5 measurements spanning 9 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,626–1,633 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 15:07
1,632
+1
13 Aug 2026, 09:14
1,631
+2
10 Aug 2026, 17:18
1,629
+2
7 Aug 2026, 21:03
1,627
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:48
1,627
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
32.6%
avg views ÷ 1,632 subscribers
Avg views / post
532
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (2 November 2025 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
1,063
Reactions total
14
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
137 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
81
59.1%
👍
54
39.4%
👎
2
1.46%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 November 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#رویداد_رایگان
🎨 فرکانس تجربه | آشنایی با UI/UX، کاربردها و موقعیتهای شغلی
پشت هر محصول دیجیتال موفق، ساعتها تحقیق، شناخت رفتار کاربران، طراحی و حل مسئله وجود داره.
دنیایی که با UI/UX شناخته میشه!
اگه دوست داری بدونی:
🔹که UI و UX دقیقا چه تفاوتی با هم دارن؟
🔹 برای ورود به این حوزه به چه مهارتهایی نیاز داری؟
🔹 بازار کار، درآمد و فرصتهای شغلی UI/UX چطوره؟
تو ایونت «فرکانس تجربه» تلاش میکنیم با استفاده از تجر…
آروین ترکاشوند یک پلاگین کاربردی برای Figma ساخته که به شما این امکان را میدهد تا همزمان با طراحی، UX Writing محصول را انجام دهید.
این پلاگین کمک میکند بدون اینکه از محیط Figma خارج شوید، متنهای تجربۀ کاربری را برای بخشهای مختلف محصول بنویسید، مثل:
متن دکمهها (CTA)
پیامهای خطا (Error Messages)
فضاهای خالی (Empty State)
متنهای آنبوردینگ
فرمها
و بخشهای دیگر محصول
همچنین میتوانید متنهای نوشتهشدهی قبلی …
قراره یه وبینار در حوزهی یوایکسرایتینگ به همت یکی از دوستان و با تدریس من برگزار بشه...
من دارم به موضوعی که بتونه برای افراد زیادی مفید باشه فکر میکنم شما هم اگر ایدهای داشتین حتما با من درمیون بذارید...
مرسی!
حتما برایتان پیش آمده که بروید دنبال یک کار اداری و ببینید وقتی فرمی را که خیلی برایتان حیاتی است به کارمندی تحویل میدهید او همان طور فرم را میگیرد و بدون این که نگاهش کند شروع میکند به حرف زدن با همکارها و خوردن چای و... شما هم نگاه نگران را دوختهاید به فرم بیچاره که ببینید بالاخره چه بلایی سرش میآید و همزمان حس میکنید کسی اینجا کاری برایتان انجام نمیدهد.
در عوض اگر کارمند فرم را از شما بگیرد و بعد پشت سیس…
طراحی محصول باید طوری باشد که خطا به حداقل میزان ممکن برسد، جوری که اصلا امکان خطا نباشد و اگر نشد خب میرویم سراغ نشانهها و متنها!
برای مثال اگر پریز برق را جوری میساختند که هر بار میخواستیم دو شاخه را وارد پریز کنیم ممکن بود دستمان هم وارد پریز شود، چهطور میخواستیم با پیغام خطا به مخاطب بگوییم احتمال برقگرفتگی وجود دارد؟
اصلا وقتی خطایی در این حد خطرناک و غیرقابل بازگشت است، پیغام خطا میتواند راهگشا باشد…
در یکی از سایتهای برگزاری دورهی آموزشی فرمی پر کردم و ذخیره را زدم و دیدم هیچ اتفاقی نیفتاد، یعنی توی همان صفحه مانده بودم بدون این که اتفاقی بیفتد، این شد که چندین بار دیگر روی دکمهی ذخیره زدم و باز انگار نه انگار!
از طرفی هم میترسیدم صفحه را ترک کنم و تمام اطلاعاتی که با خون دل پر کرده بودم بپرد ولی بالاخره بعد از چند دقیقه خسته شدم، صفحه را بستم و مجدد باز کردم و دیدم اطلاعاتم ذخیره شده، بدون این که یک کلمه ب…
وقتی یوایکسرایتینگ اشتباه ارزش کار را پایین میآورد
مکتبخونه در توضیح دورهی نامگذاری برند من نوشته: مقدماتی!
که این اشتباه است!!!
این را از این جهت نوشته که من توضیح دادهام این دوره نیاز به پیشنیاز ندارد چون من هرچه لازم است میگویم اما وقتی مینویسد مقدماتی، انگار که دورهی پیشرفتهای هم در کار است در حالی که این دوره نه پیشنیازی لازم دارد نه قرار است یک مرحلهی بعد داشته باشد، اگر هم داشته باشد دیگر به شک…
مکتبخونه دورهی «نامگذاری برند» من را یکی دو هفته پیش منتشر کرد و این دوره در این مدت کوتاه ۸۳ دانشجو جذب کرد. (البته که من تا امروز این دوره را معرفی نکرده بودم به جز در پاسخ یک کامنت)
یک دلیل اصلیاش این است که در روزهای قطعی اینترنت و فعالیت نکردن برندها در سوشال بسیاری از بچههای کپیرایتر، کارشناس محتوا و... سعی کردند تمرکزشان را بگذارند روی آموزش دیدن تا از این انفعال خارج شوند. (گمانم این کاری بود که همه …
از لینکدین خانم farzaneh zaerrafiei
وقتی اینترنت قطع میشود، تیم طراحی شما چه میکند؟
وابستگی کامل به ابزارهای Cloud مثل Figma میتواند کار تیم را متوقف کند، اما Penpot، یک ابزار Open-Source و self-hosted، این مشکل را حل میکند.
با Penpot میتوانید پروژهها و Design System شرکت را روی سیستم شخصی یا سرور داخلی اجرا کنید و حتی بدون اینترنت، به فایلها دسترسی داشته باشید. این یعنی سرعت کار بالا، کنترل کامل دادهها و ام…
در مقابل مفهوم Advertising مفهومی داریم به اسم Subvertising به این معنی که از تبلیغ برای خراب کردن تبلیغ استفاده میکنید، سابورتایزینگ نوعی آنتیتبلیغ است که درواقع تبلیغ را هجو میکند.
سابور-تایزینگ کارکردهای مختلفی دارد، مثلا:
- افشای دروغ یا اغراق تبلیغاتی
- نقد مصرفگرایی
- برانگیختن تفکر انتقادی مخاطب
و اما کارکردهای مهم دیگرش اعتراض و آگاهیبخشی اجتماعی است!
یک نمونهی معروفش که احتمالا دیده باشید هجو شعار …
❤1
Signed صدیقه حسینی
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ux_writer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 173,812 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
امید امانی | Omid Amani @dr_amaniiiii · 93,975 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“یادداشتهای یک یوایکسرایتر” (@ux_writer), 1,632 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ux_writer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
