Channel
@bylordhenry
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
23subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002838952012 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bylordhenry |
| Description | Хорошо о плохом и наоборот |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bylordhenry |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 23 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:51 | 23 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 14 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
98 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 16 | 16.3% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 15.3% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 13.3% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 12.2% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 6.12% | |
| 🎄 | 5 | 5.10% | |
| 🎅 | 4 | 4.08% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 4.08% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 3.06% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 3.06% | |
| 😎 | 3 | 3.06% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 2.04% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 2.04% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 2.04% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 2.04% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 1.02% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.02% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 1.02% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 1.02% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.02% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 1.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 December 2025 to 4 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ну что, подписчики, нашли кого-то из бывших в прошмандовках русской эмиграции файлах Эпштейна? Проверьте, пока на этом хайпуют: https://www.justice.gov/epstein А вообще советую пробить фамилии известных политиков и почитать переписочки — там много интересного. #poli@bylordhenry
💯3
Холодно ли тебе, девица? Холодно ли тебе, красная? Фотография Патрика Личфилда для календаря Unipart, Москва, 1990 год ℜ𝔲𝔰𝔰𝔦𝔞𝔫 𝔊𝔬𝔱𝔥𝔦𝔠
🔥2
На какие вопросы вы бы ответили также, как советские?
The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤1👍1🤔1
Тем временем в трамповской резиденции Мар-а-Лаго прошел костюмированный бал с гостями в собачьих масках и «аристократических» нарядах, а специально приглашенный раввин исполнял на ритуальном шофаре. Загадочная душа американского консерватизма.
👍2👌1
Такая вот разная русская госмедицина. По-пушкински и по-достоевск..и. П.с.: ладно, у меня еще из развлечений были беседы с советскими интеллигентками. А салат в столовке больничной все-таки купленный. #life@bylordhenry
👌2👍1🥰1
Еду в поезде. Бабка объясняет, как душу отдавать в доверительное управление какой-то китайской энергии чего-то там (это, бля, цитата). Еще говорит — власти наши фальшивые. Подтверждается это тем, что даже землей-то не имеют права распоряжаться — ей вот не дали приватизировать дом на участке Минобороны, хотя она и запросы писала, и объясняла им про народные права. Что-то про курс рубля рассказывает (не тот, к которо…
😁5❤1👍1
Доказательства, что мой брат приемный ДОМОВОЙ: 1. Не иронично выпивает стакан молока хотя бы один раз в день. 2. Постоянно у меня убирает. 3. Ворует мои вещи. 4. Шумит по ночам. 5. Боится кошку. #life@bylordhenry #memes@bylordhenry
🔥4❤1
Погодите. Так арест Мадуро же. Молот полуночный. Туплю что-то.
🍾2🥰1
За пост ненависти к эйчарам мне подарили мою первую звезду, так что давайте опять поговорим про эйчаров. Про то, как их наебать. Все в курсе: им интересны мотивированные, амбициозные, но прежде всего — надежные и честные кандидаты. В приличном обществе такие запросы встречают скептичным «отсоси, потом проси», но ОТКУДА ЖЕ ЭЙЧАРАМ ЭТО ЗНАТЬ. Потому нам, господа, остается только врать и манипулировать. 😈 Итак! 1. …
🔥5🥰2😎2✍1👍1
Январские выходные это как безусловная материнская любовь. Что такое отпуск? Нет гарантий, что ты будешь отдыхать в те даты, в которые планировал. Что твой отпуск совпадет с отпуском партнера. Что у клиента не появится горящих вопросов. А январские выходные это надежно, без «но», по-настоящему. Никто не посмеет предложить тебе задачку заболевшего коллеги. Никакая тварь не позвонит. Делай, что хочешь! Даже не потом…
🎅4❤2
Сегодня волчья луна. Это означает, что случится что-то очень плохое. Возможно, в Москве. Чекайте.
👍2🤯1😱1
Зачем мне кого-то поздравлять, если всех уже поздравили США?
😁3👍1😎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @bylordhenry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
На какие вопросы вы бы ответили также, как советские?
The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 December 2025 to 4 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Акварели лорда Генри” (@bylordhenry), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bylordhenry.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.