Channel
@Epicoco
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,939subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001400072836 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Epicoco |
| Created | Between 1 June 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Epicoco |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @Epicoco/2279 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 05:06 UTC | @vangeloecommento/49461 Aug 2026, 06:37 UTC | 1.00 | 1.5 hours |
| @Epicoco/2283 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC | @vangeloecommento/49505 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC | 1.00 | 17 minutes |
| @Epicoco/2281 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC | @vangeloecommento/49483 Aug 2026, 06:25 UTC | 1.00 | 82 minutes |
| @Epicoco/2271 · this entry24 Jul 2026, 05:05 UTC | @vangeloecommento/493624 Jul 2026, 06:13 UTC | 1.00 | 67 minutes |
| @Epicoco/2277 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 05:07 UTC | @vangeloecommento/494230 Jul 2026, 05:53 UTC | 1.00 | 46 minutes |
| @Epicoco/2269 · this entry22 Jul 2026, 05:05 UTC | @vangeloecommento/493422 Jul 2026, 06:32 UTC | 1.00 | 86 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @vangeloecommento | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 86 minutes | this entry (9–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @Epicoco — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 1,939 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 1,939 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 16,965 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
« Qual vantaggio infatti avrà l'uomo se guadagnerà il mondo intero, e poi perderà la propria anima? O che cosa l'uomo potrà dare in cambio della propria anima?». Passiamo gran parte della nostra esistenza cercando di conquistare qualcosa: successo, sicurezza, prestigio, consenso, beni materiali. Ma Gesù ci costringe a fermarci e a domandarci quale sia il prezzo di queste conquiste. Esiste infatti un successo che può …
La Trasfigurazione del Signore è uno di quei momenti del Vangelo che non dovremmo mai dimenticare. Gesù conduce con sé Pietro, Giacomo e Giovanni sul monte e dona loro un'esperienza così intensa da imprimersi per sempre nella loro memoria. Non è un premio , è una preparazione. Quella luce li sosterrà quando arriverà il tempo del buio. Anche nella nostra vita il Signore ci dona delle trasfigurazioni. Non sempre sono e…
La pagina del Vangelo di oggi ci mette davanti a uno degli episodi più imbarazzanti e, a prima vista, più difficili da comprendere nel ministero di Gesù. Una donna cananea implora Gesù: «Pietà di me, Signore, figlio di Davide. Mia figlia è crudelmente tormentata da un demonio». Gesù non le rivolge neppure una parola. Il suo silenzio ci mette a disagio. Perché sembra ignorarla? Perché sembra respingerla? Se ci fermass…
«Lasciateli! Sono ciechi e guide di ciechi». Sono parole molto dure quelle che Gesù pronuncia nel Vangelo di oggi. Ma non sono rivolte contro la fragilità delle persone. Sono rivolte contro un modo sbagliato di vivere la responsabilità. Una guida che non vede non soltanto smarrisce la strada, ma trascina fuori strada anche coloro che si fidano di lei. Tutto nasce da un'affermazione che, in fondo, è molto semplice: «N…
Tante cose colpiscono nella pagina del Vangelo di oggi. Forse la prima è un particolare che rischiamo di dare per scontato: Gesù sale sul monte, da solo, a pregare. È un dettaglio che ci rivela il cuore della sua vita. Gesù non cerca il Padre soltanto quando ha bisogno di una risposta o di un aiuto. La sua preghiera è anzitutto una relazione d'amore. Chi ama non frequenta una persona solo nei momenti di necessità. La…
https://youtu.be/SupQCulnS_U?is=F9Tt25M1W6dD5SNa
L'antefatto della morte di Giovanni Battista, che leggiamo nella pagina del Vangelo di oggi, non è semplicemente un episodio di cronaca nera che riguarda Erode e il martirio di Giovanni. È una storia che ci riguarda molto più da vicino di quanto immaginiamo, perché ci mostra la fine che può fare una persona quando perde progressivamente il dominio di sé. Erode è certamente un uomo potente, ma proprio il Vangelo ci mo…
«Da dove mai viene a costui questa sapienza e questi prodigi? Non è egli il figlio del carpentiere?». Le parole dei compaesani di Gesù raccontano uno dei più grandi ostacoli che incontriamo nelle nostre relazioni: il pregiudizio. Pensiamo di conoscere una persona semplicemente perché conosciamo la sua storia, la sua famiglia, il suo passato. E così ciò che sappiamo di lei diventa una gabbia che ci impedisce di vedere…
«Il Regno dei cieli è simile anche a una rete gettata nel mare, che raccoglie ogni genere di pesci». È suggestiva questa immagine che Gesù usa nel Vangelo di oggi. Una rete, quando viene gettata, raccoglie tutto. Non sceglie prima che cosa prendere, non fa distinzioni, non esclude nessuno. Solo alla fine ciò che è stato raccolto viene separato. C'è una buona notizia nascosta in questa immagine: nessuno deve sentirsi …
La festa di oggi è, in un certo senso, la festa dell'amicizia, perché celebriamo Marta, Maria e Lazzaro, gli amici di Gesù. La loro casa di Betania è uno dei pochi luoghi del Vangelo in cui vediamo Gesù vivere la bellezza di una relazione familiare, gratuita, intima. Gesù aveva bisogno anche di amici. Ma la cosa più interessante della loro storia è che l'amicizia con Cristo non li lascia uguali a come li ha trovati. …
«Colui che semina il buon seme è il Figlio dell'uomo. Il campo è il mondo. Il seme buono sono i figli del Regno; la zizzania sono i figli del Maligno». La spiegazione che Gesù dà della parabola nel Vangelo di oggi ci pone davanti a una domanda che forse molto spesso evitiamo: a chi apparteniamo? Potrebbe sembrare una domanda astratta, ma in realtà riguarda la concretezza di ogni nostra giornata. Perché continuamente …
«Il Regno dei cieli è simile a un granello di senape» e ancora «è simile al lievito». Sono due immagini semplicissime che Gesù usa nel Vangelo di oggi per raccontarci la grande dinamica dell'interiorità e della vita spirituale. Entrambe ci insegnano due cose di cui abbiamo tremendamente bisogno: la piccolezza di chi sa affidarsi e la pazienza di chi accetta la gradualità della vita. Noi siamo abituati a pensare che c…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Epicoco. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 220,240 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Omelie Epicoco” (@Epicoco), 1,939 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Epicoco.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.