Channel
@GeneralEnglishPlan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
31,723subscribers
+67 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001342833893 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GeneralEnglishPlan |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GeneralEnglishPlan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 31,723 | -9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 31,732 | +9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 31,723 | +20 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:50 | 31,703 | +12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 31,691 | +13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:50 | 31,678 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 31,673 | +17 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 31,656 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:49 | 31,656 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (21 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 157,790 |
| Reactions total | 1,189 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,036 reactions across 24 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 898 | 86.7% | |
| 👍 | 138 | 13.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,189reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
حیفه واقعاً. استوریهای رایگان مرور لغات اینستاگرام رو از دست ندید. احتمالاً خیلی زود این رو به عنوان محصول قابل خریداری هم موجود کنیم اما تا ابد استوریهای رایگان براتون میمونن به شرطی که همت کنید و هر روز اونا رو چک کنید که چند تا لغت و گرامر براتون مرور شه. اینستاگرام ما برای دنبال کردن: 🌀 Instagram.com/generalenglish توی اینستا، هر از چندگاهی هم باکس باز میکنیم که چالش مطالعه زبان رو بگید و ما راهکار درست ر…
❤28👍3
#سوال_متداول تست اضافی بخوام بزنم چی کار کنم؟ من وقت بیشتری میتونم روی زبان بذارم، چی کار کنم؟ @GeneralEnglishPlan ویسها رو گوش بدین حتی با دور تند (2x)
❤24👍2
نتایج سه سال اخیر همین نظرسنجی رو در عکس بالا ببینید. نتایج ۱۰ سال بعد هم ببینید همین خواهد بود. مقایسه کنید با امسال. وقتی توی توصیهها میگم این موارد برای ما که ۱۷ سال از نوشتن کتاب و ارتباطمون با دانشجوها گذشته، دژاوو (خاطره) هست، حقیقته. این شما نیستید که استرس دارید من عقبم چی کار کنم.... خیلیا همین وضعیت رو دارن. مهم اینه که شروع کنین و وقفه نندازید. ۶ ماه هم بخونین، نتیجه نهایی عالی میشه. قول میدم بهتون.…
❤55👍9
Posted without readable text
❤67
هفته یازدهم از طرح مطالعاتی رایگان زبان #هفته11 ‼️ توجه: این برنامه شامل واژگان، گرامر و درک مطلب و در نهایت تستزنی کافی و مرور خواهد بود و تا پیش از کنکور دکتری و ارشد تمام خواهد شد. 🌀 تکلیف ➕ واژگان کلیه آزمونها: درس ۱۱ تا درس ۱۴ از ویرایش نُـهُــم جلد ۱ زبان زیر ذرهبین چاپ نگاه دانش (صفحه ۱۳۶ تا ۱۴۶) و مرور قبلیا با اِلـِوِنپلاس روز یازدهم تا چهاردهم از ویرایش هشتم جلد ۱ زبان زیر ذره بین چاپ نگاه دانش (صف…
❤18👍5
میدونستید اول هر هفته، ما یه باکس توی اینستاگراممون باز میکنیم و شما لغاتی که مشکل دارید رو اونجا میگید و در طول هفته ما انقدر از اون لغات پیشنهادی شما مثال مینویسیم توی استوریهای اینستاگرام که لغت ملکه ذهن شما بشه؟ حتماً حتماً اینستاگرام رو فالو کنید و به دوستان خودتون معرفی کنید: 🌀 instagram.com/generalenglish اینستاگرام ما با تیک آبی هست و با اسامی مشابه نباید اشتباه کنید. نمیدونم تو این سالها چند هزار لغ…
❤42👍5
📩 #کوئیز شماره ۱۰ از محتوای #هفته10 به همراه پاسخ تشریحی-تحلیلی @GeneralEnglishPlan ۳۴ سوال واژگان ۳۵ سوال گرامر (جدید) با گزینههای پایین بگید چند تا درست داشتید. سی و یا کمتر صحیح بین سی تا چهل صحیح بیش از چهل صحیح
❤17👍6
یه همچین دانشجوهای گل و پرتلاشی داریم ما 🌹👏 توی زبان به هرچیزی برسید، نتیجه تلاش خودتون بوده و بس. هرکی زحمت بکشه، حتماً مزدش رو میبره. من تازه با برنامه شما شروع کردم و توی هفته دومم از تاثیر کتاب خوب و برنامه فوق العادتون همینقدر بگم که منی که از زبان انگلیسی نفرت داشتم و هیچوقت سمتش نمیرفتم چون فکر میکردم خیلی سخته، انگلیسی الان شده برام یه درس شیرین و هر روز هر وقت از ژنتیک و بیوشیمی و سلولی خسته میشم میگم خب…
❤56👍3
#سوال_متداول ❓ من با برنامهتون میخونم ولی ... قبل از ادامه دادن، بیاید ببینیم اصلاً واقعاً با برنامه ما پیش میرید یا نه! برای اینکه بگیم با برنامه ما پیش میرید، لازمه که این شرایط رو داشته باشید: ۱. آزمون تعیین سطح داده باشید. ۲. بر اساس نتیجه آزمون، از هفته درست شروع کرده باشید. ۳. هرچیزی که توی برنامه هفته هست رو موبهمو اجرا کنید؛ مثلاً اینکه فقط واژگان بخونید و گرامر رو بذارید کنار، حساب نیست! ۴. ویدیوهای …
❤39👍8
#داستان شماره ۱۰ از لغات هفته ۱۰ مجموعه زبان زیر ذرهبین با برنامهریزی و پشتیبانی صد در صد رایگان مطالعه زبان از سطح صفر @GeneralEnglishPlan #هفته10 این داستان رو به صورت فایل صوتی (پادکست) گوش دهید: 🌀 کستباکس 🌀 اپل پادکست 🌀 اسپاتیفای @GeneralEnglishPlan
❤16👍4
این کتاب در حدی که خوندن این کتاب از خواندن کتاب های سری Oxford word skills که قبلا خونده بودم لذت بخش تر است. من سال ۹۷ کنکور دادم ، الان مهاجرت کردم استرالیا، و همچنان منبع اصلیم لغتم کتاب شماست. و حتی داستان هایی که بعد از هر هفته تو کانال میزاریدو میخونم و عجیب مرور میشه همه چی. امروز آزمون msrt بود بخش گرامر رو خیلی خوب پاسخ دادم واقعا تدریس و کتاب های شما بی نظیر هست . با این کتاب عالیشون و این برنامه های هف…
❤63👍7
برای گرامر این هفته، میتونین بخش قید از ویدئوی آموزشی دکتر یوسفزاده رو رایگان توی یوتوب ما ببینید: ✅ آموزش صفت و قید 🌀 https://youtu.be/8rg5J2Bg7Yw سرفصلها ➖ مقدمه ➖ جایگاه قید در جمله ➖ طریقه ساخت قید و صفت (شکل ظاهری) ➖ گروه جامع اسمی با شناسه، صفت و قید ➖ مثال جامع از گروه اسمی و تشخیص هسته گروه اسمی یادتون نره برای مشاهده ویدئوها، بعد از عضو شدن، روی زنگوله کلیک کنید که از ویدئوهای جدید باخبر بشید. ا…
❤16👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @GeneralEnglishPlan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 18,902 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“برنامه ریزی رایگان مطالعه زبان ارشد و دکتری” (@GeneralEnglishPlan), 31,723 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GeneralEnglishPlan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.