Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Свобода переписки

Channel

Свобода переписки

@tvestnik_svoboda

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

561subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002109773361
TypeChannel
Username@tvestnik_svoboda
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tvestnik_svoboda

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5615655636 August 2026 — 565 subscribers6 August 2026 — 565 subscribers14 August 2026 — 563 subscribers22 August 2026 — 561 subscribers7 September 2026 — 562 subscribers15 September 2026 — 561 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 40 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 560–566 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 12:20561-1
7 Sept 2026, 04:17562+1
22 Aug 2026, 14:39561-2
14 Aug 2026, 19:34563-2
6 Aug 2026, 18:16565no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:47565first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

341 reactions across 19 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤13840.5%
😭4412.9%
👍3610.6%
🔥247.04%
💔205.87%
🕊185.28%
❤‍🔥174.99%
👀92.64%
😢72.05%
🙏72.05%
🥰72.05%
👏51.47%
🤬20.587%
🤯20.587%
✍10.293%
🏆10.293%
😱10.293%
🙊10.293%
🫡10.293%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 341 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2025 to 29 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 May 2026, 16:09 UTC481 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⛔️ ⚖️ КС ответил на нашу жалобу отказом В марте этого года мы подали жалобу по делу Дмитрия Иванова в Конституционный суд РФ. Мы обратились за помощью к юристам из ЦКП с конкретной узкой специализацией в области конституционного права и несколькими победными кейсами. Мы несколько лет проходили множество инстанций, разбираясь с обстоятельствами уничтожения переписки Дмитрия Иванова и Анастасии Штельваг. Сначала нам…

👍7🕊3🤬2🤯2🔥1

23 May 2026, 11:06 UTC265 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⚖️ Результаты кассации по делу Андрея Едигарева Шестой кассационный суд общей юрисдикции рассмотрел нашу жалобу на действия СИЗО № 1 Ижевска, на решение суда первой инстанции, который не удовлетворил наши исковые требования (почему это было незаконно, мы рассказывали тут), и на отказ по апелляционной жалобе. Истец Лидия и наш юрист Сергей Буряков присутствовали на заседании из Пушкинского суда Московской области по…

❤4👍3💔2✍1😢1🙏1

17 Apr 2026, 16:33 UTC390 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Скоро будут новости о расширении нашей деятельности и итогах конституционного суда. Ждите 😎

👀5👍4🙏3

20 Mar 2026, 17:38 UTC794 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⚖️ Мы дошли до КС Решая проблему переписки с Дмитрием Ивановым, мы медленно но верно поднимаемся по ступенькам российского правосудия. И вот, уже добрались практически на самый верх. ➡️ Вплоть до Верховного суда этим делом занимался наш юрист Сергей Буряков. Однако для представительства в Конституционном суде требуется либо адвокат, либо юрист с учёной степенью. ➡️ Мы подали и зарегистрировали жалобу в Конституцио…

❤8🔥8👏2👀1

20 Jan 2026, 06:47 UTC709 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Тюремный Вестник — всё, но дело его живёт аж по ту сторону планеты. Из интервью в издании «Горгона» узнали о похожем проекте россиянки Полины Гусевой, застрявшей на полтора года в иммиграционной тюрьме на границе США и Мексики. Девушка вспомнила выпуски Вестника и сделала свою газету от руки с рисунками, анекдотами и очешуительными историями об охоте на лягушек, сборе змеиных яиц и романах тюремных охранников. Инф…

❤10👍9🥰5🙏3💔2🏆1

11 Jan 2026, 09:08 UTC605 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Декабрьский — и по совместительству последний выпуск Тюремного вестника. Подвели итоги не только месяца, но и всего 2025 года в специальной колонке от эксперта. В комментариях будет список адресатов, а под самим выпуском выложим текстовый вариант для тех, кому удобнее рассылать новости электронными сервисами, а также ответы, когда они к нам придут.

💔14❤6👏3😢3😱1🙊1

16 Dec 2025, 11:31 UTC601 views86 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @LosevPPhoto

Я закрываю Тюремный вестник. Когда я начинал этот проект, то заключённым писало не так много людей, тем более с новостями, и мои знакомые, которые сели, находились в информационной блокаде. Сейчас ситуация поменялась, написание писем стало одной из немногих возможностей заняться активизмом в эмиграции. Чем и занимаются сотни, если не тысячи людей. Поэтому проблема информационного голода стоит уже не так остро, как р…

😭44❤20🕊15😢3❤‍🔥2💔2

13 Dec 2025, 16:03 UTC≈1,770 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🎉 Ура, первая победа! 9 декабря состоялось заседание по делу о письмах Нонне Галке. Суд проходил в Новочеркасске, и интересы истца представлял местный адвокат, а не постоянный член нашей команды, так что нас ещё ожидают детали и подробности решения после публикации мотивированного решения. Тем не менее, наши исковые требования были частично удовлетворены: 🟢признано незаконным игнорирование жалобы Истца в адрес СИ…

❤15👍8🔥8❤‍🔥6

4 Dec 2025, 12:01 UTC550 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет, вот ноябрьский выпуск Тюремного вестника! Перед вами подборка ключевых событий прошлого месяца — коротко, по делу и с самыми важными акцентами. После прочтения у ваших адресатов сложится полное и непредвзятое представление о происходящем в стране и мире и текущих тенденциях. Мы собрали всё, что действительно стоит внимания. В комментариях будет список адресатов, а под самим выпуском выложим текстовый …

❤10

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tvestnik_svoboda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Свобода переписки (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…сообщили об увольнении двух тюремных цензоров{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/tvestnik_svoboda/98|title=Тюремный вестник и Свобода…”
read 13 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Свобода переписки” (@tvestnik_svoboda), 561 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tvestnik_svoboda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.