Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Valentov Types Letters

Channel

Valentov Types Letters

@valentovtypes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

172subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003819390976
TypeChannel
Username@valentovtypes
DescriptionПро ИИ агентов и управление роевыми проектами. https://arcanada.one — экосистема ИИ агентов https://datarim.club — фреймворк управления проектами с ИИ агентами
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/valentovtypes

Growth

1727 Aug 2026, 19:40 — 172 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 14:46 — 172 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:408 Aug 2026, 14:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 171–173 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 14:46172no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:40172first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.5%
avg views ÷ 172 subscribers
Avg views / post
62.8
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held17 (25 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,068
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
150
Videos
14
Links
69

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍758.3%
216.7%
🤣216.7%
😁18.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC42 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нейрослоп: как ИИ пишет тексты за меня Сейчас почти все тексты я пишу с помощью ИИ. Я наговариваю свои мысли в диктофон, запись транскрибируется, а затем прошу ИИ оформить сказанное: исправить орфографию и пунктуацию, убрать речевые повторы, привести в порядок стилистику и сделать текст более связным. Говорю и пишу я на том языке, на котором мне удобно думать, — на родном. А затем с помощью ИИ перевожу текст на др

👍1

4 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC45 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Gpt-5.6-luna MAX — 23 задачи и минус недельный лимит за 2.5 суток. Из них много задач по фронтенду — традиционно расходные по токенам задачи. Но в целом (субъективно) модель показалась сильно медленной, очень много итераций для не очень сложных и хорошо документированных задач. Sol xHigh оставил существенно лучшие впечатления у меня, хоть и сгорал быстрее.

👍1

3 Aug 2026, 22:12 UTC57 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Если на вашей вечеринке вы не генерируете картинки с такими же длинными промптами, даже не думайте меня туда приглашать 😀 precise rounded rectangles, thin grey arrows and a clean sans serif font like Inter or Helvetica. Use a muted blue grey palette. English text only, 16 by 9 aspect ratio. Title at top: 'Knowledge Contract Lifecycle'. Show a central horizontal flow with four main stages in rounded boxes connected b

👍1

1 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC67 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Conversation to Markdown вышло в Chrome Web Store Расширение сохраняет диалог с ChatGPT в Markdown-файл. Теперь ставится из магазина в один клик, обновления приходят сами. Что изменилось к этой версии: — Длинные диалоги выгружаются целиком. Раньше на разговоре в несколько сотен сообщений сбор обрывался таймаутом. — Картинки скачиваются рядом с текстом, ссылки в Markdown ведут на локальные файлы — документ читается

👍1

1 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC58 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

DeepSeek: с этим надо что-то делать! Эти 2 миллиарда токенов за месяц — перебор. В основном они ушли на создание смыслов и артефактов для этапов задач: требований к проектированию, планов задач, отчётов по код-ревью и проверке соответствия. Мой Coworker (на хуках) поручает это модели DeepSeek Pro + Reasoning, чтобы снять нагрузку с основных моделей в Claude Code и Codex. Выходит довольно дорого. В смысле, я рассч

👍1

1 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC58 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Опубликовали наконец-то мой плагин Chrome для копирования чатов из ChatGPT Voice. Сам пользуюсь и вам отдаю. Если полезно, наставьте пожалуйста звёздочек 🙏🏻 https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/conversation-to-markdown/jhnhkmnignbhmcjbhoihdbjhjfljpili

1👍1

1 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC49 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Переключил R&D-агентов на Codex GPT-5.6-Luna Max. Так посоветовал Сергей Пименов. Говорит, модель уже на уровне Sol, но потребляет заметно меньше токенов. Как раз сегодня Codex снова обнулил лимиты. Проверим, насколько быстро получится выжечь их на этот раз. Написал в супервизоре агентов: «Используй в оркестраторе DEVS TMUX модель GPT-5.6-Luna Max». Агенты уже переключились. Теперь ждём вечернюю сводку по задачам

30 Jul 2026, 23:18 UTC56 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Codex сбросил лимиты, ура! Вчера сбросил, а сегодня уже недельные лимиты закончились. $200 в месяц, Карл! Очень щедро, спасибо! Пока мы общались с коллегами на круглом столе в Стартап-Котиках, агенты молотили в 7 сессий проекты Арканады. 6 на Клоде, и только 1 на Кодексе. Как вы работаете с ним (с Кодексом)? Может есть секрет какой-то? Поделитесь пожалуйста, очень прошу! =)

1

30 Jul 2026, 15:40 UTC54 viewsread 8 August 2026

Друзья, через 20 минут начинаем круглый стол по First-AI. Присоединяйтесь!

30 Jul 2026, 15:40 UTC65 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🐈 Стартап-Котики! Напоминаю: сегодня в 17:00 (Лондон) — Круглый стол «AI-First: что теперь может построить один человек». 🎙 Гость — Павел Валентов (@PavelValentov). Будет практический разговор без воды: AI, стартапы, разработка и реальные кейсы. 👉 https://us06web.zoom.us/j/86805785672?pwd=No7kTbKKeNIwvfr5uG4jVwhSQV7n2f.1 До встречи! 🚀

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @valentovtypes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Valentov Types Letters” (@valentovtypes), 172 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/valentovtypes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.