Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کانال فروش فیلترشکن | لگزونت

Channel

کانال فروش فیلترشکن | لگزونت

@lexonet

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

140,425subscribers

-8,161 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002591484566
TypeChannel
Username@lexonet
Description🔵 لگزونت وی پی ان فروش فیلتر شکن و سرویس کاهش پینگ بدون قطعی💪 🤖 | ربات خرید ← @Lexonet_bot 👨🏻‍💻 | پشتیبانی فروش ← @lexonet_sup ✅ | چنل اصلی ← @lexonet 📲 | چنل آموزش اتصال ← @lexonet_learn 🤝| چنل رضایت مشتریان ← @lexonet_stisfaction
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held37
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lexonet

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

140,425148,586144,505.55 August 2026 — 148,586 subscribers6 August 2026 — 148,586 subscribers6 August 2026 — 148,553 subscribers7 August 2026 — 148,309 subscribers8 August 2026 — 148,105 subscribers9 August 2026 — 147,887 subscribers10 August 2026 — 147,656 subscribers11 August 2026 — 147,467 subscribers11 August 2026 — 147,332 subscribers13 August 2026 — 147,132 subscribers14 August 2026 — 146,844 subscribers16 August 2026 — 146,438 subscribers17 August 2026 — 146,177 subscribers18 August 2026 — 145,943 subscribers19 August 2026 — 145,776 subscribers20 August 2026 — 145,569 subscribers21 August 2026 — 145,384 subscribers22 August 2026 — 145,077 subscribers24 August 2026 — 144,828 subscribers25 August 2026 — 144,677 subscribers26 August 2026 — 144,458 subscribers27 August 2026 — 144,306 subscribers28 August 2026 — 144,177 subscribers29 August 2026 — 143,932 subscribers30 August 2026 — 143,768 subscribers31 August 2026 — 143,628 subscribers1 September 2026 — 143,511 subscribers2 September 2026 — 143,375 subscribers3 September 2026 — 143,198 subscribers5 September 2026 — 143,048 subscribers8 September 2026 — 142,593 subscribers11 September 2026 — 142,298 subscribers13 September 2026 — 142,078 subscribers14 September 2026 — 141,902 subscribers16 September 2026 — 141,650 subscribers19 September 2026 — 141,343 subscribers25 September 2026 — 140,425 subscribers5 August 202625 September 2026
37 measurements spanning 51 days, net -8,161. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 139,201–149,810 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 22:37140,425-918
19 Sept 2026, 03:00141,343-307
16 Sept 2026, 18:01141,650-252
14 Sept 2026, 23:41141,902-176
13 Sept 2026, 07:18142,078-220
11 Sept 2026, 13:18142,298-295
8 Sept 2026, 18:15142,593-455
5 Sept 2026, 08:42143,048-150
3 Sept 2026, 10:58143,198-177
2 Sept 2026, 03:55143,375-136
1 Sept 2026, 05:45143,511-117
31 Aug 2026, 08:43143,628-140
30 Aug 2026, 08:56143,768-164
29 Aug 2026, 07:33143,932-245
28 Aug 2026, 08:36144,177-129
27 Aug 2026, 07:33144,306-152
26 Aug 2026, 07:07144,458-219
25 Aug 2026, 06:39144,677-151
24 Aug 2026, 06:11144,828-249
22 Aug 2026, 16:27145,077first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.51%
avg views ÷ 140,425 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,740
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.266%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held29 (14 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total77,360
Reactions total206
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 09:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
670
Videos
110
Links
41

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 39s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

598 reactions across 29 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤12420.7%
👏7212.0%
🤝6611.0%
🔥569.36%
🏆518.53%
❤‍🔥508.36%
🤩335.52%
🥰315.18%
🙏284.68%
💯213.51%
😍203.34%
⚡172.84%
🤣162.68%
🤗91.51%
😘30.502%
🎉10.167%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 598 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 07:57 UTC≈1,790 views15 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

بازم مثل همیشه دوستان بهمون لطف داشتن 😁 گوشه ای از رضایت های کاربران به پشتیبانی ❤️ دنبال بهترین سرویس دهنده نگرد . همین پایینه 👇 🫐 @lexonet_bot

❤4🏆3🤝3🥰3👏2

23 Sept 2026, 09:35 UTC≈3,770 views32 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

اگه اشتباهی هم پول زدی بهمون نگران پولت نباش 😎 این که بک نزنیم واقعا وسوسه کننده اس ولی چه کنیم با این مرام و معرفت به سبک پهلوان تختیمون 😐 از جایی خرید کن که بشه بهشون اعتماد کرد 👇 🫐 @lexonet_bot

🏆11👏8😍5🤝4🥰4

20 Sept 2026, 15:45 UTC≈8,900 views14 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

شما فقط 18 ثانیه وقت بزار و سرعت و ببین 😳 این سرعتی که دارید میبینید با اینترنت ایران هست و واقعیه 😉 دنبال بهترین سرویس دهنده نگرد . همین پایینه 👇 🫐 @lexonet_bot

