Channel
@tytd6286
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
270subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002474782504 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tytd6286 |
| Description | 每日精选热门赛事推荐，喜欢可关注。 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 25 November 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tytd6286 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 270 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 270 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 November 2024 – 19 July 2026) |
| Views total | — |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 00:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
58 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 33 | 56.9% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 29.3% | |
| 🤮 | 5 | 8.62% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 5.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2024 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 30 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
芬联杯20:00 哈卡VS科特卡 推荐：全场大3球 欧罗巴杯23:30 贝西克VS毕尔巴鄂 推荐：客队-0.75 欧冠杯01:45 莱比锡VS里斯本竞技 推荐：全场大3球 欧冠杯04:00 费耶诺德VS拜仁 推荐：全场大3.5球 欧冠杯04:00 皇马VS萨尔茨堡 推荐：全场大4球 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
❤8🤮5👍4
卡塔尔联21:15 乌姆VS阿尔赖扬 推荐：全场大3球 阿联23:45 阿尔艾因VS迪拜青年 推荐：全场大3球 法甲02:00 南特VS摩纳哥 推荐：客队-0.75 德甲03:30 多特蒙德VS勒沃库森 推荐：全场大2.75球 意甲03:45 拉齐奥VS科莫 推荐：主队-0.75 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
❤6👍4
联赛：英格兰足总杯03:00 队伍：谢菲尔德联⚡️卡迪夫城 竞彩：【001】胜 博让平 推荐：谢菲尔德联-0.5 比分：1-0 2-0 2-1 联赛：西班牙超级杯03:00 队伍：皇家马德里⚡️马洛卡 竞彩：【002】 让平 推荐：马洛卡+1.5 比分：2-1 联赛：英格兰足总杯03:45 队伍：埃弗顿⚡️彼德堡联 竞彩：【003】让负 推荐：彼德堡联+1.5/2 比分：2-1 2-2 3-2 联赛：英格兰足总杯03:45 队伍：富勒姆⚡️沃特福德 竞彩：【004】让负 推荐：全场大2.5/3 比分：2-1 2-2 3-2 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
👍6❤3
联赛：意大利甲级联赛 22:00 队伍：那不勒斯 - 威尼斯 亚盘：那不勒斯-1.5 竞彩：半全场胜 胜 比分：3-0 4-1 3-1 联赛：英格兰超级联赛 22：30 队伍：莱切斯特 - 曼城 亚盘：曼城半场-0.5 竞彩：让平 让负 比分：0-2 1-3 0-3 联赛：英格兰超级联赛 23:00 队伍：埃弗顿 - 诺丁汉森林 亚盘：诺丁汉森林0 竞彩：平 让负 比分：1-1 0-1 0-2 联赛：英格兰超级联赛 23:00 队伍：托特纳姆热刺 - 狼队 亚盘：托特纳姆热刺角球大7 竞彩：让平 让负 比分：2-2 2-1 1-2 联赛：英格兰超级联赛 23:00 队伍：水晶宫 - 南安普顿 亚盘：水晶宫球大1.5/2 竞彩：胜 让平 比分：2-0 2-1 联赛：葡萄牙超级联赛 …
❤3🔥3
印尼超 16:30 塞曼巴东 vs 马兰 全场角球大 9.5 孟加拉联 16:30 达卡流浪者 vs 吉大港坝州 全场大 3.54 澳甲 16:35 阿德莱德联 vs 西悉尼流浪者 全场大 3.54 澳女联 17:00 珀斯光辉女足 vs 中岸水手女足 全场大 2.53 澳甲 19:45 珀斯光荣 vs 麦克阿瑟FC 上半场大 11.5 东盟锦 21:00 菲律宾 vs 泰国 泰国 -1 伊朗超 22:30 波斯波利斯 vs 霍拉马巴德 上半场大 0.51 伊朗超 22:30 塞帕汉 vs 哈瓦达 塞帕汉上半场 -0.5 海湾杯 22:30 阿联酋 vs 阿曼 阿联酋 -0.5 海湾杯 22:30 科威特 vs 卡塔尔 卡塔尔 -0.5 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
❤3
印尼超 16:30 马兰 vs PSBS巴克伦佛 全场大 2.5 澳洲甲 16:35 墨尔本胜利 vs 墨尔本城 全场小 2.53 意青联 18:00 国际米兰青年队 vs 罗马青年队 全场小 2.53 印度超 19:30 孟买城 vs 清奈因 孟买城 -1 英超 20:30 阿斯顿维拉 vs 曼城 阿斯顿维拉 +00.5 西甲 21:00 赫塔费 vs 马洛卡 马洛卡 +00.5 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
❤2
联赛：欧洲协会联赛 04:00 队伍：切尔西 ⚡️ 沙姆洛克流浪 亚盘：总进球区间 4-6 竞彩：3-4-5球 比分：3-0 4-0 4-1 联赛：欧洲协会联赛 04:00 队伍：皇家贝蒂斯 ⚡️ 赫尔辛基 亚盘：总进球区间2-3球 竞彩：1-2-3球 比分：1-0 2-0 2-1 联赛：欧洲协会联赛 04:00 队伍：佩利根 ⚡️ 新圣徒 亚盘：全场大3 竞彩：胜 比分：3-0 4-0 4-1 联赛：欧洲协会联赛 04:00 队伍：维也纳快速 ⚡️ 哥本哈根 亚盘：哥本哈根0 竞彩：让负 比分：1-1 1-2 2-2 联赛：欧洲协会联赛 04:00 队伍：拉恩 ⚡️ 根特 亚盘：总进球区间4-6球 竞彩：3-4-5球 比分：1-2 1-3 1-4 联赛：欧洲协会联赛 0…
东亚杯20:00 关岛VS中国香港 推荐：全场大3.5球 马来超21:00 彭亨VS柔佛 推荐：全场大3.75球 阿联酋超23:30 迪拜青年VS华斯尔 推荐：全场大3.5球 荷兰杯01:45 埃因霍温VS哈勒姆 推荐：客队+4 西乙02:00 格拉纳达VS卡塔赫纳 推荐：全场大2.5球 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
西甲 21:00 西班牙人 vs 奥萨苏纳 奥萨苏纳 0 意甲 22:00 卡利亚里 vs 亚特兰大 亚特兰大 -1 德甲 22:30 美因茨 vs 拜仁 拜仁 -1 德甲 22:30 柏林联合 vs 波鸿 柏林联合 -0.51 德甲 22:30 奥格斯堡 vs 勒沃库森 全场大 2.53 英超 23:00 狼队 vs 伊普斯维奇 总进球数 2-3 英超 23:00 纽卡 vs 莱切斯特 纽卡 -1.5 英超 23:00 阿森纳 vs 埃弗顿 全场大 2.53 英超 23:00 利物浦 vs 富勒姆 利物浦 -1.5 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
印尼超20:00 德瓦FCVS巴日托 推荐：全场大3球 欧会杯23:30 阿斯坦纳VS切尔西 推荐：全场大3球 欧罗巴杯01:45 霍芬海姆VS布加勒斯 推荐：全场大3球 欧会杯01:45 佩特罗古VS贝蒂斯 推荐：全场大3球 欧罗巴杯04:00 里昂VS法兰克福 推荐：全场大3球 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tytd6286. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 6,522 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“体育足球推单” (@tytd6286), 270 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tytd6286.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.