Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 51 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 180–183 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Sept 2026, 17:55
183
+1
14 Aug 2026, 18:03
182
+2
8 Aug 2026, 13:02
180
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:34
180
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 26 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
84 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
32
38.1%
❤🔥
28
33.3%
🔥
13
15.5%
🤔
4
4.76%
👎
2
2.38%
💩
2
2.38%
🤮
2
2.38%
👍
1
1.19%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Чувство вины по отношению к человеку - маркер его значимости для нас.
Эта мысль помогла мне сегодня как при консультации пары, так и в индивидуальной консультации.
Я был свидетелем того, как чувство вины одного партнёра перед другим, для другого было облегчением.
Как писала моя коллега тут:
Часто критически недостающим элементом близких отношений является идея - «то, что ты чувствуешь, важно для меня, потому что …
Можете ли подробно объяснить что такое извинение и зачем оно надо?
Да, сейчас объясню в комментариях27%
Не жмоться и поделись тем, что рассказал клиенту91%
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
При чём тут Пражский крысарик?
У меня для Вас есть важная новость, один более важный вопрос и один ну и вопрос обыкновенный.
Итак к новостям
Кажется моя "медийность" вышла на новый уровень, после того как на последние пару постов показали палец вниз, облевали его и обмазали какахами (судя по смайликам). Это может быть признаком наличия хейта, что является признаком нового этапа медийности.
Я все правильно рассужд…
На консультации с клиентом затронулась тема дружбы, да и в целом касается близких взаимоотношений.
Знаете, когда страшно проявляться, заявлять о своих новых начинаниях в ожидании неодобрительной реакции со стороны близких?
Где-то там глубже может быть страх потерять эти взаимоотношения или что нас исключат из привычного круга общения.
Мне пришла утешительная мысль, которая может помочь справиться с этими переживан…
Правда лишь пару фотографий из 50+ выдают меня, как психолога.
И то, только для тех, кто знаком с Ильёй Латыповым, Верой Дементьевой и Ольгой Миллер))
А этот год был со стабильной практикой от 10 консультаций в неделю, а за последние 4 месяца от 15.
📊 Немного статистики:
Провёл
Более 500 индивидуальных консультаций
8 групповых
23 встречи как тренер на программе провокативной психотерапии
1 теоретический модуль как…
Поздравляю Вас с новым годом!
Подсмотрел у коллеги такое полезное занятие, сделать коллаж по каждому месяцу прошедшего года и 31 декабря засел на несколько часов, хотя я не любитель подобных занятий.
Получился очень насыщенный на мероприятия год, всегда так хотел пожить.
Спасибо себе, что в декабре 2021 года начал свою личную терапию, которую продолжаю до сих пор.
На пятый год становятся видны последствия такого …
Первый набор в провокативную психологическую группу.(онлайн)
Малая группа до 12 человек. С 20:00 до 22:00, длительность: 1ч 45 минут (±15 минут), 12 встреч.
Группа – это возможность решить свой запрос, проработать его через чувства и эмоции других участников и увидеть провокативку вживую. Цена 12000 р. Есть возможность разбить на три платежа.
Даты проведения: 02.11, 09.11, 16.11, 23.11, 30.11, 07.12, 14.12, 21.12,…
❤🔥5🔥5❤1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @vavel_andrei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Можете ли подробно объяснить что такое извинение и зачем оно надо?
Да, сейчас объясню в комментариях27%
Не жмоться и поделись тем, что рассказал клиенту91%
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2025 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌗Путь психолога | Вавель Андрей” (@vavel_andrei), 183 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vavel_andrei.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.