Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for VIP LEAKS : PUBLIC

Channel

VIP LEAKS : PUBLIC

@vip_leaks_public

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

391subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002107240979
TypeChannel
Username@vip_leaks_public
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vip_leaks_public

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3913993957 August 2026 — 398 subscribers8 August 2026 — 398 subscribers8 August 2026 — 399 subscribers16 August 2026 — 393 subscribers23 August 2026 — 394 subscribers30 August 2026 — 393 subscribers8 September 2026 — 392 subscribers17 September 2026 — 391 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 41 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 390–400 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 19:15391-1
8 Sept 2026, 16:16392-1
30 Aug 2026, 15:34393-1
23 Aug 2026, 14:37394+1
16 Aug 2026, 03:04393-6
8 Aug 2026, 05:50399+1
8 Aug 2026, 05:49398no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:17398first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2656.5%
👍2043.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2024 to 16 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jun 2024, 10:18 UTC≈50,300 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Prelaunch Call ⚪️⚡️🪙 $Landy Coin, ( $LANDY ) Where the charm of Andy and the spirit of Landwolf converge in the vibrant world of cryptocurrency. Inspired by Matt Furie’s iconic characters, Landy Coin embraces the whimsical essence of internet culture and the meme economy. Get ready to embark on a meme-tastic journey with Landy Coin – where laughter meets innovation! 🌟 🔥: https://t.me/landysol 🔥: https://x.com/La

18👍15

16 Jun 2024, 10:01 UTC≈40,900 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

88x (🔥TON) Mittens 10M 💎 Good work @vip_leaks_public 🙀 https://t.me/Mittenston 🙀

1👍1

16 Jun 2024, 08:55 UTC≈38,200 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

80x (🔥TON) TRUMP 800k 🔥 Good work @vip_leaks_public 🤣 https://t.me/tontrump_cto

2👍1

16 Jun 2024, 08:10 UTC≈27,200 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

19x (🔥ETH) Biao 38M 💎 Good work @vip_leaks_public 🤣 https://t.me/biaoerc20

1👍1

16 Jun 2024, 07:12 UTC≈20,600 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

200x (🔥BASE) MAGA on BASE 5.6M 💎 now 5.1M Good work @vip_leaks_public 💧 https://t.me/magatrumpbaseportal

16 Jun 2024, 07:01 UTC≈16,100 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Pumpfun ⚪️⚡️🪙 Handicat New pumpfun. A cat with no arms. Raise going decently so far. ✅ https://t.me/+smjRhhvqZ401MTc8 🔗LINK: https://pump.fun/CuBS9fUpXZsijD188fGaq1NjqdJUVitE4orr8XZEpump 🔥CALLED BY @GEMSCALLS_6868🔥

16 Jun 2024, 06:26 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

12.5x Update (🔥ETH) Omochi 1.9M 💎 now 1.8M Called in @vip_leaks_public at 150k hit 1.9M now dip. Nice branding and ticker following Frog meta. Viral tiktok meme. Dyor if going in now https://t.me/OmochiERC https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x7dda400dcd59693a68dc41ef9044e127e413c0d9

16 Jun 2024, 06:08 UTC≈9,130 viewsread 8 August 2026

$amc looking like it’s ready for the next leg, distribution looks way better

16 Jun 2024, 06:08 UTC≈9,050 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#TURBO TOKEN, the next generation of xAI’s TURBO1, is coming to #MEXCKickstarter 🚀 🗳Vote with $MX to share massive airdrops 📈 #TURBO1/USDT Trading: 2024-06-17 08:00 (UTC) ⚡️ Promotion by: @GemHunterrs Details: https://www.mexc.com/support/articles/17827791516709

2👍2

16 Jun 2024, 06:07 UTC≈6,690 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

60x (🔥SOL) Satoshi Nakamoto 1.2M 💎 now 1M Good work @vip_leaks_public 👀 https://t.me/godfatherportal 🔥

1

16 Jun 2024, 04:43 UTC≈6,110 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

207x Update (🔥BASE) Boys Club 18.7M 💎 now 3.3M Called in @vip_leaks_public at 90k hit 18.7M. Dyor if going in now. Following Matt Furie meta. Links below. https://t.me/boysclubonbasechain https://dexscreener.com/base/0x0b1e820eb65289896cbb6b152ee1fa12ec3d2b18

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vip_leaks_public. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VIP LEAKS : PUBLIC” (@vip_leaks_public), 391 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vip_leaks_public.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.