Channel
@vajnodelitsya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
66subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001428695222 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vajnodelitsya |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vajnodelitsya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 66 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 67 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 67 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 7 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (7 January 2026 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 25 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 01:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Цымбаленко Н. Буллинг. Как остановить травлю ребенка https://school108.centerstart.ru/sites/school108.centerstart.ru/files/tmp/doc/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BA%20%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C%20%D0%91%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B3.pdf
Signed Nastasya Andriadze
https://saosa.ru/checklist-gurus-cult
Signed Nastasya Andriadze
И этот дефект, в отличие от того примера, что я только что описала — всегда спрятан. И всегда его обнаружение — ужасает и вызывает панику либо гнев. Соответственно, терапевт раз за разом встает перед выбором — то ли гладить клиента, одобряя и опровергая его внутренний ужас (и примерно так представляют себе порой терапию нарциссического расстройства по Кохуту), то ли раз за разом сталкивать клиента с великим и ужасным…
Signed Nastasya Andriadze
Токсический стыд Работа с токсическим стыдом нередко воспринимается терапевтами, как вкачивание поддержки и одобрения в бездонный колодец самопорицания и ощущения собственной плохости. Со смутной надеждой, что если достаточно долго отражать клиенту, что он не так уж плох, то когда-нибудь этот колодец все же заполнится водой адекватной самооценки. Но при таком подходе сразу возникает путаница, и клиент с терапевтом …
Signed Nastasya Andriadze
ФБ Владимир Синигур Итак, дорогие мои друзья. Сейчас будет минутка психического здоровья и ментальной гигиены. Обычно я не комментирую никакие социальные процессы здесь, если они не касаются темы психического здоровья. Вот сейчас, похоже, наступает момент, когда наше с вами психическое здоровье может оказаться под информационным ударом подобно тому, как это было четыре года назад. Вакханалия в соцсетях, море против…
Signed Nastasya Andriadze
фб Анна Забелоцкая Про стыд и привязанность. Сейчас читаю книгу Нейробиология привязанности Луиса Козалино. В книге приведены доказательства того, что стыд, возникающий в конце первого года жизни , вследствие того, что родитель маркирует какое - то поведение ребёнка как нежелательное , на уровне психофизиологии блокирует формирование надёжной привязанности. Интересно, что младенец ещё не понимает, что хорошо, а что…
Signed Nastasya Andriadze
Этические аспекты профессиональной самопрезентации психологов в социальных сетях в контексте проблемы нарциссизма Иванова М.С., Холмогорова А.Б. (Москва, Россия)
Signed Nastasya Andriadze
The Hidden Grief Behind Burnout, Self-Sabotage and Survival Mode - Revive & Thrive - Managing Stress and Burnout | Podcast on Spotify https://open.spotify.com/episode/6nTGzVDVEoCWGAhvVzdgW8
Signed Nastasya Andriadze
О работе с проживанием утраты в гештальт-терапии Конспект двух лекций – Александра Моховикова и Олега Немиринского Варя Шетцель https://telegra.ph/O-rabote-s-prozhivaniem-utraty-v-geshtalt-terapii-05-11?fbclid=Iwb21leARuzQRjbGNrBG7M8mV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHt9P7e8iakxJIra-sCQKIM52VZYYGBZVFapZ4NDePa0q6KBm7Ps7WZNH2fNj_aem__irlX3CvV8WrogIfPpMtHA
Signed Nastasya Andriadze
Анастасия Жичкина кПТСР: ВОССТАНАВЛИВАЯ СВЯЗИ Что чувствует человек с комплексной травмой, и как это проявляется в отношениях и в терапии
Signed Nastasya Andriadze
Вы советуетесь с чатом GPT по вопросами психологического характера? У меня к вам подоспели новости из мира психиатрии. The Lancet в 2026 году официально классифицировал роли искусственного интеллекта в психотических расстройствах — и типология получилась неожиданно стройной. Первая роль: катализатор. ИИ способен спровоцировать психоз у человека, у которого раньше не было никаких симптомов. Редкий случай, и авторы са…
Signed Nastasya Andriadze
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Nastasya Andriadze
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @vajnodelitsya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 913,265 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ВАЖНО ДЕЛИТЬСЯ” (@vajnodelitsya), 66 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vajnodelitsya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.