Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Вайб Кодера

@vibe_codera

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

589subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003402426512
TypeChannel
Username@vibe_codera
DescriptionВайб свідомого кодера. Про AI, код і чому твоя голова — досі твій головний інструмент. Веду я — 20+ років у розробці, від ZX Spectrum до React.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/vibe_codera

Growth

5896 Aug 2026, 08:32 — 589 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:02 — 589 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 08:326 Aug 2026, 18:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 588–590 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 18:02589no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:32589first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
66.7%
avg views ÷ 589 subscribers
Avg views / post
393
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held20 (18 April 202624 July 2026)
Views total393
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
25
Links
24

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

181 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8547.0%
😁3821.0%
179.39%
🔥168.84%
💯73.87%
🤯42.21%
🤣31.66%
🤷‍♂31.66%
🍌21.10%
😢21.10%
👎10.552%
🤝10.552%
🥰10.552%
🥴10.552%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2026, 19:23 UTC763 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Paranoid. Майже Блек Себбат. Fable 5 таки вийшов в нас. Але та обгортка що навколо... я не знаю як у вас, але я через раз бачу таке Fable 5's safeguards flagged this message. The safeguards are intentionally broad right now and may flag safe and routine coding, cybersecurity, or biology work. These measures let us bring you Mythos-level capabilities sooner, and we're working to refine them. Switched to Opus 4.8. Se

🤣3🤷‍♂3

3 Jul 2026, 09:33 UTC603 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Всім привіт. Як ви тут без мене ?) Минув дуже пекельний місяць мого життя і нарешті я повернувся до каналу. За цей час я встиг: - написати і захистити диплом (Дуже вдячний всим хто прийняв участь в дослідженні. Вони будуть продовжуватись та поглиблюватись). • Зробити ретроспективу знань та навичок в роботі з ШІ, з самого початку і до тепер. Готую з цього приводу матеріал для публікації тут. Бо ми всі пройшли шлях

👍124🔥2

31 May 2026, 16:46 UTC707 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Всім доброго вечора. Шановні, я закінчую роботу над димпломом і скоро вже буду в строю. Але мне ще поки ніхто не прислав результати тестування, хто записувався. Перевірте пліз пошти. Тема листа: "Дослідження AI code review (з Вайб Кодера) - посилання всередині" Всім безмежно дякую.

👍5

23 May 2026, 13:32 UTC980 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

І вже підʼїхав проектик по видаленню таких водяних знаків ) https://github.com/aloshdenny/reverse-SynthID

😁13

23 May 2026, 12:21 UTC752 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Всім доброго дня. Сьогодні буде відправлено кожному, хто заповнив форму, іструкція та персональний код. Приділіть будь ласка трошки вільного часу на вихідних. Буду дуже вдячний. А якщо у вас виникне бажання прийняти участь, то можна ще до понеділка заповнити форму. Дуже дякую. —- Як закінчу з дослідами, планую велику пачку контенту. Як і матеріали які понаходив за цей час, аналітику, так і багато особистого до

👍4

19 May 2026, 20:55 UTC869 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Пройшов Google I/O 2026: що з цього реально для нас? Як завжди, багато гучних слів. Нові моделі Gemini 3.5 - Flash і Pro. Google каже, що Flash вчетверо швидший за конкурентів на виході токенів. На реальних замірах від користувачів - значно скромніше, як завжди буває з презентаційними цифрами. Але головна новина не в швидкості. Нові моделі щонайменше втричі дорожчі за попередні. Якщо ви будували щось на Gemini 2.x

👍13🥴1

13 May 2026, 18:03 UTC926 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Друзі, нагадую вам. Дуже потрібна ваша допомога з дослідами. Це всього 2-3 хвилини вашого часу

👍3

13 May 2026, 10:31 UTC≈1,660 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Якщо у вас горіли сраки та ви самі від LLm, то є новина ще гарячише - Mini Shai-Hulud. 169 пакетів, 373 заражені версії. Серед них — TanStack, Mistral, UiPath, Squawk. Трюк новий: до пакета додається optional-залежність з GitHub, у неї prepare-скрипт, який тягне Bun-payload. Краде все — npm-токени, GitHub-токени, AWS, K8s, Vault. Потім сам публікує нові заражені пакети від вашого імені. Найгірше — через trusted pu

👍10

12 May 2026, 19:07 UTC976 viewsread 6 August 2026

Всім привіт. Я роблю досліди про досвід використання AI code review tools. І мені дуже потрібна Ваша допомога. Про що дослід: я вивчаю, як розробники реагують на AI-коментарі під час code review. Що приймають, що відхиляють. Чи помічають різницю між точними і помилковими. Мета — зрозуміти, як зробити AI code review tools корисними, а не дратівливими. Заповнюєте форму — це ~2-3 хв. Там згода на участь, кілька питан

10 May 2026, 14:54 UTC739 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Наше майбутнє, коли нас замінить ШІ

😢2

7 May 2026, 17:20 UTC839 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Радість міленіала-задоота

🔥3🍌1🥰1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vibe_codera. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 818,219 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Вайб Кодера” (@vibe_codera), 589 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vibe_codera.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.