Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tell me how to startup (c) Kryak meetings

Channel

Tell me how to startup (c) Kryak meetings

@kryak_startup

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

503subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001444806010
TypeChannel
Username@kryak_startup
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kryak_startup

Growth

4895034966 August 2026 — 489 subscribers6 August 2026 — 489 subscribers14 August 2026 — 503 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 487–505 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:26503+14
6 Aug 2026, 18:48489no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:18489first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.1%
avg views ÷ 503 subscribers
Avg views / post
116
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held16 (26 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total1,859
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

24 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1250.0%
312.5%
👍312.5%
🦄312.5%
💯14.17%
🤝14.17%
🤯14.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC59 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

синдром вареной лягушки - привет https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_frog

3 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC63 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Многопоточные AI агенты против race condition или как мой агент написал скрипт ab_test_bus.py, который имитирует 20 агентов, одновременно пытающихся прочитать файл task.md, найти в нем конкретную строчку, изменить статус на [x] и сохранить файл обратно. Именно это постоянно делают агенты в Antigravity.

👍1

3 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC60 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @savyuk_mentor

Одиночество СЕО Чем успешнее и больше бизнес, тем сильнее эффект, который я называю “Одиночество СЕО”. Так бывает не всегда, но часто. Ты этого не замечаешь? Да ладно, просто загрузка 16х7 не оставляет времени подумать о себе. Посмотри на этот список: ➖Одиночество решений Ты принимаешь ключевые решения в одиночку. К акционерам не набегаешься, на подчинённых не переложишь. ➖Одиночество ответственности У победы 100

💯1

1 Aug 2026, 21:11 UTC85 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ouroboros занят - думаю над неймингом

30 Jul 2026, 23:36 UTC100 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

спонтанные бонусы подъехали - или как это в Diablo 2 -> бонусы от сэтовых вещей

30 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC188 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🐈 В «Стартап-Котиках» проводим Круглый стол: AI-First: что теперь может построить один человек Ещё недавно для запуска сложного цифрового продукта требовалась целая команда. Сегодня один человек, вооружённый AI-инструментами и правильно выстроенной системой, способен пройти путь от идеи до работающего продукта. Поговорим о том: — что на практике означает AI-first;— какие задачи уже можно передать AI-агентам;— как

3🤝1

29 Jul 2026, 13:52 UTC102 viewsread 6 August 2026

"некая" оптимизация случайно съела 400GB моего диска на макбуке 🤔😂 за счет "раздутых" шагов в агентах, которые в качестве логов и бэкапов на сессию выделяли по 10MB, а запросов этих в минуту сотни/тысячи и не ваакумировались потом. Чуть не забил всю память/место ноута пустым пространством be carefull

27 Jul 2026, 22:54 UTC110 viewsread 6 August 2026

Комментарии и вопросы в self-evolve: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/kirr-simakovs-364a69190_what-happens-when-a-single-ai-coding-session-activity-7487589510726422530-wHat Вот что система сразу накидала через короткий промпт мой: *** на пост <URL> и комментарии к нему от <XXX>: Распиши ответы на каждый из комментариев на английском и подумай заодно, могут ли эти вопросы помочь нам улучшить нашу экосистему / оркестрат

27 Jul 2026, 17:42 UTC237 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

♾️ [SOTA 2026 Founder Mode] Архитектура "Бесконечного Чата" на 100,000+ Сообщений в Google Antigravity 2 (Infinite Chat Architecture Scaling) Как сделать так, чтобы один диалог в IDE мог длиться месяцами, вырастать до 100,000+ сообщений, но при этом IDE не зависала, память V8 не вылетала, а контекстное окно оставалось мгновенным и дешевым? Поверхностный разбор инженерии под капотом нашей системы: 1️⃣ Predictive Ro

🔥3

27 Jul 2026, 17:28 UTC191 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🛠 Как идет работа/дебаг теперь 🍆 📐 [SOTA 2026 Founder Mode] Категориально-Алгебраический Протокол AI-Агента (Categorical Algebra Explained) Объяснение алгебраической математической структуры нашей автономной агентской системы: 1️⃣ Monoid (associative_state_merge): Ассоциативное объединение состояний памяти. Позволяет сливать контексты сессий в любом порядке (A + B) + C = A + (B + C) с нейтральным элементом (пустая

👍2🦄2

27 Jul 2026, 13:22 UTC103 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Co-algebra in AI loop engineering mathematically dualizes standard data structures to govern infinite streams, state transitions, and agent observation-action cycles. It handles system behavior and corecursion (unfolding data like an agent loop) rather than recursion (folding data like standard inputs). 1️⃣ Core Concepts of Co-algebra in AI Loops - Anamorphisms (Unfolding): Generates infinite execution streams or ac

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @kryak_startup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 333,809 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tell me how to startup (c) Kryak meetings” (@kryak_startup), 503 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kryak_startup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.