@lexonet), 147,132 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lexonet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.