Video, posted without a caption
Signed 七七(漫无目的)

Channel
@qiLaopo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
183subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002345537266 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qiLaopo |
| Description | 记录小七的生活碎片 @qqLaopo |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 11 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qiLaopo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 183 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 183 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
23 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6323099429251319464 | 15 | 65.2% | |
| custom 6323168857397659660 | 5 | 21.7% | |
| custom 6323233797303175306 | 2 | 8.70% | |
| custom 6323396576563693316 | 1 | 4.35% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 October 2024 to 26 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
Signed 七七(漫无目的)
https://t.me/guchi520 替古驰发的
Signed 大牛
国内开户外资银行 🥰华美银行 大新银行 渣打银行 🥰星展银行 韩亚银行 花旗银行 🥰玉山银行 汇丰银行 东亚银行 🥰恒生银行 新韩银行 友利银行 🥰lbk银行 恒生银行 不看额度 只要不是非柜面就要✅ 有的来问价 可拉担保🤜 📥联系:@henzhun 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
Signed 谷驰
无人扶我青云志 我自踏雪至山巅 倘若命中无此运 孤身亦可登昆仑
Signed 谷驰
想看我直播吗今晚
Signed 谷驰
下播了 明天见
Signed 谷驰
😀 PCTOP TG赌场 @PCYL 💰 上万种游戏等您来体验! 体育 电子 棋牌 视讯 棋牌 区块链游戏 转盘 - 基于 Telegram 的线上赌场🎰 💰分享赚钱 - 分享给您的朋友, 轻松赚取超高反水。
Signed 谷驰
@PCTOPC8 充值到账 开干
Signed 谷驰
https://t.me/PCTOPC8 关注一下晚点发红包
Signed 谷驰
Video, posted without a caption
Signed 谷驰
当年我们几兄弟说过一直在一起做一辈子兄弟 可是现在进去的进去 坐牢的坐牢 出国的出国 枪毙的枪毙 已经物是人非了😭😭😭
Signed 谷驰
兄弟们,我已经辞职了,以后全职跟你们聊天了,上个逼班把我跟大家关系都搞淡了。现实亲戚朋友全断了,真交友还得是咱们网上这群兄弟。
custom 63231688573976596605
Signed 谷驰
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @qiLaopo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@qiLaopo named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“七七最棒啦” (@qiLaopo), 183 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qiLaopo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.