Здесь меняем отношение к уборке и находим решения для идеальной чистоты дома.
Канал зарегистрирован в Роскомнадзоре - https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673c7abab7aeb106ce050e76®istryType=bloggersPermission
#TCRVO
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
48 measurements spanning 80 days, net +728. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,141–53,304 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Oct 2026, 20:07
53,016
-16
25 Oct 2026, 22:55
53,032
+4
23 Oct 2026, 22:31
53,028
-8
22 Oct 2026, 19:40
53,036
-13
21 Oct 2026, 17:38
53,049
-10
20 Oct 2026, 16:54
53,059
-16
19 Oct 2026, 17:40
53,075
-24
18 Oct 2026, 20:31
53,099
-14
17 Oct 2026, 18:56
53,113
-4
16 Oct 2026, 20:18
53,117
-12
15 Oct 2026, 19:37
53,129
-21
14 Oct 2026, 23:00
53,150
-20
13 Oct 2026, 18:11
53,170
+9
10 Oct 2026, 02:56
53,161
+60
5 Oct 2026, 22:42
53,101
+2
30 Sept 2026, 15:15
53,099
+298
18 Sept 2026, 02:40
52,801
-20
16 Sept 2026, 01:18
52,821
+33
14 Sept 2026, 06:38
52,788
+5
12 Sept 2026, 15:39
52,783
first reading
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 165 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.99%
avg views ÷ 53,016 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,300
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.861%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026
Posts held
38 (14 July 2026 – 26 October 2026)
Views total
63,555
Reactions total
547
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Oct 2026, 23:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,370
Videos
≈2,030
Links
≈987
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
43m 14s
Average length
1m 36s
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,296 reactions across 38 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,348
58.7%
🔥
634
27.6%
👍
207
9.02%
❤🔥
37
1.61%
🎉
31
1.35%
👏
20
0.871%
🥰
11
0.479%
😍
3
0.131%
💯
2
0.087%
🤮
2
0.087%
🙏
1
0.044%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,296 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 38 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @uborka_alena. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 26 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Записывайте рецепт чистых швов без «упороться ползая на коленках кверху 🍑»
💋Берем средство https://dombudetchistim.ru/o/ab5a5c/ или https://ozon.ru/t/Zavgb3L разбавляем его 1:3
💋наносим раствор на швы и плитку (если и её генерально хотите отмыть) даем поработать минут 7-10
💋работаем щеткой на рукояти на выбор Россия https://dombudetchistim.ru/o/b35853/ https://ozon.ru/t/ukmnjuH или Дания 🇩🇰 викан https://dombudetchis…
К слову этим же средством, НИЧЕГО НЕ КИПЯТИВ, чайники внутри чистим 👌 быстро и легко ⏰
Наливаем воды чуть-чуть выше, чем налет
Добавляем средство
Оставляем минут на 5
Смываем👌
Я еще одно кипячение делаю и сливаю перед тем как чай пить
Ссылка - https://ozon.ru/t/dwt9MzQ
УВЛАЖНИТЕЛИ и ОЧИСТИТЕЛИ ВОЗДУХА - как чистить.
Обслуживаем регулярно обязательно - вы этим дышите. А там может копиться налет, слизь, и плесень.
Порядок действий: Отключаем от сети, сливаем воду, протираем снаружи от пыли, разбираем (пример разобранных деталей на фото)
Налет белого цвета (на темных деталях) или желтого цвета (на светлых деталях) убираем спец средством от накипи - химин. https://ozon.ru/t/v09Qg4x или…
ПЯТНА КАКАО, кофе, травы, молока, яиц, вина, пота, мочи, 💩 и тд свежие, еще не стиранные очень легко уйдут, ЕСЛИ вы сначала ДО стирки обработайте их ферментами и прохладной водой. 5 минут, можно даже не тереть ничего, а просто отправить в стиралку
Сколько же головняков уйдет! Сразу проще и легче стирать станет
Внедряйте! вот проверенные ферменты: https://ozon.ru/t/9o4QWHZ или https://dombudetchistim.ru/o/c66173/ или…
вот легко вам велюр чистить!!! А вот у меня стулья гладкие …
И гладкие также чистим
Вот только что поделились девочки
ПОЛУЧАЕТСЯ!!
