Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
46,300 average views per post against 66,993 subscribers — an engagement rate of 69.1%. Across the 3,067 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,627–99,869 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.41% and 12.2%, with a median of 5.96%.
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 69.0%
- avg views ÷ 67,056 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 46,300
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
7 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC≈29,900 viewsread 12 August 2026 Photo
جهت خرید فیلترشکن میتونید از ربات اقدام کنید ✅
درگاه پرداخت ریالی با دریافت آنی و اتومایتک اشتراک ✅
درگاه کارت به کارت ✅
2 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC≈42,100 viewsread 12 August 2026 Photo
جهت خرید فیلترشکن میتونید از ربات اقدام کنید ✅
درگاه پرداخت ریالی با دریافت آنی و اتومایتک اشتراک ✅
درگاه کارت به کارت ✅
2 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC≈52,200 viewsread 12 August 2026 Photo
جهت خرید و دریافت اتوماتیک فیلترشکن وارد ربات شوید و از طریق درگاه پرداخت اقدام کنید 🩵💻
1 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈46,500 viewsread 12 August 2026 Photo
Love ❤️
1 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC≈5,310 viewsread 12 August 2026 Photo
مردم ایران 🩵🇮🇷
1 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC≈4,290 viewsread 12 August 2026 Photo
☺️❤️💻
1 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC≈34,900 viewsread 12 August 2026 Photo
🤍🤍 Love
1 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC≈36,100 viewsread 12 August 2026 Photo
چیزایی که انگیزه راه منه 🤍
31 Jul 2026, 18:46 UTC≈4,250 viewsread 12 August 2026 Photo
بالاخره لایسنس اکسپرس ویندوز و مک موجود شد 😍🩷
خرید از ربات 👇
@BUYVPNRBOT
31 Jul 2026, 18:32 UTC≈4,930 viewsread 12 August 2026 Photo
جهت مشاهده آموزش راهندازی فیلترشکن مورد نظر روی لینک های زیر کلیک کنید ❤️
@BUYVPNRBOT ✅
26 Jul 2026, 23:18 UTC≈110,000 viewsread 12 August 2026 اطلاع رسانی :
ربات بروزرسانی شد .
برای خرید از ربات اقدام کنید
@BUYVPNRBOT
22 Jul 2026, 19:55 UTC≈113,000 viewsread 12 August 2026 آپدیت شد 🩵
افزایش سرعت و کیفیت ✔
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @filtershekan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 121,666 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
V2ray | کانفیگ رایگان
@V2rayFree_irr · 10,5184 postsاسکمر یاب
@scanscameriranian · 4,4593 postsTrendeFarsi
@ttrendefarsi · 20,2243 postsپشتیبانی داستان های جالب
@daanestaanii · 3332 postsFootFun | فوتفان
@FootFun2020 · 83,8402 posts@Alamut
@Abolfazlabolfazl10 · 531 postComputer Engineering
@Ceuk96 · 4201 postداستان های جذاب
@daneestannii · 22,4261 postگنـگ لَــ🚫ــنـد
@gang_texts · 26,4471 postاسکمر - معرفی کلاهبرداران
@ir_Scammer · 1591 postجالبدون🧠
@Jaleb_Dan · 68,3181 post•🧑🏻🎓بچه درسخونآ...
@lemonlanddd · 9,0241 postشناسایی سرکوبگران
@Mag_Zhaneh · 2,8711 postMåneskin iran
@maneskin_iran · 3,5331 postداستان های آموزنده
@sokhanannaaab · 13,4401 postتدوینگران | TadvinGaran
@TadvinGaranCom · 1,5751 postپشتیبانی ترفند
@tarfannnnnd · 2961 postطب سنتی
@teebsonatii · 8,6771 post💠Victoria Design
@Victoria_Design1 · 8251 postVip
@vip_nettt · 11,1411 postVpn saman کانال اختصاصی مشتریان
@vpnsamanv · 1861 postIranIRC Network
@VPNServ247 · 6,4051 postVpnVipProChannel
@VpnVipProChannel · 2821 postwebiwin.ir
@webiwin_ir · 1471 post A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فیلترشکن پرسرعت اکسپرس قوی” (@filtershekan), 67,056 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/filtershekan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.