Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Клеверхим🍀

Channel

Клеверхим🍀

@cleverhim39

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

897subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001725815567
TypeChannel
Username@cleverhim39
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cleverhim39

Growth

892897894.57 August 2026 — 892 subscribers8 August 2026 — 892 subscribers14 August 2026 — 894 subscribers22 August 2026 — 897 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 891–898 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 23:35897+3
14 Aug 2026, 20:15894+2
8 Aug 2026, 01:04892no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:44892first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 31 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.5%
avg views ÷ 897 subscribers
Avg views / post
238
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held16 (31 May 20266 August 2026)
Views total952
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

77 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3241.6%
2228.6%
custom 5274130164865834687911.7%
🎉67.79%
😁45.19%
custom 527383342557535557133.90%
🆒11.30%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC139 viewsread 8 August 2026

По гугл картам. Как оказалось, я могу зарегистрироваться ограниченное число точек. Осталось 6, из них 2 я оставлю себе на всякий случай. Соответственно, если вам нужно добавить вашу организацию на гугл-карты, то не стоит это откладывать. Цена вопроса 10 тысяч рублей (было 8, но сейчас вот так). Добавить получится только те организации, которые есть на яндекс-картах/2гис Зачем это нужно? Гуглом по-прежнему пользуют

24 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC389 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Немного про рекламу в яндексе. Здесь реклама в крупном городе. Начал вести с января, результаты за декабрь на первом скрине: 18 конверсий по цене почти 2000 рублей. Сейчас 94 конверсии со средней ценой в 600 рублей. Стало более-менее нормально. Можно лучше, если прокачать сео. Я в принципе всем всегда говорю, что лучше всего работает связка реклама+сео. Но это не история на месяц или два - продвижением нужно занимать

4

30 Jun 2026, 09:31 UTC457 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

От самозамывов нубук может стать жёстким, прям твёрдым на ощупь, ворс западает, графопишущий эффект, соответственно исчезает. Чтобы вернуть мягкость, необходимо удалить моющие средства из кожи. И тут важно понимать, что если использовали мыло (а это не редкость), то в отличие от щелочных средств, его не надо нейтрализовывать кислотником. Твёрдые мыла - это натриевые или калиевые соли жирных кислот. При реакции с бол

👍7

26 Jun 2026, 10:54 UTC452 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нубук лучше чистить у себя. Потому что чистка может занять прилично времени. Плюс никто не мешает. Но зачастую можно почистить и на дому без особой потери качества. И в любом случае сложности будут с удалением пятен. Жировые пятна обычно можно убрать на месте с помощью сорбентов, тут главное не сорвать краску. С пятнами на водной основе может быть сложнее.

5👍3

24 Jun 2026, 07:28 UTC460 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нубук впитывает воду и пятна на водной основе. Здесь пятно крови, которое самостоятельно замывали и промочили кожу насквозь. Пытаться убрать лёгкой шлифовкой это не выйдет и растворители здесь не помогут, да и перекисью особо не поработаешь. Подобное убирается подобным, соответственно, нужно работать водными растворами. Чистить такую мебель непросто, но при наличии прямых рук и понимании процесса всё получается. 4 и

👍13🆒1

24 Jun 2026, 07:08 UTCviews —

Клеверхим🍀 pinned «4 июля в 11:00 по Москве проведу вебинар по чистке мебели из нубука. Расскажу о химии (какую можно использовать, какую нельзя), технологиях чистки на дому и в цеху, особенностях выведения пятен, жировании, немного о покраске. Место проведения эфира - яндекс…»

18 Jun 2026, 09:37 UTC569 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

4 июля в 11:00 по Москве проведу вебинар по чистке мебели из нубука. Расскажу о химии (какую можно использовать, какую нельзя), технологиях чистки на дому и в цеху, особенностях выведения пятен, жировании, немного о покраске. Место проведения эфира - яндекс телемост, запись эфира будет в закрытом канале в телеграм. По времени примерно 3 часа. По стоимости 7000 рублей, если нужна запись эфира, то 10 тысяч рублей. Во

👍3custom 52741301648658346873

16 Jun 2026, 09:16 UTC440 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Если вдруг кому нужен старый мастер отчётов в яндекс директе (мне лично в новом осень неудобно), то его можно вернуть. Вставляем эту ссылочку в адресную строку https://direct.yandex.ru/registered/main.pl?cmd=showCampStat&stat_type=campdate&show_favorites=0&group=day&with_nds=1&ulogin= И дописываем нужный логин яндекса. Всё, работаем в старом мастере отчётов, как и раньше

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @cleverhim39. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Клеверхим🍀” (@cleverhim39), 897 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cleverhim39.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.