Я сижу. Слушаю этих людей. И свои мысли. Лучше бы я мысли слушал, а не их. Освальд со своими четками надоел. Джокеру не сидится на месте, теперь понятно, почему у него цепи на стуле. И самое главное, его не спрашивают. Роман строит из себя такого серьёзного. Слэйд молчит, ну и пусть. Бейн? Смотрю на него и думаю, что за амбал завёлся. Лютер недотрога, а его существо не пойми откуда взялось. Из какой банки? Я хотя бы …

Channel
𝓗𝓪𝓻𝓿𝓮𝔂 𝓓
@twofaceeot
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
53subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002728850218 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @twofaceeot |
| Description | ⚖️Heads or tails?🪙 Сетка : @echoesoftomorrow Boost : https://t.me/boost/twofaceeot |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/twofaceeot |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 53 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 53 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 74.2%
- avg views ÷ 53 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 39.4
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 46.2%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 787 |
| Reactions total | 181 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 35
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 71
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
181 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5199894541372520038 | 58 | 32.0% | |
| custom 5307896935753999024 | 46 | 25.4% | |
| custom 5273893018246600477 | 39 | 21.5% | |
| custom 5273726115817478277 | 38 | 21.0% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Я подкидывал монету, которая до моего прихода ждала меня. Пока нету мыслей. Глянул на несколько "тёмных личностей". О них ничего не могу сказать. Всех бы посадил в одну большую темницу. Но сейчас я с ними за одним столом, поэтому надо соблюдать приличие, хотя какое оно может быть? Под землёй столицы Ноктграда... Надеюсь, Гильда не волнуется за меня. Наконец, пришёл главный член этой чертовщины – Роман Сионис. Он не…
custom 51998945413725200384custom 52737261158174782774custom 53078969357539990244custom 52738930182466004773
Sticker, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
–что за scheißdreck? Харв порвал письмо, выкинув в окно, оно попало куда-то в сад, но это его не волнует. У него не было времени отвечать на какие-то странные письма, когда у него на носу встреча. Он подошёл к зеркалу, поправляя свою маску. Под его мантией был нож, уже новый. На встрече будут люди не из приятных категорий, а Харви, как он сам считал, думал, что ни в той и ни в другой категории не состоит, что он на …
custom 51998945413725200387custom 52737261158174782777custom 52738930182466004776custom 53078969357539990243
Sticker, posted without a caption
Получил письмо от Романа Сиониса. Приглашение на встречу. 𐋏ꤕ γж ተ꤀ ꤀ઞ მ꤀꤅ꤌმꤌ𐌻ꤍꤎ, પተ꤀ 𐌑ꤌр꤀ઞꤣ ઞꤕ ꤍꤌ𐌼 рꤕωꤣ𐌻 ꤙ꤀ӄ꤀ઞપꤣተ𑀨 ꤍ жꤣउઞ𑀨ળ?𐌺꤈սɠ᥉ꤍꤖꤕ꤯ßꤕ꤅. 𐌗ꤌрꤐꤣ ઞꤕ ꤍӄꤌжꤕተ Гꤣ𐌻𑀨მꤕ, ӄγმꤌ ꤀ઞ γωё𐌻, ઞꤕ 𑀋꤀પꤕተ, પተ꤀ꤒખ ꤀ઞꤌ ꤐ꤀𐌻ઞ꤀ꤐꤌ𐌻ꤌꤍ𑀨. 𐌀 ꤎ ઞꤕ жꤕ𐌻ꤌળ, પተ꤀ꤒખ ꤀ઞꤌ ꤙ꤀ꤍ𐌼ꤕ𐌻ꤌ ӄ꤀𐌼γ-ተ꤀ ꤍӄꤌउꤌተ𑀨, ӄγმꤌ ꤎ 𐌼ખ ઞꤌꤙрꤌꤐ𐌻ꤎꤕ𐌼ꤍꤎ. Կተ꤀ жꤕ ᤋተ꤀𐌼γ 𐌼ꤌ𐌻𑀨પꤣӄγ ꤐ પёрઞꤕઞ𑀨ӄ꤀꤇ 𐌼ꤌꤍӄꤕ ઞγжઞ꤀ ꤀ተ 𐌼ꤕઞꤎ? Чувствую, что я стою на двух сторонах. Одна – хорошая, белая да чистая. Другая –…