👏5🔥3❤2🤝2🙏2

18 Sept 2026, 10:47 UTC≈5,810 views19 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

🧩 دنبال یه سرویس قوی روی ویندوز بودی ؟ ✅ باید بگم که سرویس لگزونت همون سرویسی هست که دنبالش بودی . هم برای گیم هم برای تلگرام و هم برای وب گردی و استفاده از AI روی ویندوز کارتون رو خیلی عالی راه میندازه و مناسب این داستاناست . دنبال بهترین سرویس دهنده نگرد . همین پایینه 👇 🫐 @lexonet_bot

🤝7❤4🏆4🔥2🙏2

14 Sept 2026, 20:12 UTC≈7,790 views18 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

جمنای که خوراک سرویس های لگزونته 😋 اینم تست جمنای این هفته با سرویس های فِرش و رو فرم لگزونت رفقا . از این اسون تر دیگ نداریم که محدودیت هارو رد کنه 🤫 باور نمیکنی ؟ بزن یه اکانت تست رایگان بگیر خودت ببین 👇 🫐 @lexonet_bot

🤝9🔥3🥰3👏2🤩1

11 Sept 2026, 15:07 UTC≈8,280 views24 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

هنوز از اکانت تست رایگان استفاده نکردی ؟ 🧐 اکانت تست برای همین موقع هاست که بین خریدن و نخریدن دو دلی . اول بیا تست کن ببین به درد کارت میخوره یا نه بعدش خرید بزن . به همین آسونی 😐 اگه تو هم دو دلی همین الان بزن و تست کن 👇 🫐 @lexonet_bot

🏆7🤩5🙏5🤝4❤‍🔥3

8 Sept 2026, 15:32 UTC≈8,650 views25 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

بعد خریدتون شما ول نمیشید به امون خدا 🙌 خیلی از عزیزان این صنف بعد خرید و گرفتن پول از شما خیلی تمایلی به حل کردن مشکلاتتون ندارن . این یه حقیقت تلخه . ولی ما اصول کاریمون این نیست که فقط بهتون بفروشیم و بعدش همه جوره در خدمت مشتری های عزیزمون هستیم . وظیفمونم هست ❤️ از کسی سرویس بخر که بعد خریدم شما رو دوست داشته باشن 👇 🫐 @lexonet_bot

👏10🏆4🔥4🙏4🤩3

5 Sept 2026, 09:04 UTC≈12,400 views22 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

تست پینگ همه آیپی ها زیر 170 هست 🤌 لگزونت همچنان رو فرمه از همه لحاظ 😎 دنبال بهترین سرویس دهنده نگرد . همین پایینه 👇 🫐 @lexonet_bot

❤‍🔥7😍5👏4💯3🤝3

1 Sept 2026, 19:24 UTC≈9,570 views20 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

یوتیوب رو از بدون فیلترش هم بهتر اورد بالا اورد 😎 یه تست یوتیوب گردی هم گفتیم بگیریم بعد چند وقت که نشون بدیم هنوز سرویس لگزونت از همه لحاظ رو فرمه و همه فن حریفه 🎥 سرویسی و بخرید که همه فن حریف باشه و در بلند مدت کیفیت شو حتما حفظ کنه 👇 🫐 @lexonet_bot

💯7❤‍🔥5🏆4🤗3👏1

28 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC≈10,400 views17 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

یه اسپید تست خیلی رندوم زدم پشمام ریخت 😐 معمولا این تایم ، تایم شلوغیه مصرف هست و ‌همیشه سرعت کمی کند میشه تو این تایما به خاطر مصرف بالا و ترافیک مصرفی . ولی برای لگزونت هیچ محدودیتی وجود نداره و این حرفا جلوی سرویس های ما فقط یه شوخیه 😉 باور نمیکنی ؟ ربات و استارت کن با اکانت تست خودت سرعت و ببین 👇 🫐 @lexonet_bot

🔥6🤩4😘3👏2🥰2

25 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC≈10,800 views25 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

وضعیت ما با بعضی از کاربرا 😂😂😂 بهترین سرویس با بهترین خدمات همین پایینه 👇 🫐 @lexonet_bot

🤣16🤗3❤‍🔥2💯2🔥2

22 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC≈11,300 views18 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

اینستا گردی با سرویس لگزونت 💬 اینستا رو بدون لحظه ای لگ و کندی داره میاره بالا . با سرویس لگزونت هیچ محدودیت و کندی سرعتی برای شما وجود نداره عملا . باور نمی کنی ؟ همین الان بات و استارت کن و با تست رایگان خودت تست کن 👇 🫐 @lexonet_bot

⚡6🏆4👏3🔥3😍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @lexonet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کانال فروش فیلترشکن | لگزونت” (@lexonet), 140,425 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lexonet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.