😎NFT 用户名上链教程 😎NFT 用户名使用教程1 💎NFT用户名使用教程2 😎NFT用户名出售 😎NFT用户名出售

Channel
橘子🍊NFT +888 选购 @juzi
@tujin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
782subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001915146642 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @henzhun @tujin |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tujin |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 782 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 782 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 4
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 80.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 February 2024 to 12 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://fragment.com/ 用户名上链教程
🆔 —@piantan (偏袒) 🆔 —@qipian (欺骗) 🆔 —@sanfeng (三丰) 🆔 —@jianzui (尖嘴) 🆔 —@andya (安迪) 🆔 —@yunyue (云月) 🆔 —@xiaoning (小宁) 🆔 —@bizheng(必争) 🆔 —@quxiu (去修) 🆔 —@fujin(附近.富锦, 福今.富金) 🆔 —@ruose (若瑟) 🆔 —@fanse(泛瑟,反色) 🆔 —@xiaochuo (小戳) 🆔 —@liwudan (礼物单) 🆔 —@topan (通盘) 🆔 —@kaicang (开仓) 🆔 —@kaibing (开兵) 🆔 —@xgqun (新公群 小公群) 🆔 —@weiwo (为我 卫沃) 🆔 —@zunye (尊爷 尊业 ) 🆔 —@guazong (瓜总 ) 🆔 —@fanguo (返国 藩国) 🆔 —@zunge…
❤1
🆔 —@x0363 🆔 —@x0533 🆔 —@izi520 🆔 —@t036t 🆔 —@w263w 🆔 —@v7127 🆔 —@i7072 🆔 —@g6067 🆔 —@cuichuai 🆔 —@nnss1 🆔 —@bykf9 🆔 —@dangteng 🆔 —@z9979 🆔 —@h0050 🆔 —@js5555555 🆔 —@s957s 🆔 —@lno888 🆔 —@z5555u 🆔 —@xx33i 🆔 —@pnu888 🆔 —@pqe888 🆔 —@nxi888 🆔 —@pku888 🆔 —@zosos 🆔 —@vv2kk
🆔 —@VVV22 🆔 —@OOO33 🆔 —@KKK22
🆔 —@t036t 🆔 —@cuichuai 🆔 —@andya 🆔 —@niuru 🆔 —@xiaoning
🆔@huayan 【花颜】 🆔@xiaoning 【小宁】 🆔@yunyue 【云月】 🆔@pengshi 彭氏 🆔@ruoqi 若琪 🆔@entou {摁头) 🆔@naiyi (奈一) 🆔@henzhun (很准) 🆔@chuanxuan 穿选) 🆔@kuangbai(狂白) 🆔@suguo(苏果 🆔@fazui(伐罪) 🆔@duorun(多润) 🆔@duolu(多路) 🆔@baxian(八仙) 🆔@qipian(欺骗 🆔@taiquan(泰拳) 🆔@xiuhei(休嘿) 🆔@fupoquan(富婆圈) 🆔@bangwan (傍晚) 🆔@kuochuo (阔绰) 🆔@oooTT 🆔@oowww 🆔@sssqq 🆔@m6611 🆔@HHHCC 🆔@GGLLL 🆔@g8811 🆔@e1166 🆔@kuuuuu 🆔@NHHHHH 🆔@pbbbbb 🆔@eeezz 🆔@hvvvvv 🆔@UVVVVVVV 🆔@LLLHH 🆔@p…
❤2
@huayan 花颜
橘子🍊NFT +888 选购 @juzi pinned a photo
🥰官方网站 https://fragment.com/ 分享完成之后在飞机-设置-用户名显示
https://fragment.com/ 用户名使用教程 分享完成之后在飞机-设置-用户名显示
❤1
@hqjq1 @hqjq2 已售 @hqjq3 已售 @hqjq4 @hqjq5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tujin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 657,603 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@liwudan · 1,4773 posts橘子好物分享 NFT专业户
@baxian · 2,4632 posts🦋总导航(知识库) @vvoo
@xs333 · 1072 posts傍晚
@bangwan · 5,2711 post马来小助手新闻 @eee44
@DYZJLP · 9,3951 post聪聪的村头指挥所☘️
@fanfa · 2,9401 post比心大食堂
@fanguo · 37,2701 post🌌阿宝·NFT +888 ❇️
@fazui · 1371 post🕊 永不失联💠 @eeezz
@gezi08 · 2231 post🆃🅶资源·源头商品🌌
@hhhcc · 6,2141 post🕊NFT 888 用户名🌸 @gezi
@jekomba · 2111 postVicTorious公益内核【副频道】
@libai7072 · 6,6471 post👑𝑻𝑮性价比之王 @Mina
@minaziyuan · 5861 post翔哥-用户名出售
@ooott · 471 post🌌阿宝·最全礼物频道🎁
@oowww · 1251 post尊爷
@weiwo · 61 post大本营(椰子解答) @gglll
@yeziheji · 2131 post礼物交易所 @sssqq
@yeziliwu · 5081 post🌈 永不迷路(心脏) @zang
@zangzango · 1461 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 31
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 31
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@tujin named 31 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 3 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“橘子🍊NFT +888 选购 @juzi” (@tujin), 782 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tujin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.