custom 51998945413725200387custom 53078969357539990246custom 52738930182466004775custom 52737261158174782771
Sticker, posted without a caption
Он наклонил голову на бок, пристально наблюдая за её зрачками. Как себя назвать? Харв не знал. Он не называл себя как-то... Лишь появлялся, делал дела, подсказывал, а потом исчезал. –Zweigesichtig,–но сразу помотал головой,–Двуликий. Дву-ли-ки-й. Прекрасное имя для меня, mein Schatz? Здоровые уголки губ приподнялись в ухмылке. А под маской ничего не видно.. Да и застыло лицо в ожоге. –Мне нравится. Харви не понрав…
custom 51998945413725200386custom 53078969357539990245custom 52737261158174782774custom 52738930182466004773
Харви отвернул голову, придерживая другой рукой маску. Он не пытался её снять, просто проверял, на месте ли она. –Нет. Я тебя буду пугать. Мое лицо ужасно. Тебе будет страшно. Я не хочу, чтобы на твоей душе были отрицательные чувства. Лучше я буду в ней ходить, чем...видеть грусть и страх в твоих глазах! Он взял в свои пальцы её ладони, прижимая к своей груди. Левая рука была в потрёпанной перчатке, которую он либо…
custom 52737261158174782777custom 51998945413725200386custom 52738930182466004775custom 53078969357539990244
–Гильда! Звучно и громко прозвучал голос, но потом Харви покашлял, будто меняя личность и тон. –Гильда... Извини, я заставил тебя волноваться. Мне надо было сбежать и заказать,–он показал на маску,–это. Я не хочу, чтобы ты видела ту сторону. Прости, Гильда, прости-... Он почувствовал на шее её теплые руки, а на плече слезу, которая пропитала ткань. Харви ожидал, что она будет кричать на него, плакать от злости, ил…
custom 51998945413725200388custom 52737261158174782776custom 53078969357539990246custom 52738930182466004772
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @twofaceeot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 590,280 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@BlackMask_EOT · 483 posts𝘿𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙠𝙚
@DeathstrokeEOT · 443 posts𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘈𝘣𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘥 // 🎭
@damn_freak_EOT · 572 postsАрхив// Ɽ?ĐĐⱠɆⱤ!!!!//🔋 | EOT🗯
@riddlerstarlinktoyEOT · 262 posts𝐁𝐀𝐍𝐄
@EOTbane · 411 postdaily planet [EOT]
@newsEOT · 491 post𝐂𝔬𝔟𝔟𝔩𝔢𝔭𝔬𝔱 𝐆𝔯𝔞𝔣𝔰𝔠𝔥𝔞𝔣𝔱
@PenguinEOT · 551 post[ЗАМОРОЖЕН]PLASTIC MAN💥🎺
@PlasticManEOT · 261 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@BlackMask_EOT · 484 posts𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘈𝘣𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘥 // 🎭
@damn_freak_EOT · 573 posts𝐂𝔬𝔟𝔟𝔩𝔢𝔭𝔬𝔱 𝐆𝔯𝔞𝔣𝔰𝔠𝔥𝔞𝔣𝔱
@PenguinEOT · 553 posts𝕎𝕠𝕨, 𝕚𝕥'𝕤 𝕊𝕦𝕡𝕖𝕣𝕓𝕠𝕪!
@ConnerKentEot · 412 posts𝘿𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙠𝙚
@DeathstrokeEOT · 442 posts𝐁𝐀𝐍𝐄
@EOTbane · 412 posts𝓖𝓲𝓵𝓭𝓪 𝓓𝓮𝓷𝓽
@GildaD_EOT · 292 posts𝑳𝒆𝒙 𝑳𝒖𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒓
@LexLuthorEOT · 482 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝓗𝓪𝓻𝓿𝓮𝔂 𝓓” (@twofaceeot), 53 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/twofaceeot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.