Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Vangelo e Commento

@vangeloecommento

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry

705subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001277393263
TypeChannel
Username@vangeloecommento
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vangeloecommento

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Epicoco/22791 Aug 2026, 05:06 UTC@vangeloecommento/4946 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 06:37 UTC1.001.5 hours
@Epicoco/22835 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC@vangeloecommento/4950 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC1.0017 minutes
@Epicoco/22813 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC@vangeloecommento/4948 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 06:25 UTC1.0082 minutes
@Epicoco/227124 Jul 2026, 05:05 UTC@vangeloecommento/4936 · this entry24 Jul 2026, 06:13 UTC1.0067 minutes
@Epicoco/227730 Jul 2026, 05:07 UTC@vangeloecommento/4942 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 05:53 UTC1.0046 minutes
@Epicoco/226922 Jul 2026, 05:05 UTC@vangeloecommento/4934 · this entry22 Jul 2026, 06:32 UTC1.0086 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Epicoco9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9986 minutes@Epicoco (90)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 9 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @Epicoco. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7057077066 Aug 2026, 23:47 — 707 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 22:10 — 705 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:477 Aug 2026, 22:10
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 705–707 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 22:10705-2
6 Aug 2026, 23:47707first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.8%
avg views ÷ 705 subscribers
Avg views / post
154
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,079
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC85 viewsread 6 August 2026

Vangelo di Giovedì 6 Agosto Dal Vangelo secondo Matteo Mt 17,1-9 In quel tempo, Gesù prese con sé Pietro, Giacomo e Giovanni suo fratello e li condusse in disparte, su un alto monte. E fu trasfigurato davanti a loro: il suo volto brillò come il sole e le sue vesti divennero candide come la luce. Ed ecco apparvero loro Mosè ed Elia, che conversavano con lui. Prendendo la parola, Pietro disse a Gesù: «Signore, è bell

6 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC86 viewsread 6 August 2026

La Trasfigurazione del Signore è uno di quei momenti del Vangelo che non dovremmo mai dimenticare. Gesù conduce con sé Pietro, Giacomo e Giovanni sul monte e dona loro un'esperienza così intensa da imprimersi per sempre nella loro memoria. Non è un premio, è una preparazione. Quella luce li sosterrà quando arriverà il tempo del buio. Anche nella nostra vita il Signore ci dona delle trasfigurazioni. Non sempre sono ev

5 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC105 viewsread 6 August 2026

Vangelo di Mercoledì 5 Agosto Dal Vangelo secondo Matteo Mt 15,21-28 In quel tempo, Gesù si ritirò verso la zona di Tiro e di Sidòne. Ed ecco, una donna cananea, che veniva da quella regione, si mise a gridare: «Pietà di me, Signore, figlio di Davide! Mia figlia è molto tormentata da un demonio». Ma egli non le rivolse neppure una parola. Allora i suoi discepoli gli si avvicinarono e lo implorarono: «Esaudiscila, p

5 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC131 viewsread 6 August 2026

La pagina del Vangelo di oggi ci mette davanti a uno degli episodi più imbarazzanti e, a prima vista, più difficili da comprendere nel ministero di Gesù. Una donna cananea implora Gesù: «Pietà di me, Signore, figlio di Davide. Mia figlia è crudelmente tormentata da un demonio». Gesù non le rivolge neppure una parola. Il suo silenzio ci mette a disagio. Perché sembra ignorarla? Perché sembra respingerla? Se ci fermass

3 Aug 2026, 06:25 UTC144 viewsread 6 August 2026

Tante cose colpiscono nella pagina del Vangelo di oggi. Forse la prima è un particolare che rischiamo di dare per scontato: Gesù sale sul monte, da solo, a pregare. È un dettaglio che ci rivela il cuore della sua vita. Gesù non cerca il Padre soltanto quando ha bisogno di una risposta o di un aiuto. La sua preghiera è anzitutto una relazione d'amore. Chi ama non frequenta una persona solo nei momenti di necessità. La

