Channel
@tt_sbor
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
892subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001906917630 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tt_sbor |
| Description | 🌴🏓Сборы по настольному теннису в г. Сочи для любителей с рейтингом от 200 https://youtube.com/@tt-sbor 📝Записаться +79181117668, ast@as-tec.ru Специальный Андрей 📌мы в ВК https://vk.com/tt_sbor |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tt_sbor |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 892 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 892 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 14 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
103 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 42 | 40.8% | |
| ❤ | 38 | 36.9% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 19.4% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 2.91% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2025 to 16 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VSb5xKDpmF | 1 | 16 January 2026 | 16 January 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2025 to 16 January 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🎬 Уже в кинотеатрах 😊 В поддержку фильма "Марти Великолепный" наш клуб совместно с кинотеатром "Каро" договорись провести мастер-класс в фойе Галерее возле кинозалов в суботу в 17:00. Приглашаем гостей нашего клуба посмотреть кино и присоединиться к мероприятию. Расписание сеансов https://karofilm.ru/film/15415?erid=2VSb5xKDpmF&date=2026-01-17 А помните, одно время были популярны флешмобы? Когда люди договариваютс…
❤6👍6
🎄 Благотворительный турнир в Рождественский сочельник В нем каждый будет победителем, ведь все средства мы направим в приют "Зелёный луч" в станице Голубицкой. Кто не сможет принять участие, но хочет помочь детям - можете сделать перечисление самостоятельно или через нашу команду. https://priutdetyam.ru Клуб "Матч-пойнт", г. Краснодар @matchpoint_krd
❤6
✊✊✊ Пытаемся добиться первого большого российского кино про настольный теннис! Месяца полтора назад я познакомился с профессиональным режиссером Ильей Девятияровым. Его партнер и сценарист Анна Шанина увлекается настольным теннисом и подтолкнула Илью попытаться снять кино про наш вид спорта. Сперва Илья попал в отобранную десятку проекта «Ленфильм-Дебют», где пошла стадия необходимости снятия тизер-трейлера для за…
👍13
Автор лучшего блога о настольном теннисе:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🏓 Пора выбирать лучшего блогера по настольному теннису 2025! 👆Чей контент в этом году был для вас самым полезным и интересным? Предлагаем ориентироваться на ключевые критерии: 🔴Аудитория и охват 🔴Регулярность публикаций 🔴Разнообразие форматов контента Голосуйте за того, кто, по вашему мнению, достоин этого титула 👇 1️⃣ Иван Толмачев 2️⃣ Антон Хмарук 3️⃣ Алексей Силантьев 4️⃣ Артем Тихонов 5️⃣ Илья Ронин 6️⃣ …
❤1
🎉 Поздравляем тренеров с праздником ⚡️Друзья, сегодня мы поздравляем тех людей, без которых не случились бы 5 прошедших сборов, наших тренеров. Тренер это человек, который видит потенциал каждого спортсмена, видит его сильные и слабые стороны, верит в него даже когда сам спортсмен не верит. 👍За три года своим опытом и знаниями с участниками поделились уже 9 тренеров. Каждый из них достоин того, чтобы его имя было н…
❤9🔥9👍6
☄️ Трехдневный тренировочный интенсив на ноябрьские праздники Друзья, мы собираем желающих на тренировочный интенсив со 2 по 4 ноября . Тренерский состав: ⭐️Дмитрий Щепетнёв, мастер спорта (рейтинг ФНТР 1249, РТТФ 956) ⭐️ Матризаева Александра, мастер спорта (рейтинг ФНТР 1164, РТТФ 696) ❓Как проходит интенсив? Три дня по две тренировки в день с двумя тренерами! Первая тренировка 3 часа с 10:00 до 13:00 Вторая тре…
❤4
🏓 В субботу завершили пятые сборы для любителей в Сочи 💪 Полноценная тренировка, много БКМ, много заданий на перемещение. 👏 Благодарю тренеров и участников за самоотдачу. Большой пост о наших пятых сборах напишу чуть позже.
👍13🤔1
✔️Завершился третий тренировочный день сборов 🏓 Прямиком со сборов в Казахстане к нам присоединился Данил Черкес. Каждый тренер имеет свой подход и доносит свои мысли по-своему. Участникам сборов выдалась хорошая возможность поработать с тремя классными тренерами.
❤4🤔1
🤝 Благодарность тренеру Первый цикл тренировок закончился и участники ушли на день отдыха. Два дня с нами отработал мастер спорта Щепетнев Дмитрий @shchepetnevd Дима очень техничный игрок и грамотный тренер. Быстро включился в работу и нашел подход к каждому участнику. Умеет объяснить и показать правильную технику и донести до спортсмена, почему нужно делать именно так. У Димы большой перечень призовых мест в разл…
❤5🔥2🤔1
🏓 Второй день сборов в самом разгаре Вчера начали пятые по счету сборы в Сочи. Видео с открытия нет🤷♂ Тренеры Дмитрий Шепетнёв и Александра Матризаева на первой тренировке смотрели уровень участников, уточняли запросы, кто с каким приехал. Сегодня уже размялись на свежем воздухе и перешли в зал.
🔥9👍4❤3
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @tt_sbor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Автор лучшего блога о настольном теннисе:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2025 to 16 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@tt_sbor named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сборы по настольному теннису для любителей” (@tt_sbor), 892 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tt_sbor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.