https://youtu.be/668s8zxyb_g?si=nJVETSTTsWj6CgIe
❤1
Signed Hamed

Channel
@turingthings
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
66subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002336187576 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @turingthings |
| Description | چیزای جالب و مفید کامپیوتری👾 زیر مجموعه ای از انجمن علمی دانشجویی مهندسی کامپیوتر دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز @ce_scu |
| Created | 8 February 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/turingthings |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 66 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 66 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 8 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
75 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 33 | 44.0% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 18.7% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 16.0% | |
| 👾 | 9 | 12.0% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 5.33% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 1.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2025 to 28 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://youtu.be/668s8zxyb_g?si=nJVETSTTsWj6CgIe
❤1
Signed Hamed
بازی قدیمی شکار اردک با اسلحه که معمولاً با نام "Duck Hunt" شناخته میشود، از یک حسگر نوری در اسلحه استفاده میکرد. این حسگر نوری به نور روی صفحه تلویزیون واکنش نشان میداد. وقتی بازیکن ماشه اسلحه را میکشید، صفحه تلویزیون برای یک لحظه سیاه میشد و سپس هدف (اردک) بهصورت یک مربع سفید روشن نمایش داده میشد. حسگر نوری در اسلحه این نور را تشخیص میداد و اگر هدف درست نشانهگیری شده بود، بازی آن را بهعنوان یک ضربه موفق …
❤5🔥1
Signed Foad Assareh
تکنیک charlieplexing: یکی از روش های کاهش تعداد پین مورد نیاز برای روشن کردن یک LED خاص، I/O و.... به طوری که برخلاف روش عادی استفاده از ۲ multiplexer هم اندازه، تمامی پین ها با هم در تماس اند و نقطه اشتراک دارند. از روی نیز تصویر میتوان مشاهده کرد که چینش سمت چپ ۱۶ نقطه قابل تشخیص، و شکل سمت راست ۲۸ نقطه دارند.
🔥4👎3❤2❤🔥1
Signed mohyar
میدونستید توی تگ <select> میشه از تگ <hr> برای جدا کردن آپشنها استفاده کرد؟ 👌 <select> <option>1</option> <option>2</option> <hr> <option>3</option> <option>4</option> <hr> <option>5</option> <option>6</option> </select> منبع | دمو #tricks
🔥8
Signed 丂abih
🔺اگه به آموزشهای پروژه-محور علاقه دارین، ریپازیتوری Project Based Learning برای شماست: https://github.com/practical-tutorials/project-based-learning #links
❤5👍1
Signed 丂abih
اگر در دانشگاه علوم کامپیوتر یا مهندسی کامپیوتر نخوندین و همیشه حسرت این رو داشتین تو یکی از دانشگاههای برتر تحصیل کنید، این ریپو برای شماست اگر پشتکار و تلاش لازم رو داشته باشین. این برنامه درسی بر اساس شرایط تحصیلات دانشگاهی رشته علوم کامپیوتر در مقطع لیسانس و شامل دروس دانشگاههای هاروارد، امآیتی و پرینستون و سایر دانشگاهها هستش. این برنامه درسی دارای چهار بخش اصلی است: 1-بخش Introduction: بخش مقدماتی که م…
👍7
Signed Sabih Dordab
💻 یه سیستمعامل جدا توی ویندوز داشته باش! بدون ریسک هر برنامهای رو تست کن! ▪️بعضی وقتا لازمه یه برنامه مشکوک رو تست کنی، یه سیستمعامل دیگه رو تجربه کنی، یا حتی بدون ریسک به سایتهای خاصی سر بزنی. اینجاست که ماشین مجازی (Virtual Machine) به کمکت میاد! ▪️ماشین مجازی یه نرمافزاریه که بهت اجازه میده توی ویندوز، یه سیستمعامل دیگه اجرا کنی، انگار یه کامپیوتر جداگانه داخل سیستمت داری! 🟢بهترین نرمافزارهای ماشین مجازی…
👍2
Signed Saeed Kh
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥1
Signed Saeed Kh
بچه ها به کدوم زمینه توی کامپیوتر بیشتر علاقه دارید؟🤨🤨
The shares total 182%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed Saeed Kh
📌 اولین بازی الکترونیکی از کجا اومد؟ 🎮 سال ۱۹۵۸، زمانی که هنوز خبری از کنسولهای بازی نبود، ویلیام هیگنبوتام یک بازی ساده اما انقلابی به نام Tennis for Two ساخت. این بازی روی یک اسیلوسکوپ اجرا میشد و دو بازیکن میتوانستند با کنترلهای ابتدایی، یک توپ را روی صفحه به سمت یکدیگر بفرستند. اگرچه Tennis for Two گرافیک سادهای داشت، اما یکی از نخستین قدمها در مسیر پیدایش دنیای بازیهای ویدیویی بود. 🎾 💻 توی این ویدیو می…
👾2🔥1
Signed Reza
قدیما که سیستمهای کامپیوتری فقط ترمینال داشتن، خبری از گرافیک رنگارنگ و تصویرای امروزی نبود. اما خلاقیت هیچوقت محدودیت نمیشناسه! برنامهنویسا با استفاده از کاراکترهای ASCII طرحهای خفن میساختن و دنیای خودشونو توی صفحهی سیاه و سفید ترسیم میکردن. حالا یه وبسایت جالب پیدا شده که کلی طرح ASCII براتون آماده کرده و حتی ابزارهایی داره که میتونید باهاشون طرحهای دلخواه خودتون رو بسازید. یه نمونه از یه "maze" که با ای…
🔥10👎1
Signed Mo YousefiPour
مصورسازی داده ها یکی از مهم ترین بخش های یک پروژه تحلیل دیتاست. ممکنه شما برای چند تا دیتاست مختلف ویژگی های آماری (میانگین، انحراف معیار، همبستگی و ... ) یکسانی رو محاسبه کنید ولی وقتی visualize میکنید ممکنه چند تا چیز کاملا متفاوت ببینید. به عنوان مثال میشه به Anscombe's Quartet اشاره کرد که در سال 1973 میاد و 4 تا دیتاست معرفی میکنه که ویژگی های آماری کاملا یکسانی دارند ولی زمانی که مصورسازی میکنیم، میبینیم د…
👾3
Signed Sabih Dordab
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @turingthings. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بچه ها به کدوم زمینه توی کامپیوتر بیشتر علاقه دارید؟🤨🤨
The shares total 182%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2025 to 28 March 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Turing Things” (@turingthings), 66 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/turingthings.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.