Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Валюха и ямы

Channel

Валюха и ямы

@valuha_i_yamy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

292subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001839240730
TypeChannel
Username@valuha_i_yamy
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/valuha_i_yamy

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

279292285.57 August 2026 — 279 subscribers7 August 2026 — 279 subscribers14 August 2026 — 290 subscribers20 August 2026 — 288 subscribers28 August 2026 — 289 subscribers6 September 2026 — 288 subscribers14 September 2026 — 292 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 38 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 277–294 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 15:00292+4
6 Sept 2026, 08:40288-1
28 Aug 2026, 07:42289+1
20 Aug 2026, 13:53288-2
14 Aug 2026, 13:24290+11
7 Aug 2026, 15:15279no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:45279first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 14 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

302 reactions across 17 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10936.1%
8829.1%
😁289.27%
👍123.97%
🥰113.64%
❤‍🔥103.31%
😍92.98%
🤩92.98%
💅41.32%
30.993%
🌚30.993%
🐳30.993%
👏30.993%
🏆20.662%
🕊20.662%
🤔20.662%
🤣20.662%
10.331%
😈10.331%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 302 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 19:30 UTC103 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Иногда коллеги ездят на архитектурные шурфы и привозят разные интересности. Вот недавно была записка с интересным вопросом. Мы аж ее сфотографировали, просто так, для себя. Несправедливость и мухлеж!

😁73🤔2

25 Jul 2026, 06:46 UTC187 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Этим летом меня не отправляют в поля. Так получилось, что приоритетнее сейчас наш необъятный отчет по кладбищу Томашева Колка, и пока не появилось более приоритетного раскопа, на который я должна была бы поехать. Поэтому я в режиме марафона просматриваю фотографии, проверяю корректность чертежа каждого захоронения по этой фотографии, вношу правки, отдаю на написание текстов, просматриваю тексты, читаю описания наход

15🥰8🔥5👏1

14 Jul 2026, 13:18 UTC493 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В субботу оказалось, что хорошая компания — тоже важный элемент в поклейке горшочков. Это ласточки прилетали на экспериментальный археологический пикник. Получилось сумбурно, но весело. Еще соберемся)

🔥17😍98🤩3

30 Jun 2026, 18:24 UTC392 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Ключевой элемент в поклейке ископаемого горшка

  1. Удача45%
  2. Прямые руки66%
  3. Жидкие гвозди20%
  4. Свой вариант в комменты0%

The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

😁76🔥2

30 Jun 2026, 18:22 UTC296 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Недавно клеила развал горшочка XIII-XIV века из Нижнего Новгорода. Вот, хвастаюсь 🙂

🔥209

20 Jun 2026, 19:59 UTC378 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На лекции пообещала ссылку на видео с грустным сотрудником Азовского музея и кладом стеклянных перстней) Вот

😁96👍3🌚2

20 Jun 2026, 19:55 UTC268 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @leva_studioPhoto

Теперь мы знаем из чего состоят стеклянные бусины) Спасибо Валентине Неупокоевой @valuha_i_yamy за лекцию ☺️

❤‍🔥103🐳3

8 Jun 2026, 11:13 UTC265 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @leva_studioPhoto

Драгоценное стекло: что носили модницы средневековья ✨ На раскопках древнерусских археологических памятников одна из постоянных находок — фрагменты стеклянных браслетов. 👀 Их носили так много, что хотя бы один кусочек попадает в каждый раскоп. Как стали делать стеклянные украшения и когда они вышли из моды расскажет Валентина Неупокоева. 👉🏻19 июня ( пятница) начало в 18:30 👉🏻Вход 300р 👉🏻 ул. Куйбышева 23, 3 этаж, 3

🔥102👍2🕊1

27 May 2026, 10:27 UTC310 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я там буду показывать первого пензенского археолога. Потому что это не археолог вовсе, а археологиня!

🔥132🥰2

27 May 2026, 10:23 UTC269 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @lastochki_penzaPhoto

В последний день весны тсж «ласточки» познакомит вас с удивительным женщинами, которые творили и совершали важные открытия. Все они были связаны с Пензой - поэтому мы считаем необходимым не только назвать их имена, но и сделать их более видимыми в истории города. Все они следовали за своей мечтой наперекор ограничениям и стереотипам. Отстаивали себя и поддерживали других женщин. Были громкими, заметными и свободными

6🔥4🏆1

25 May 2026, 15:34 UTC233 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я не забыла! Просто два числа из комментариев попали на одну длиннющую статью и я не могу найти время ее вдумчиво прочитать😁

😁5🌚1

25 May 2026, 15:33 UTC191 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Меня сегодня на местном телевидении показывали!

7🤣1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @valuha_i_yamy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jun 2026, 18:24 UTCAnonymous Poll44 voters

Ключевой элемент в поклейке ископаемого горшка

  1. Удача45%
  2. Прямые руки66%
  3. Жидкие гвозди20%
  4. Свой вариант в комменты0%

The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Валюха и ямы” (@valuha_i_yamy), 292 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valuha_i_yamy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.