Всё по уроку 👉🏻 https://t.me/uborka_alena/3060
В Максе тоже урок есть https://max.ru/uborka_alena/AZ3QDOGKW0Q
ЧИСТИМ СТУЛЬЯ ДОМА САМИ даже без оборудования (у кого есть - можно и с ним)
❤️Первое правило- сухая уборка, пылесосим - идеально это делает Джимми https://ozon.ru/t/l1qlpEE- прям выбивает ткань
Если не пылесосить - усложняете работу, пыль + любая влага = грязь, размазня нам не нужна
❤️делаем раствор Ривас 1:3 с водой, наносим его, распределяем и даем поработать 3-5 мин исходя из ваших загрязнения Ссылка 🔗 https://ozo…
ОТМЫВАЕМ ПЯТНА НА ОБОЯХ точечно супер круто работаем салфеткой полировщиком (у нее микро сечение волокон, за счет чего суперски приподнимает загрязнения даже из пор фактуры) - 32! Сечения в то время как у других салфеток - максимум 16…
И спрей использую универсальный - спрей клинер👌
Сильнее воздействие, если сразу на стену наносить, но тут нужно проверять, какие у вас обои и как они реагируют по средством. Мои доста…
Внимание! Пятновыводители от немецкого бренда Киль меняют тару
Потому, что белые перерабатывать проще, для нас потребителя - цвет мелочь, а на деле - реальный вклад в сторону меньшего воздействия на окружающую среду. И это здорово!
Не пугайтесь, если получите какой то из пятновыводителей в новом формате. Все товары из нашего магазина ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ. Просто на переходный период партии приходят частично синие (как раньш…
КАКАЯ ЩЁТКА ДЛЯ ЧЕГО И КАК ИСПОЛЬЗУЕТСЯ?
смотрим видео, разбираемся в базе. Запоминаем, викан (Дания) - лучшие щетки в мире, неубиваемые, имеют допуск на работу в пищевых зонах, и решают все задачи без пароочистителей, без проблем дотянуться до сложных мест, мощно мыть в том числе в посудомоечной машине, работать со средствами и без. Идеальные!
*сегодня последний день старых цен на них. Завтра примерно на ~ 10% выра…
КАК ВЗЯТЬ МАКСИМУМ ОТ САЛФЕТОК?
многие знакомы с топовыми салфетками-полировщиками от Vileda НО! Не все знают, где и как их применять. Объясняю на пальцах: три супер силы у них.
🔥Первая. Полирует до блеска. Без разводов блестит всё сильнее, чем новое 😁 используем либо в сухом виде финишно, либо в качестве основной салфетки методом пшик и протерли круговыми движениями на зеркалах, глянце, стекле, блестящих поверхност…
КАК ОРГАНИЗОВАТЬ УБОРКУ В ДОМЕ, где есть домашние животные
Много домашних животных 🤩 давайте смотреть опыт нашей девочки-хозяйки
Что внедрено?
Первым делом. Акриловое обеспыливание. Это прям база. Ну никак без него. Даже если у вас есть роботы, пылесосы и еще несколько вариаций - тут наглядно 👉🏻 https://t.me/uborka_alena/6014
Влажная уборка. Хозяйка использует самый гигиенически чистый метод (дома еще малышка 👶) пред…
КАК ЧИСТИТЬ ПЫЛЕСОС от пыльевых клещей?
Подробно с Катей - нашей старшей бригады выездной химчистки показали, рассказали: что снимается, как вытаскивать и обратно собирать
ТРИ МИНУТЫ видео, чтобы вам было не страшно мыть и максимально понятно, как пылесос почистить за пару минут👌
Фильтры и стакан мы моем на выбор: https://ozon.ru/t/j7TfA1N или https://ozon.ru/t/WcLYXla
Форест посильнее, но и тщательнее надо сполосн…
❤27👍13🔥10
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @uborka_alena. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@uborka_alena edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
29 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@uborka_alena named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@tatianadombudetchistim named in 11 posts, 25 August 2026 – 5 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Варим-Жарим @varim_garim · 20,343 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 27 September 2026
Лилия Козорез @liliakozorez · 28,536 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“УБОРКА с Аленой. Дом будет чистый” (@uborka_alena), 53,016 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uborka_alena.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.