3 Aug 2026, 06:24 UTC123 viewsread 6 August 2026

Dal Vangelo secondo Matteo Mt 14,22-36 [Dopo che la folla ebbe mangiato], subito Gesù costrinse i discepoli a salire sulla barca e a precederlo sull'altra riva, finché non avesse congedato la folla. Congedata la folla, salì sul monte, in disparte, a pregare. Venuta la sera, egli se ne stava lassù, da solo. La barca intanto distava già molte miglia da terra ed era agitata dalle onde: il vento infatti era contrario. S

1 Aug 2026, 06:37 UTC128 viewsread 6 August 2026

Vangelo di Sabato 1 Agosto Dal Vangelo secondo Matteo Mt 14,1-12 In quel tempo al tetrarca Erode giunse notizia della fama di Gesù. Egli disse ai suoi cortigiani: «Costui è Giovanni il Battista. È risorto dai morti e per questo ha il potere di fare prodigi!». Erode infatti aveva arrestato Giovanni e lo aveva fatto incatenare e gettare in prigione a causa di Erodìade, moglie di suo fratello Filippo. Giovanni infatti

1 Aug 2026, 06:37 UTC166 viewsread 6 August 2026

L'antefatto della morte di Giovanni Battista, che leggiamo nella pagina del Vangelo di oggi, non è semplicemente un episodio di cronaca nera che riguarda Erode e il martirio di Giovanni. È una storia che ci riguarda molto più da vicino di quanto immaginiamo, perché ci mostra la fine che può fare una persona quando perde progressivamente il dominio di sé. Erode è certamente un uomo potente, ma proprio il Vangelo ci mo

31 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC161 viewsread 6 August 2026

«Da dove mai viene a costui questa sapienza e questi prodigi? Non è egli il figlio del carpentiere?». Le parole dei compaesani di Gesù raccontano uno dei più grandi ostacoli che incontriamo nelle nostre relazioni: il pregiudizio. Pensiamo di conoscere una persona semplicemente perché conosciamo la sua storia, la sua famiglia, il suo passato. E così ciò che sappiamo di lei diventa una gabbia che ci impedisce di vedere

31 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC119 viewsread 6 August 2026

Vangelo di Venerdì 31 Luglio Dal Vangelo secondo Matteo Mt 13,54-58 In quel tempo Gesù, venuto nella sua patria, insegnava nella loro sinagoga e la gente rimaneva stupita e diceva: «Da dove gli vengono questa sapienza e i prodigi? Non è costui il figlio del falegname? E sua madre, non si chiama Maria? E i suoi fratelli, Giacomo, Giuseppe, Simone e Giuda? E le sue sorelle, non stanno tutte da noi? Da dove gli vengon

30 Jul 2026, 05:53 UTC160 viewsread 6 August 2026

«Il Regno dei cieli è simile anche a una rete gettata nel mare, che raccoglie ogni genere di pesci». È suggestiva questa immagine che Gesù usa nel Vangelo di oggi. Una rete, quando viene gettata, raccoglie tutto. Non sceglie prima che cosa prendere, non fa distinzioni, non esclude nessuno. Solo alla fine ciò che è stato raccolto viene separato. C'è una buona notizia nascosta in questa immagine: nessuno deve sentirsi

30 Jul 2026, 05:53 UTC129 viewsread 6 August 2026

Vangelo di Giovedì 30 Luglio Dal Vangelo secondo Matteo Mt 13,47-53 In quel tempo Gesù disse ai suoi discepoli: «Ancora, il regno dei cieli è simile a una rete gettata nel mare, che raccoglie ogni genere di pesci. Quando è piena, i pescatori la tirano a riva, si mettono a sedere, raccolgono i pesci buoni nei canestri e buttano via i cattivi. Così sarà alla fine del mondo. Verranno gli angeli e separeranno i cattivi

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vangeloecommento. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vangelo e Commento” (@vangeloecommento), 705 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vangeloecommento.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.